{"id":1059727,"date":"2026-06-30T13:53:16","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T13:53:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1059727\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T13:53:16","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T13:53:16","slug":"eu-new-cmpf-report-shows-deterioration-of-journalists-working-conditions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1059727\/","title":{"rendered":"EU: New CMPF report shows deterioration of journalists’ working conditions"},"content":{"rendered":"

The\u00a0Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom\u00a0(CMPF) has just published the\u00a0Media Pluralism Monitor 2026\u00a0(#MPM2026), the most comprehensive EU-wide assessment of risks to media pluralism and press freedom. The report shows that the working conditions of journalists, in terms of salaries and social security schemes, are deteriorating. The situation is particularly worrying in one in three countries in Europe.<\/strong><\/p>\n

This year\u2019s findings show how weak business models, big tech, lack of protection against legal intimidation practices, and market concentration are challenging the resilience of media pluralism in Europe, despite the entry into force of the\u00a0European Media Freedom Act<\/a>\u00a0(EMFA).<\/p>\n

In particular,\u00a0the MPM report<\/a>\u00a0analyses the current state of favourable conditions for free and independent journalism (in terms of both working conditions and safety of journalists from physical, verbal and legal harassment). With regard to this key protection indicator, only six countries (out of the 31 analysed) offer a decent level of protection: Luxembourg (8% risk level), Denmark (14%), Estonia (15%), Sweden (20%), Finland (27%) and Ireland (30%). On this criterion, the countries with the poorest performance are Serbia (77%) and Greece (69%).<\/p>\n

The indicator relating to journalists\u2019 working conditions is even more worrying. One-third of EU Member States and candidate countries face high risks under this sub-indicator. Hungary, Greece, Croatia and Romania are the worst-performing EU Member State for journalists\u2019 working conditions (97% risk level!), followed by France, Italy, Spain, Serbia, Albania, Bulgaria and Slovenia (75% risk level). At the other end of the ranking, Denmark is the only country that generally offers good working conditions for media workers (3% risk level).<\/p>\n

The report notes that \u201cthe number of employed journalists continues to decline \u2013 albeit at a slower pace than before \u2013 working conditions of freelancers remain poor, and the business models of news media are increasingly vulnerable to the digital transformation. News media, especially online, attempt innovations in business models, formats and processes, but this so far does not translate into any significant increase in revenue\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe working conditions of journalists, especially local journalists and freelancers, remain poor throughout Europe and in some countries there is a freeze on or lack of collective labour agreements (e.g. in Italy and Greece). Large media houses and PSMs are also cutting jobs. (\u2026) The use of AI in journalism poses further threats for newsroom staffing. In Belgium, for example, the magazine Elle published articles under the name of fictional journalists: more than half of the online content was proved to be AI- generated. Due to these labour issues, a decreasing number of young people are joining the profession. Economic instability jeopardises the quality of reporting, further increasing journalists\u2019 vulnerability to external pressures and negatively impacting journalists\u2019 mental health\u201d.<\/p>\n

In its Recommendations section, the report calls on the European Union to introduce \u201cstronger binding measures to protect journalists\u2019 working conditions, including the effective enforcement of the Minimum Wage Directive\u201d. Member States are, for their part, called upon to \u201cintroduce labour legislation that guarantees journalists adequate minimum wages and access to social security protections\u201d. The report also calls on the media industry to \u201cinclude the journalists\u2019 representatives in the negotiations with the platforms and AI companies in order to distribute the revenue along the media value chain, and evaluate the impact of newsroom innovations on employment and working conditions\u201d.<\/p>\n

The MPM study confirms the findings of\u00a0the recent report<\/a>\u00a0by the\u00a0European Economic and Social Committee\u00a0(EESC) on the deterioration of working conditions for journalists in Europe.\u00a0Although initiated by the trade union component of the EESC, the own-initiative opinion, entitled\u00a0\u2018Labour rights for journalists and media professionals as a safeguard for independence and truthful information\u2019<\/a>, received very broad support from representatives of the other two components, employers and civil society, during the Committee\u2019s plenary vote, on 3 December 2025.<\/p>\n

Check the interactive MPM map,\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The\u00a0Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom\u00a0(CMPF) has just published the\u00a0Media Pluralism Monitor 2026\u00a0(#MPM2026), the most comprehensive EU-wide…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1059728,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5174],"tags":[290957,290955,2000,299,5187,1699,14280,290958,290956,72715],"class_list":["post-1059727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-eu","tag-mpm2026","tag-centre-for-media-pluralism-and-media-freedom-cmpf","tag-eu","tag-europe","tag-european","tag-european-union","tag-journalists","tag-media-pluralism","tag-media-pluralism-monitor-2026","tag-press-freedom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/116839396728539351","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1059727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1059727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1059727\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1059728"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1059727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1059727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1059727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}