Your support helps us to tell the story<\/p>\n
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.<\/p>\n
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.<\/p>\n
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.<\/p>\n
Your support makes all the difference.<\/strong>Read more<\/p>\n 1.6 seconds \u2013 the title of a new Discovery+ documentary about a British diving sensation \u2013 is the time it takes for a human body to plunge from the 10m board into a swimming pool. The art of the controlled descent \u2013 falling with style, in Buzz Lightyear terms \u2013 captures the public imagination every four years, when the Olympics roll around, turning these athletes, briefly, into stars. From the tabloid sensation of Greg Louganis to the medal machine Wu Minxia, it is a precision-engineered discipline that requires personality as well as competence. Enter, then, Tom Daley<\/a>.<\/p>\n 1.6 Seconds tells the story of Daley\u2019s two decades in competitive platform diving. <\/a>From the tiny 10-year-old tumbling into the Plymouth pool to his valedictory bronze at last year\u2019s Paris games, via Olympics in Beijing, London, Rio and Tokyo, it is a story of precocious brilliance and the price paid for that early success. \u201cI\u2019ve never had any kind of media training,\u201d Daley reveals, as he sits serenely, commenting on home video footage playing on a big screen. \u201cOther than the fact I\u2019ve had a camera following me around<\/a> since I was 9 or 10 years old.\u201d Those videos, which the team here have revelatory access to, were shot largely by Daley\u2019s father, Rob, a huge figure in his development, who passed away shortly after the Beijing Olympics. This forms the film\u2019s first chapter: Daley, a premature grandee at 31, looking back on Daley, a premature virtuoso, at 10.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a shame that the film isn\u2019t more interested in being a psychological study as the narrative progresses. Five Olympic Games is a lot to fit into an hour and a half, so the structure is straitjacketed by this linearity. We skip from one games to another, pausing only briefly to consider the big life events: bullying at school post-Beijing, the death of his father, coming out as a gay, meeting his husband, and the birth of his children. Introspection on tabloid intrusion (\u201cI look back on it now,\u201d Daley reveals, of paparazzi at his father\u2019s funeral, \u201cand it just feels really abusive\u201d) is rapidly sidelined in favour of the dogged beat-hitting of Daley\u2019s sporting journey. Perhaps this is natural: 1.6 Seconds is a co-production of Warner Bros Discovery, which holds the international broadcast rights to the Olympics, and the Olympics Channel itself. This is a sports documentary, not a documentary about coming of age as a teenage boy. <\/p>\n Yet that elides something essential to the Daley story. Compared to the average Joe (compared to me) he is a remarkable athlete, but compared to other Olympians, his record doesn\u2019t stand out. Three of his five medals were in synchro, yet his partners (Daniel Goodfellow, Matty Lee, and Noah Williams) are barely name-checked. What makes Daley exceptional has always been his public perception: the charismatic wunderkind turned LGBT icon. That has not always been a smooth process. Criticism has been levelled at the 20-year age gap with his husband Dustin Lance Black<\/a> (who describes, here, coming up with the names of their children on their first date, when Daley had just turned 19 and Black was 38), or their use of surrogates for the births of their children, Robbie and Phoenix. All of this would\u2019ve introduced more friction \u2013 more interest \u2013 rather than a romp that feels like cascading down a Wikipedia page.<\/p>\n Perhaps this is a function of Daley serving as executive producer on the film. He is a very measured, deliberate presence; someone who has played the delicate media game since before puberty. Black refers to diving as \u201ca sport where [Daley] could practice his perfectionism\u201d, and that desire for control shines through. Both Daley and Black sound scripted, not even allowing the emotion of more intimate moments to creep in. It makes it serviceable as a retelling, but feels like a missed opportunity, with access to unseen footage and major contributors to Daley\u2019s life like coaches Andy Banks and Jane Figueiredo, to get beneath the surface. \u201cI\u2019m a writer, I could make up happy endings,\u201d Black declares of Daley\u2019s gold in Tokyo. \u201cAnd he had just written the most glorious third act.\u201d If that sounds a little overripe, that\u2019s because it is.<\/p>\n In diving, it is good to make no splash. The same is not true of TV. For all the pleasure viewers will get from reliving the highs (that first medal in London) and lows (crashing out in the Rio semis), 1.6 Seconds fails to answer the core question. Why Tom Daley? Why has this unassuming Devonian become the international face of British athletics? That\u2019s a question that transcends sport; one that, had they tried to answer it, might have painted a fuller, more complex, less hagiographic portrait.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Your support helps us to tell the story From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":149386,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3935],"tags":[77,3943,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-149385","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-movies","8":"tag-entertainment","9":"tag-movies","10":"tag-uk","11":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114608001839286180","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149385"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149385\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/149386"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}