{"id":160330,"date":"2025-06-05T13:37:09","date_gmt":"2025-06-05T13:37:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/160330\/"},"modified":"2025-06-05T13:37:09","modified_gmt":"2025-06-05T13:37:09","slug":"labour-using-brexit-to-weaken-nature-laws-mps-say-green-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/160330\/","title":{"rendered":"Labour using Brexit to weaken nature laws, MPs say | Green politics"},"content":{"rendered":"

Labour is using post-Brexit freedoms to override EU nature laws and allow chalk streams<\/a> and nightingale habitats<\/a> to be destroyed, MPs have said.<\/p>\n

The planning and infrastructure bill going through parliament will allow developers to circumvent EU-derived environmental protections and instead pay into a nature restoration fund.<\/p>\n

This would override the habitats directive, which protects animals including otters, salmon and dormice. Under the new bill it will be possible to pay into the fund and build over their habitats.<\/p>\n

The bill also allows potential development of EU-designated sites including sites of special scientific interest and special protection areas.<\/p>\n

This week the Guardian revealed that the bill poses a threat to 5,251 areas<\/a> known as \u201cjewels in the crown\u201d for nature. They include cherished natural landscapes such as the New Forest, the Surrey Heaths, the Peak District Moors and the Forest of Bowland, and rivers such as the Itchen in Hampshire and the Wensum in Norfolk.<\/p>\n

The Office for Environmental Protection, the nature watchdog set up to replace EU checks and balances, has warned<\/a> that the bill would be a \u201cregression\u201d in terms environmental protection.<\/p>\n

Clive Lewis, the Labour MP for Norwich South, said the public did not realise Brexit<\/a> was being used to weaken nature laws.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think people have made the connection about Brexit,\u201d he said. \u201cWhat we, the Labour<\/a> government, are doing with Brexit is using it in such a poor way. We\u2019ve already seen it with water standards, pesticide standards over the last eight years, but this just turbocharges it all.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a sense we are able to get away with it because it\u2019s not what people expect us to do. There is immediate outrage from the public when the Tories do it. People are confused when Labour does it.\u201d<\/p>\n

He said he would be voting against the bill in its current form. \u201cI don\u2019t understand how anyone who is environmentally minded can vote for this bill,\u201d Lewis said.<\/p>\n

Other political parties are planning to try to win over disaffected nature-loving Labour voters who might be disheartened to see their local green spaces concreted over before the next general election.<\/p>\n

Gideon Amos, the Liberal Democrats\u2019 planning and housing spokesperson, said: \u201cThe government seems content to dilute protections of our waterways and local wildlife with vague promises of future benefits and little clarity about when they will materialise. With national landscapes and precious chalk streams disappearing, we need urgent action from the government, working with our European neighbours, to protect vital ecosystems which run right across Europe.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Liberal Democrats have long led the campaign in parliament to clean up our rivers and chalk streams. We will continue to fight for their survival with our amendments to protect chalk streams and natural habitats in this bill.\u201d<\/p>\n

Zack Polanski, the deputy leader of the Green party, said: \u201cLabour are once again showing there\u2019s nothing they won\u2019t learn from Reform. Not only are they content to sell off nature to the highest bidder, they\u2019re only able to do so because they\u2019ve utterly failed to defend the regulations that once protected our environment.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis destruction is only possible because of their utter inaction on making the case for the value of EU environmental protections. From nightingales to chalk streams, our natural habitats deserve so much better than this bill \u2013 and so much better than this nature-destroying Labour party.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Wildlife Trusts said: \u201cThe legislation would significantly weaken important habitat regulations \u2013 rules which have helped to effectively protect wildlife and wild spaces for decades. In so doing the bill risks stripping away vital protections without clear requirements on developers to deliver the nature restoration needed to revive precious landscapes such as chalk streams, wildflower meadows and ancient woodlands, and to protect treasured species like hazel dormice, otters and struggling bird and butterfly species.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Labour is using post-Brexit freedoms to override EU nature laws and allow chalk streams and nightingale habitats to…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":160331,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5226],"tags":[802,748,2000,299,5187,1699,4884,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-160330","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-brexit","8":"tag-brexit","9":"tag-britain","10":"tag-eu","11":"tag-europe","12":"tag-european","13":"tag-european-union","14":"tag-great-britain","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114631032444160199","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160330","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160330"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160330\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/160331"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160330"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160330"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160330"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}