Given how its tentacles reach into every aspect of UK life post our formal departure in 2020, it is difficult to quantify how many times Brexit has been formally debated in the House of Commons ever since. Given that it touches virtually every aspect of public policy, it would be unfair to say that it hasn\u2019t been picked apart extensively virtually every week over the past six years.<\/p>\n
But a debate on the actual wisdom of the overall decision? That hasn\u2019t been forthcoming. The perceived wisdom that it was done, move on, nothing to see here, seems to have precluded any form of sensible, reasonable debate on the rightness or not of the decision.<\/p>\n
This week, a debate was held in Parliament \u2013 albeit in Westminster Hall, in effect a break-out room for interested parties to hold debates of usually niche and often esoteric interest. Not the ideal place for one on the impact of the 2016 Brexit referendum, 10 years after the event. But it was the one we got.<\/p>\n
Called by SNP MP, ardent Remainer (as one would expect) and former Runrig synth wizard Pete Wishart, you might have thought Reform would have been there mobhanded, keen to sing the virtues of Brexit, cheer its successes and toast its MPs\u2019 roles in securing the verdict which was, for many of them, their lives\u2019 work. But no, they were not. No Nigel Farage, no Richard Tice. Even Lee Anderson appeared to have found something better to do \u2013 perhaps a dot-to-dot puzzle.<\/p>\n
In fact, the only Reform MP who bothered attending was Andrew Rosindell. Can you picture him? Try. No \u2013 that\u2019s Mark Francois you\u2019re thinking of. Rosindell was the Conservative MP for Romford who defected in January to very little fanfare, and was previously best-known for campaigning post-Brexit for BBC One to broadcast the national anthem after shutdown every night. BBC One has not shut down at night since 1997.<\/p>\n
It was the job of Rosindell, not a man you\u2019d necessarily want to find next to you on an\u00a0Only Connect\u00a0team, whose job it was to bat for Brexit in a room that, sparsely-attended as it was, was dominated by Remainers.<\/p>\n
Otherwise, a couple of Tory true-believers aside, it was an opportunity for speaker after speaker to tear into the disaster that is Brexit in every aspect \u2013 led by Wishart, a talented speaker with an eye for the Hansard stenographer.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought that there would be an overwhelming clamour to secure a debate to celebrate the 10 years since the Brexit referendum,\u201d he said with mock incredulity.<\/p>\n
\u201cI thought people would be tripping over themselves to ensure that they could tell us about all the wonderful things that have happened.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt would have been an opportunity to go wandering through the sunlit uplands to celebrate the dynamic economic growth and political stability that had been secured, the fact that immigration was under control, and all the wonders of our new-found freedoms.\u201d<\/p>\n
Throughout this, Rosindell sat behind him, arms sullenly crossed and with the face of a man who\u2019d just been told his budgie had been shot.<\/p>\n
The Reform MP had his go \u2013 interjecting, gurning, looking variously furious, injured and perplexed, but whenever a speaker gave way and let him speak, he gave the game away. He never spoke about Brexit\u2019s current benefits or its future potential, but instead, he ruminated on the past. John Major had not been spoken about so much in Parliament for nearly three decades.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe were not part of a simple trading arrangement: under the Maastricht treaty, which the Conservative government of John Major signed us up to without a referendum, our sovereignty was handed away to a political union,\u201d he complained.<\/p>\n
\u201cThose in the civil service, those in government under Theresa May and the establishment in this country did everything they possibly could to derail Brexit,\u201d he moaned at another point. \u201cUnder Theresa May\u2019s agreement, we would have been half in and half out of the European Union.\u201d<\/p>\n
A later speaker, the Conservative MP for Kingswinford and South Staffordshire Mike Wood, was actually on Rosindell\u2019s side, attacking Andy Burnham\u2019s government for pursuing \u201cunilateral dynamic alignment, shackling the 92% of British firms that do not trade with the EU to Brussels\u2019s rulebook\u201d. But that didn\u2019t chime with Rosindell, who didn\u2019t want to talk about the future. He wanted to talk about the past!<\/p>\n
\u201cDoes he also repudiate John Major\u2019s government for bringing in the Maastricht treaty, which created political union in the first place?\u201d asked Rosindell, hopefully. Wood looked baffled. \u201cIt is one thing to look back over the past 10 years, but I hope the honourable gentleman will excuse me if I plead that I was taking GCSEs in 1992 rather than paying attention to what John Major was doing,\u201d he said, not entirely unreasonably.<\/p>\n
It was a pathetic sight from a politician who peaked around the early 1990s and is resolutely determined to stay there. But at least he turned up, which was more than can be said of any of his party colleagues.<\/p>\n
\u201cI secured this debate because I could not believe that in June this year, no one made any attempt to even recognise the fact that we had left the European Union 10 years ago,\u201d said Wishart in his introduction. \u201cThere was no carrying of the honourable member for Clacton down the Mall in ticker-tape processions.\u201d<\/p>\n
No, there wasn\u2019t. No wonder he stayed away.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Given how its tentacles reach into every aspect of UK life post our formal departure in 2020, it…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1184667,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5226],"tags":[802,748,2000,299,5187,1699,4884,7779,386,16,15],"class_list":["post-1184666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-brexit","tag-brexit","tag-britain","tag-eu","tag-europe","tag-european","tag-european-union","tag-great-britain","tag-house-of-commons","tag-reform-uk","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/117208791511870406","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1184666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1184666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1184666\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1184667"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1184666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1184666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1184666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}