{"id":1188120,"date":"2026-09-05T15:52:50","date_gmt":"2026-09-05T15:52:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1188120\/"},"modified":"2026-09-05T15:52:50","modified_gmt":"2026-09-05T15:52:50","slug":"the-brexit-scorecard-10-years-on-news-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/1188120\/","title":{"rendered":"The Brexit scorecard: 10 years on | News Politics"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tCod help us all (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Brexit. Remember that? Fun, wasn\u2019t it? The entire nation bickering, arguing and having a go at each other about things like flags.<\/p>\n

Good to see we\u2019ve all evolved and grown up since then, eh?<\/p>\n

It feels like only yesterday that every other conversation in Britain somehow ended with someone storming off muttering something about Article 50. Then again, it somehow also feels about 200 years ago. There\u2019s been plenty in the news to keep us occupied since the 2016 vote, after all.<\/p>\n

Anyway, a decade on from the controversial referendum, a new poll suggests that some 55% of Britons would now vote to rejoin the EU. And only 32% of the 10,000 people quizzed said they\u2019d stay out.<\/p>\n

Whether that\u2019s because we\u2019ve changed our minds or because we\u2019re British and therefore constitutionally incapable of not complaining about something is open to debate.<\/p>\n

So was it a bad idea? Rather than arguing all over again about whether Brexit was a triumph or a catastrophe, we thought we\u2019d mark its homework and decide once and for all if it was a good idea or not.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\tMake sense of the mad world of British politics\t\t\t<\/p>\n

Get analysis of the latest stories direct to your inbox from Metro\u2019s Senior Politics Reporter Craig Munro.\u00a0Sign up here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ve picked 10 of the biggest issues Brexit was supposed to tackle and marked its performance in each one out of 10\u2026<\/p>\n

Food prices<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tSome economists are predicting that we\u2019re only a year away from the first \u00a3100 lunch meal deal (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s kick off with one of the easiest promises to mark. Cheaper food never materialised. While Brexit wasn\u2019t the only reason your weekly shop has got so expensive you\u2019ve started eating the packaging to try and get value for money, economists generally agree that new trade barriers have added a number of costs for importers and retailers. <\/p>\n

Covid, war and inflation all played their part, of course, but this is one promise that can\u2019t really claim a pass.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 2\/10<\/p>\n

The economy<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tLook at that graph, it\u2019s going down \u2013 so you know this category isn\u2019t scoring well (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Britain just about swerved the immediate post-referendum recession that plenty of folk predicted in 2016. But most major forecasters believe the economy is smaller than it would otherwise have been. <\/p>\n

Separating Brexit from Covid, the energy crisis and global inflation is impossible, which is why this ends up somewhere in the middle rather than at either extreme.<\/p>\n

That said, Bloomberg Economics estimates that Brexit costs the country anywhere up to \u00a3200bn a year. To put that into some sort of financial context, that\u2019s enough to buy nearly 200 billion \u00a31 scratchcards each and every year.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 4 \/10<\/p>\n

Trade<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tThat LED toilet night light you ordered from Temu in 2024 is in one of those containers somewhere (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

The promise we were made was that Britain would thrive as an independent trading nation if it gave the EU the old Spanish archer. <\/p>\n

Trade didn\u2019t exactly grind to a halt, but exporting to the EU became quite a lot more bureaucratic for many businesses, particularly smaller ones. New costs and fees haven\u2019t helped, either. So there are a lot more forms involved now. And invoices.<\/p>\n

New trade deals have been signed around the world, but they haven\u2019t fully offset the extra friction with Britain\u2019s biggest trading partner.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 4\/10<\/p>\n

\u2018Our NHS\u2019<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tCheer up! You lot are \u00a350m a day richer now, aren\u2019t you\u2026? (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

The now (in)famous \u00a3350 million-a-week claim made on the side of a bus very quickly became one of the defining images of the referendum. Vote Leave and the NHS would receive a giant windfall. Nice and straightforward. A cheque for \u00a3350,000,000 paid into its account every Friday afternoon.<\/p>\n

So has that happened? Well, no. Not quite. Obviously.<\/p>\n

NHS funding has increased since 2016, but not as the simple Brexit dividend many voters were told\/lied to about. Staffing shortages and medicine supply issues have also complicated the picture, though.<\/p>\n

The lesson? Never trust anything a bus tells you.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 5\/10<\/p>\n

Red tape<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tWhether it\u2019s metaphorical or literal, no one enjoys dealing with red tape (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

No one likes red tape. It clogs up business processes, makes everyday life admin trickier than it needs to be and looks terrible on Christmas presents.<\/p>\n

Leaving the EU was supposed to cut bureaucracy. For many firms trading with Europe, it did the exact opposite. Customs paperwork, checks and regulatory requirements all increased. <\/p>\n

Domestically, the UK has more freedom to write its own rules, but businesses exporting to the EU have generally found life more complicated.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 3\/10<\/p>\n

Farming<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tYou\u2019re not really a farmer until you start wearing dark green fleece gilets over thick white check cotton shirts (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Giving the EU the wellie boot gave Britain a fair bit of control over its own agricultural policy and subsidies, something many farmers had long wanted. But labour shortages, changing support schemes and tougher trading conditions with Europe have left plenty wondering whether the trade-off was really worth it.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s tricky to assess the state of modern farming in this country, given its complexity. The answer here isn\u2019t exactly black and white. It\u2019s more a sort of muddy cow pat colour.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 5\/10<\/p>\n

Immigration<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tImmigration \u2013 Always a fun topic for conversation to have with friends, family and blokes down the pub (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

The topic of immigration was one of the driving forces of the whole Brexit thing. It was, is and probably always will be a political potato that\u2019s so hot it burns the roof of your mouth just looking at it.<\/p>\n

Looking at it objectively, free movement ended, which was one of the clearest Brexit objectives. If the promise was greater control over immigration policy, that box has been ticked. If the promise was lower immigration, the record levels seen in recent years tell a rather different story. A story that gets people across the political spectrum riled up.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 6\/10<\/p>\n

\u2018Levelling up\u2019<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tHas Manchester levelled up closer towards London\u2019s status? Or has the capital levelled down? (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Supporters argued that Brexit would help rebalance the economy and breathe new life into parts of Britain that had been left behind. Some replacement funding arrived after EU regional grants ended, but it\u2019s difficult to argue the transformation many hoped for has happened.<\/p>\n

The trouble with judging \u2018levelling up\u2019 is that no one seems to agree what level we were all aiming for in the first place. Or how far apart the levels are. Or even what constitutes a level. It\u2019s almost as if politicians talk rubbish, isn\u2019t it? There are levels to their game.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 5\/10<\/p>\n

Fishing<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tFishing is probably one of Brexit\u2019s clearer successes, leaving the industry in something of a net gain (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Now, unless you\u2019re a fisherman or fishmonger, this topic\u2019s probably not going to matter all that much to you. It\u2019s an industry worth less than 0.1% of GDP that ended up symbolising an entire political movement. So given the fanfare it\u2019s worth considering fishing as a metric to some degree.<\/p>\n

Few industries became as symbolic as fishing during Brexit. Britain regained a larger share of fishing rights in its own waters, although the increase was smaller than some campaigners expected and many in the industry remain dissatisfied. A tangible gain, even if it fell a little short of the rhetoric.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 8\/10<\/p>\n

Taking back control<\/p>\n

\t\t\"\"
\n\t\tThe UK and the EU \u2013 no longer on fist-bumping terms (Picture: Getty Images)<\/p>\n

Whether you think Brexit was right or wrong, this was the promise it most clearly delivered. Britain left the EU, Parliament regained full control over domestic law, free movement ended and trade policy returned to Westminster.<\/p>\n

The real debate isn\u2019t whether Britain took back control. The real debate is whether we knew what to do once we\u2019d got it.<\/p>\n

Score<\/strong>: 10\/10<\/p>\n

Ah.<\/p>\n

Well, that settles it. 52%. Debate over then, eh?<\/p>\n

Arrow
\nMORE: Free hand luggage is coming to Europe, but there\u2019s a catch for UK travellers<\/a><\/p>\n

Arrow
\nMORE: Mum charged with manslaughter after brothers, 4 and 2, died in car in 40\u00b0C heat<\/a><\/p>\n

Arrow
\nMORE: Keir Starmer\u2019s departure is the perfect chaotic way to mark 10 years of Brexit<\/a><\/p>\n


\n\t\t\tComment now<\/p>\n

\t\t\tComments
\n\t\t<\/a>
\n\t\t\t\tAdd Metro as a Preferred Source on Google<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\tAdd as preferred source
\n\t\t\t<\/a>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\tAlright Gov<\/p>\n

Straight-talking analysis from Westminster, straight to your inbox.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Cod help us all (Picture: Getty Images) Brexit. Remember that? Fun, wasn\u2019t it? The entire nation bickering, arguing…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1188121,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_share_on_mastodon":"0"},"categories":[5226],"tags":[802,748,2000,299,5187,1699,4884,12,285,16,15],"class_list":["post-1188120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-brexit","tag-brexit","tag-britain","tag-eu","tag-europe","tag-european","tag-european-union","tag-great-britain","tag-news","tag-politics","tag-uk","tag-united-kingdom"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/117219242911016781","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1188120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1188120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1188120\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1188121"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1188120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1188120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1188120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}