{"id":159811,"date":"2025-06-05T09:07:18","date_gmt":"2025-06-05T09:07:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/159811\/"},"modified":"2025-06-05T09:07:18","modified_gmt":"2025-06-05T09:07:18","slug":"brexit-sabotage-warning-as-new-proposals-clear-commons-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/159811\/","title":{"rendered":"Brexit \u2018sabotage\u2019 warning as new proposals clear Commons"},"content":{"rendered":"

New product safety proposals have moved closer to becoming law, sparking claims they could enable ministers to “sabotage” Brexit<\/a>.<\/p>\n

MPs voted 264 to 99, a majority of 165, to approve the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill<\/a> at its third reading. The bill provides the government with new powers to regulate the marketing and use of goods in the UK post-Brexit.<\/p>\n

However, TUV leader Jim Allister voiced concerns about specific references to “EU<\/a> law” within the bill. He questioned whether this could allow ministers to act against the 2016 referendum result.<\/p>\n

Critics fear the legislation would force UK regulations to automatically align with changes in European Union law, granting ministers “inappropriately wide” powers to rewrite regulations.<\/p>\n

Mr Allister, the MP for North Antrim, told the Commons<\/a>: \u201cThere are aspects of this Bill which I think are democratically dangerous.<\/p>\n

\u201cBecause this Bill gifts to government unbridled capacity to make regulations, with virtually no oversight from this elected House, on matters which touch not just upon the sanctity of our product production, but the sovereignty of this nation.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis Bill, with little attempt at subtlety, is a vehicle which enables a Government, if so minded \u2013 and this one, I fear, might be \u2013 to sabotage Brexit in many ways.<\/p>\n

\u201cI stand to be corrected, but I don\u2019t think a single member of this Government voted for Brexit, and yet that is the settled and declared will of the people, greatest number of people who ever participated in a democratic vote in this nation.<\/p>\n

\u201cYet in the Bill, we have the capacity, particularly through clause 2(7), to dynamically align all our regulations with those of the EU, and to do that without recourse to this House, at the whim of the executive. Whatever the subject matter, that surely is a most unhealthy situation.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"TUV<\/p>\n

TUV leader Jim Allister speaking during a public meeting at Moygashel Orange Hall (Liam McBurney\/PA) (PA Archive)<\/p>\n

Shadow business minister Dame Harriett Baldwin also said: \u201cAs an independent nation, the UK we believe should set its own product regulations to foster innovation, support domestic industry, and not automatically align with EU rules which we no longer have any influence or help to shape.\u201d<\/p>\n

Responding, business minister Justin Madders told the Commons: \u201cThe powers in this Bill give the UK the flexibility to manage its own product regulatory framework.<\/p>\n

\u201cPart of this is of course making sure that the UK can respond to relevant developments in EU law, and this does not mean that the UK is beholden to EU changes, and all regulations will be subject to Parliament oversight.\u201d<\/p>\n

He added that \u201cthe reason why the Bill explicitly references the EU rather than other jurisdictions is because most of our product regulation is of course inherited from EU law\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"New product safety proposals have moved closer to becoming law, sparking claims they could enable ministers to “sabotage”…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":159812,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5226],"tags":[802,748,2000,299,5187,1699,67490,4884,50259,67489,67491,8948,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-159811","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-brexit","8":"tag-brexit","9":"tag-britain","10":"tag-eu","11":"tag-europe","12":"tag-european","13":"tag-european-union","14":"tag-european-union-law","15":"tag-great-britain","16":"tag-jim-allister","17":"tag-metrology-bill","18":"tag-product-regulation","19":"tag-regulations","20":"tag-uk","21":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114629970839211561","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159811\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/159812"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}