{"id":1122880,"date":"2026-07-31T21:36:29","date_gmt":"2026-07-31T21:36:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1122880\/"},"modified":"2026-07-31T21:36:29","modified_gmt":"2026-07-31T21:36:29","slug":"extensible-universal-photonic-quantum-computing-with-nonlinearity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1122880\/","title":{"rendered":"Extensible universal photonic quantum computing with nonlinearity"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Rad, H. A. et al. Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer. Nature 638<\/b>, 912\u2013919 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Larsen, M. V. et al. Integrated photonic source of Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill qubits. Nature 642<\/b>, 587\u2013591 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    PsiQuantum Team A manufacturable platform for photonic quantum computing. Nature 641<\/b>, 876\u2013883 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Konno, S. et al. Logical states for fault-tolerant quantum computation with propagating light. Science 383<\/b>, 289\u2013292 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bente, I. et al. The potential of multidimensional photonic computing. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7<\/b>, 439\u2013450 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    O\u2019Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vu\u010dkovi\u0107, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photonics 3<\/b>, 687\u2013695 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bartolucci, S. et al. Fusion-based quantum computation. Nat. Commun. 14<\/b>, 912 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maring, N. et al. A versatile single-photon-based quantum computing platform. Nat. Photonics 18<\/b>, 603\u2013609 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kawasaki, A. et al. Real-time observation of picosecond-timescale optical quantum entanglement towards ultrafast quantum information processing. Nat. Photonics 19<\/b>, 271\u2013276 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lib, O. et al. Resource-efficient photonic quantum computation with high-dimensional cluster states. Nat. Photonics 18<\/b>, 1218\u20131224 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yu, S. et al. A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3<\/b>, 839\u2013848 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Noh, K. & Chamberland, C. Fault-tolerant bosonic quantum error correction with the surface-Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill code. Phys. Rev. A 101<\/b>, 012316 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606<\/b>, 75\u201381 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Biagi, N., Francesconi, S., Zavatta, A. & Bellini, M. Photon-by-photon quantum light state engineering. Prog. Quantum Electron. 84<\/b>, 100414 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Costanzo, L. S. et al. Measurement-induced strong Kerr nonlinearity for weak quantum states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119<\/b>, 013601 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lloyd, S. & Braunstein, S. L. Quantum computation over continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82<\/b>, 1784 (1999).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bartlett, S. D. & Sanders, B. C. Universal continuous-variable quantum computation: requirement of optical nonlinearity for photon counting. Phys. Rev. A 65<\/b>, 042304 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77<\/b>, 513 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shapiro, J. H. Single-photon Kerr nonlinearities do not help quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 73<\/b>, 062305 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Miwa, Y. et al. Exploring a new regime for processing optical qubits: squeezing and unsqueezing single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113<\/b>, 013601 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jeong, H., Lund, A. P. & Ralph, T. C. Production of superpositions of coherent states in traveling optical fields with inefficient photon detection. Phys. Rev. A 72<\/b>, 013801 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gottesman, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Encoding a qubit in an oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 64<\/b>, 012310 (2001).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vasconcelos, H. M., Sanz, L. & Glancy, S. All-optical generation of states for \u2018Encoding a qubit in an oscillator\u2019. Opt. Lett. 35<\/b>, 3261\u20133263 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80<\/b>, 885 (2008).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yonezu, K., Enomoto, Y., Yoshida, T. & Takeda, S. Time-domain universal linear-optical operations for universal quantum information processing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131<\/b>, 040601 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Enomoto, Y., Yonezu, K., Mitsuhashi, Y., Takase, K. & Takeda, S. Programmable and sequential Gaussian gates in a loop-based single-mode photonic quantum processor. Sci. Adv. 7<\/b>, eabj6624 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yu, S. et al. Topological network analysis using a programmable photonic quantum processor. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2507.08157<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Asavanant, W. et al. Generation of time-domain-multiplexed two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366<\/b>, 373\u2013376 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Larsen, M. V., Guo, X., Breum, C. R., Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. & Andersen, U. L. Deterministic generation of a two-dimensional cluster state. Science 366<\/b>, 369\u2013372 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chang, D. E., Vuleti\u0107, V. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum nonlinear optics\u2014photon by photon. Nat. Photonics 8<\/b>, 685\u2013694 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Patel, R. B., Ho, J., Ferreyrol, F., Ralph, T. C. & Pryde, G. J. A quantum Fredkin gate. Sci. Adv. 2<\/b>, e1501531 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    O\u2019Brien, J. L., Pryde, G. J., White, A. G., Ralph, T. C. & Branning, D. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate. Nature 426<\/b>, 264\u2013267 (2003).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Simon, H., Caron, L., Journet, R., Cotte, V. & Tualle-Brouri, R. Experimental demonstration of a versatile and scalable scheme for iterative generation of non-Gaussian states of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133<\/b>, 173603 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sychev, D. V. et al. Enlargement of optical Schr\u00f6dinger\u2019s cat states. Nat. Photonics 11<\/b>, 379\u2013382 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lvovsky, A. I. & Raymer, M. G. Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81<\/b>, 299\u2013332 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weigand, D. J. & Terhal, B. M. Generating grid states from Schr\u00f6dinger-cat states without postselection. Phys. Rev. A 97<\/b>, 022341 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Crescimanna, V., Yu, S., Heshami, K. & Patel, R. B. Adaptive non-Gaussian quantum state engineering. Phys. Rev. A 112<\/b>, 053705 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zurek, W. H. Sub-Planck structure in phase space and its relevance for quantum decoherence. Nature 412<\/b>, 712\u2013717 (2001).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Baragiola, B. Q., Pantaleoni, G., Alexander, R. N., Karanjai, A. & Menicucci, N. C. All-Gaussian universality and fault tolerance with the Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123<\/b>, 200502 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kalajdzievski, T., Weedbrook, C. & Rebentrost, P. Continuous-variable gate decomposition for the Bose\u2013Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A 97<\/b>, 062311 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574<\/b>, 505\u2013510 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Daley, A. J. et al. Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Nature 607<\/b>, 667\u2013676 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Aspuru-Guzik, A. & Walther, P. Photonic quantum simulators. Nat. Phys. 8<\/b>, 285\u2013291 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273<\/b>, 1073\u20131078 (1996).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fadrn\u00fd, J. et al. Experimental preparation of multiphoton-added coherent states of light. npj Quantum Inf. 10<\/b>, 89 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Luo, H., Shah, P. S., Yang, F., Mirhosseini, M. & Mahmoodian, S. Dynamic stimulated emission for deterministic addition and subtraction of propagating photons. Preprint at https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2512.09711<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Uppu, R., Midolo, L., Zhou, Y., Carolan, J. & Lodahl, P. Femtosecond few-fermion dynamics and deterministic single-photon gain in a quantum dot. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16<\/b>, 1308\u20131317 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sotier, F. et al. Femtosecond few-fermion dynamics and deterministic single-photon gain in a quantum dot. Nat. Phys. 5<\/b>, 352\u2013356 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Steindl, P. et al. Artificial coherent states of light by multiphoton interference in a single-photon stream. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126<\/b>, 143601 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lund, M. M., Yang, F., Christiansen, V. R., Kornovan, D. & M\u00f8lmer, K. Subtraction and addition of propagating photons by two-level emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133<\/b>, 103601 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hastrup, J. & Andersen, U. L. Protocol for generating optical Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill states with cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128<\/b>, 170503 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tiarks, D., Schmidt-Eberle, S., Stolz, T., Rempe, G. & D\u00fcrr, S. A photon\u2013photon quantum gate based on Rydberg interactions. Nat. Phys. 15<\/b>, 124\u2013126 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Staunstrup, M. J. R. et al. Direct observation of a few-photon phase shift induced by a single quantum emitter in a waveguide. Nat. Commun. 15<\/b>, 7583 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Winnel, M. S., Guanzon, J. J., Singh, D. & Ralph, T. C. Deterministic preparation of optical squeezed cat and Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133<\/b>, 230602 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Harris, T. B., Matsuura, T., Baragiola, B. Q. & Menicucci, N. C. Logical channel for heralded and pure loss with the Gottesman\u2013Kitaev\u2013Preskill code. Phys. Rev. A 112<\/b>, 042417 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Finco, G. et al. Time-bin entangled Bell state generation and tomography on thin-film lithium niobate. npj Quantum Inf. 10<\/b>, 135 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yu, S. et al. Shedding light on the future: exploring quantum neural networks through optics. Adv. Quantum Technol. 8<\/b>, 2400074 (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, B. et al. Observation of gauge invariance in a 71-site Bose\u2013Hubbard quantum simulator. Nature 587<\/b>, 392\u2013396 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Rad, H. A. et al. Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer. Nature 638, 912\u2013919 (2025). Article\u00a0…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1122881,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[3845],"tags":[14906,3968,27592,74,7030,15191,11112,70,16,15],"class_list":["post-1122880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-physics","tag-applied-and-technical-physics","tag-general","tag-photonic-devices","tag-physics","tag-quantum-information","tag-quantum-optics","tag-quantum-physics","tag-science","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1122880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1122880\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1122881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1122880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1122880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1122880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}