{"id":136620,"date":"2025-05-27T18:50:10","date_gmt":"2025-05-27T18:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/136620\/"},"modified":"2025-05-27T18:50:10","modified_gmt":"2025-05-27T18:50:10","slug":"dwp-reveals-the-700000-people-who-will-avoid-starmers-pip-benefits-changes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/136620\/","title":{"rendered":"DWP reveals the 700,000 people who will avoid Starmer\u2019s PIP benefits changes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pensioners will not be affected by Labour\u2019s upcoming changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP)<\/a>, a minister has revealed.<\/p>\n

Currently, around 3.7 million people across England, Wales, and Northern Ireland receive PIP, a benefit designed to assist those facing challenges<\/a> due to long-term physical or mental health issues.<\/p>\n

Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) figures show that some 690,186 people aged between 65 and 79 were receiving the benefit<\/a> in January.<\/p>\n

But the government plans to tighten eligibility for PIP<\/a> as part of a package aimed at getting more working-age people currently on benefits into jobs.<\/p>\n

\"Sir<\/p>\n

Sir Stephen Timms has replied to questions from MPs about PIP (PA Archive)<\/p>\n

In a written response <\/a>to fellow Labour MP Paula Barker\u2019s concerns for pensioners, pensions minister Sir Stephen Timms said: \u201cOur intention is that the new eligibility requirement in PIP in which people must score a minimum of four points in one daily living activity to be eligible for the daily living component, will apply to new claims and award reviews from November 2026, subject to parliamentary approval.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn keeping with existing policy, people of state pension age are not routinely fully reviewed and will not be affected by the proposed changes.\u201d<\/p>\n

In another question, independent MP Apsana Begum <\/a>asked the minister to expand on what would happen to people receiving end-of-life care who are on PIP.<\/p>\n

Sir Stephen replied: \u201cWe recognise that people nearing the end of their life are some of the most vulnerable people in society and need fast-track and unqualified support at this difficult time.<\/p>\n

\u201cPeople who claim, or are in receipt of, PIP, and are nearing the end of their life with 12 months or less to live, will continue to be able to access the enhanced rate of the daily living component of PIP. We will also maintain the existing fast-track route under the special rules for end of life and where claims are currently being cleared in two working days. This fast-track route will not be impacted by the new eligibility requirement for PIP.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Work<\/p>\n

Work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall insisted she will press ahead with measures to cut the welfare bill last week (PA Wire)<\/p>\n

Changes to the health-related benefit formed the bulk of savings in Labour\u2019s \u201cPathways to Work\u201d green paper, with the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) projecting that anticipated changes could impact around 800,000 recipients. However, some independent experts predict the impacts could be even greater.<\/a><\/p>\n

It came as a backbench rebellion over the proposals could spread to more than 100 MPs, some reports have suggested.<\/p>\n

Peter Lamb, the Labour MP for Crawley, told BBC Radio 4\u2019s Westminster Hour he would be \u201cvoting against anything which is going to restrict access to PIP further than it\u2019s currently restricted\u201d.<\/p>\n

Many Labour MPs across different wings of the party are \u201cdeeply uncomfortable\u201d with what ministers are planning, he also said.<\/p>\n

Last week however, the work and pensions secretary insisted she will press ahead<\/a> with measures to cut the welfare bill, claiming the move will address an \u201ceconomic and social crisis\u201d.<\/p>\n

In a speech in London, Liz Kendall said: \u201cWe are the only economy in the G7 whose employment rate still hasn\u2019t returned to pre-pandemic levels, and spending on sickness and disability benefits in most other comparable countries is either stable or falling since the pandemic, yet ours continues to inexorably rise.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere is nothing Labour about accepting the cost of this economic \u2013 but above all, social \u2013 crisis, paid for in people\u2019s life chances and living standards.\u201d<\/p>\n

Elsewhere, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is expected this week to commit to restoring the winter fuel payment in full, as well as scrapping the two-child benefit cap if elected in the future.<\/p>\n

The move is an attempt to outflank Labour with its traditional working-class supporters<\/a>, according to Reform sources.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Pensioners will not be affected by Labour\u2019s upcoming changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a minister has revealed.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":136621,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3093],"tags":[51,59722,59721,474,8414,6232,2499,51898,59720,59719,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-136620","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-department-of-work-and-pensions","10":"tag-eligibility-requirement","11":"tag-finance","12":"tag-labour","13":"tag-mental-health-issues","14":"tag-personal-finance","15":"tag-personal-independence-payment","16":"tag-sir-stephen","17":"tag-stephen-timms","18":"tag-uk","19":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114581302497260033","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136620\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/136621"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}