![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/0_Avon-And-Somerset-Police-Hq.jpg\")
(Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service)<\/p>\nThe Avon & Somerset Police sergeant has been barred(Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service)<\/p>\n
A police sergeant who took a second job for two years despite being refused permission has been sacked without notice.<\/p>\n
Sgt Christopher Tearle, who worked for Avon & Somerset Police<\/a> for nearly two decades, was found to have committed gross misconduct<\/a> at a hearing on Friday, June 13.<\/p>\n The 45-year-old dad-of-two, who is based in Radstock, will also be placed on a barred list preventing him from policing and law enforcement again.<\/p>\n He was suspended on an unrelated matter in March 2023 and put in a request to take a paid job at an engineering company the following month.<\/p>\n When this was refused, he appealed to the chief constable who dismissed it in May 2023 and ordered him not to take the work, the misconduct hearing at force headquarters in Portishead<\/a> was told.<\/p>\n But he started at the firm, which cannot be named for legal reasons, in June that year anyway and did not inform the constabulary, and he is still employed there.<\/p>\n Sgt Tearle admitted misconduct but denied gross misconduct.<\/p>\n Barrister Mark Ley-Morgan, representing the force, told the hearing that Chief Constable Sarah Crew\u2019s appeal decision indicated that she was not unsympathetic and suggested other ways to alleviate the impact of being suspended.<\/p>\n But Mr Ley-Morgan said: \u201cThe officer ignored the order to be treated as a lawful order and took paid employment from June 6, 2023, working effectively full time, so he has been drawing two salaries for over two years.<\/p>\n \u201cHe was taking public money for work he was not doing while being paid a full-time job.<\/p>\n \u201cHe knew what he was doing was wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n The barrister said Sgt Tearle should have either stopped working at the business or resigned as a police officer.<\/p>\n He said it was more serious because of his supervisory role as a sergeant who should have set an example, so the only sanction should be dismissal without notice.<\/p>\n According to Mr Ley-Morgan, the officer said in response to the investigation: \u201cI fully accept disregarding the orders of the chief constable.<\/p>\n \u201cRegrettably I found myself in a position where I had to go against the chief constable\u2019s position.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr Ley-Morgan said: \u201cHe has worked for [the company] when he has been expressly instructed not to do so.<\/p>\n \u201cHe has undermined public confidence in the police service.<\/p>\n \u201cThe officer has said he knowingly and intentionally breached that order because he had no choice.<\/p>\n \u201cHe has provided no proof whatsoever that he needed a second job.\u201d<\/p>\n Barrister Julian King, representing Sgt Tearle, said: \u201cThe officer has not sought to hide behind the fact of that employment.<\/p>\n \u201cHe needed to take separate work for his wellbeing.<\/p>\n \u201cHe has a previously unblemished record and career.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr King asked the sanction to be a final written warning and read out character references from the officer\u2019s colleagues, one of whom described him as an \u2018inspirational figure\u2019.<\/p>\n Panel chair Craig Holden ruled that Sgt Tearle did not act dishonestly but did act without integrity and found gross misconduct proved.<\/p>\n Mr Holden said: \u201cThe officer chose to disobey a direct order from the most senior police officer in the force.<\/p>\n \u201cHe is in paid employment while being a fully paid police officer.\u201d<\/p>\n Sgt Teale chose not to give evidence at the hearing.<\/p>\n Head of Avon & Somerset\u2019s professional standards department Superintendent Larisa Hunt said afterwards: \u201cThere is a requirement that all who work within policing report any business interest they may have.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is so it can be reviewed to ensure it does not conflict with police work and responsibilities.<\/p>\n \u201cThe public rightly expects officers to follow the necessary policies in place.<\/p>\n \u201cSgt Tearle knowingly chose to ignore the fact his business interest application had been refused.<\/p>\n \u201cHe appealed that decision and knew that had been rejected too.<\/p>\n \u201cThe public can only have confidence in the police officers who serve them if they demonstrate integrity in their actions.<\/p>\n \u201cSgt Tearle clearly failed to demonstrate this and will not be allowed to work in policing again.\u201d<\/p>\n Try BristolLive Premium for FREE without intrusive ads and brilliant new features<\/p>\n No intrusive adverts, pop-ups or distractions! Just our brilliant content presented in the best way possible.<\/p>\n Get your free one-month trial by visiting the ‘Premium’ tab on the BristolLive app now (auto renews annually at \u00a319.99).<\/p>\n If you haven’t got it already, get started by downloading our app here on iPhone<\/a> or here on Android<\/a>. If you already have the app but can’t see the ‘Premium’ section, you’ll need to check for the latest update. More info here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Avon & Somerset Police sergeant has been barred(Image: Local Democracy Reporting Service) A police sergeant who took…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":172446,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8818],"tags":[9312,381,748,3374,393,4884,285,11945,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-188771","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-bristol","8":"tag-avon-and-somerset-constabulary","9":"tag-bristol","10":"tag-britain","11":"tag-employment","12":"tag-england","13":"tag-great-britain","14":"tag-politics","15":"tag-portishead","16":"tag-uk","17":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114692637696801460","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188771"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188771\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/172446"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}