More Californians are talking to their therapists through a video screen or by phone than in person, marking a profound shift in how mental health care is delivered as record-setting numbers seek help.<\/p>\n
While patients and providers say teletherapy is effective and easier to get than in-person services, experts in the field noted that teletherapy often requires a skilled mental health practitioner trained to pick up subtle communication cues.<\/p>\n
Almost half of the roughly 4.8 million adults who visited a medical professional for mental health or substance use disorders in 2023 did so exclusively through teletherapy, according to a KFF Health News analysis of the latest data from UCLA\u2019s California Health Interview Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n About 24% of adults used a combination of face-to-face and teletherapy in 2023, while roughly 23% got help exclusively in person, according to the survey of about 20,000 California households.<\/p>\n A recent national study<\/a> of patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs health care system found a similar pattern: Fifty-five percent of mental health care continued to be provided via telemedicine, a figure that spiked after patients shifted to teletherapy by necessity during the covid-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n Teletherapy is certainly more convenient, allowing patients to see their therapists from the comfort of home.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s actually really effective,\u201d said Joshua Heitzmann<\/a>, president of the California Psychological Association<\/a>. \u201cI think part of that is that it just allows more comfortability \u2014 people are willing to work a little bit more when they\u2019re comfortable.\u201d<\/p>\n Studies<\/a> back<\/a> that<\/a> up<\/a>: Teletherapy patients report getting better at rates similar to those receiving in-person therapy.<\/p>\n \u201cResearch has basically shown that there\u2019s no difference between teletherapy versus in-person therapy \u2014 so, basically, as effective as in-person therapy,\u201d said Tao Lin<\/a>, a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania\u2019s Center for the Treatment and Study of Anxiety<\/a>, who recently conducted an analysis of several studies comparing teletherapy and face-to-face therapy.<\/p>\n But Lin said it can be difficult for a therapist to see hand motions or read body language during a video call, which could lead to therapists missing nonverbal cues about their patients\u2019 emotional states. Lin\u2019s most recent research, yet to be published, suggests therapy over the telephone \u201cis less effective than video conferences\u201d due to \u201cmore loss of information.\u201d<\/p>\n And some people have trouble emotionally connecting with a therapist without seeing them in person, Lin said. Technical difficulties, not uncommon, can also interfere with clients building a therapeutic relationship.<\/p>\n Sacramento resident David Bain relies on teletherapy to treat his depression because mobility issues make it difficult for him to visit a therapist in person.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s almost to the point where I wouldn\u2019t be able to get the service if I wasn\u2019t able to get it through telehealth,\u201d said Bain, executive director of NAMI Sacramento<\/a>, a nonprofit that provides support and advocacy to people with mental illness.<\/p>\n Bain said that his one-on-one teletherapy sessions have helped but that he\u2019s had less success with online group therapy. He recently participated in a 10-week dialectical behavior<\/a> therapy class, but he didn\u2019t get the connection and support he received in past in-person group settings, he said.<\/p>\n \u201cThere was probably me and two or three other people that were actually showing ourselves on screen,\u201d he said. \u201cEveryone else had their screens off.\u201d<\/p>\n Teletherapy is increasingly offered through cellphone applications like BetterHelp<\/a> and Talkspace<\/a>. Patients using these applications often pay a subscription fee, which insurance may partly cover, in exchange for regular sessions and contact with therapists.<\/p>\n Eunkyung Jo<\/a>, a researcher at the University of California-Irvine<\/a>, co-authored a study<\/a> published in 2023 that looked at patient reviews of eight of the most popular teletherapy apps. Many patients expressed satisfaction with their therapists, but the team also uncovered negative patterns.<\/p>\n Some patients did not get the therapy they paid for, often due to technical difficulties. Other patients reported their therapists acted disinterested or unprofessional, a finding Jo said could be tied to the relatively low pay therapists earn on some apps.<\/p>\n And several users mentioned in reviews that their therapist suddenly disappeared from the app without explanation. She said therapists in more traditional \u201cpay-as-you-go\u201d arrangements rarely discontinue treatment without warning.<\/p>\n Nikole Benders-Hadi<\/a>, chief medical officer of Talkspace, said patients often can use their insurance to get therapy on the platform, at a typical cost of a $10 copay. Separately, Talkspace spokesperson Jeannine Feyen said salary for therapists has increased since Jo\u2019s study was conducted, and that full-time Talkspace therapists make between $65,000 and $105,000 a year.<\/p>\n At BetterHelp, therapists earn up to $91,000 and the average patient rating last year for a live session on the platform was 4.9 out of 5<\/a>, spokesperson Megan Garner said. A significant majority of patients reported reliable symptom improvement or remission, she added.<\/p>\n The number of Californians visiting a medical professional for mental health issues rose by about 434,000, or 10%, from 2019 to 2023, UCLA data shows. It jumped by nearly 2 million, or 69%, from 2009 through 2023.<\/p>\n Even so, the transition from in-person therapy to teletherapy has left some behind.<\/p>\n The UCLA data shows that Californians living within 200% of the federal poverty level \u2014 for example, a family of four with a household income of about $60,000 or under in 2023 \u2014 were less likely to use teletherapy.<\/p>\n The data also shows that residents in rural areas, where access to telehealth should provide a boon, weren\u2019t using it as much as residents of urban areas.<\/p>\n For example, about 81% of Bay Area residents who visited a medical professional for mental health care in 2023 did so either fully or partially via teletherapy. About 62% of residents in the state\u2019s rural, mountainous counties did the same.<\/p>\n Those disparities are suggestive of gaps seen in remote-work patterns: Wealthier, urban Californians are more likely to work from home<\/a> than lower-income, rural <\/a>residents. By extension, Californians of greater means have more opportunities to arrange online appointments and may be more comfortable with them.<\/p>\n By comparison, low-income folks tend to go into the office for doctor visits, Heitzmann said.<\/p>\n Lower-income and rural Californians may also lack the reliable internet service necessary for good telehealth. A recent KFF Health News analysis<\/a> found millions of Americans live in places with doctor shortages and poor internet access.<\/p>\n Lower-income Californians also are more likely to live in tight quarters<\/a>, making privacy for an intimate therapy session difficult.<\/p>\n Regardless, teletherapy is now dominant. And it\u2019s not just patients who enjoy the convenience. Many therapists have ditched expensive office rents to work from home.<\/p>\n \u201cCovid allowed that,\u201d Heitzmann said. \u201cA lot of folks really just got rid of their offices and were perfectly happy converting their home into some kind of office and doing it all day long.\u201d<\/p>\n This article was produced by KFF Health News<\/a>, which publishes California Healthline<\/a>, an editorially independent service of the California Health Care Foundation<\/a>. <\/p>\n Update:<\/b>This article was revised May 23, 2025, to reflect new salary information provided by Talkspace spokesperson Jeannine Feyen.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"More Californians are talking to their therapists through a video screen or by phone than in person, marking…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":126651,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4317],"tags":[105,218,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-126650","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-mental-health","8":"tag-health","9":"tag-mental-health","10":"tag-uk","11":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114560045049397002","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=126650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/126650\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/126651"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=126650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=126650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=126650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}