\t\t\t\t\t\tEmail\t\t\t\t\t\tShare on Email\n\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/GettyImages-2211058841.jpg\")
\t\tEnergy Secretary Ed Miliband has backed the \u201cfight\u201d for net zero. (Photo by Justin Tallis \u2013 WPA Pool\/Getty Images)\t<\/p>\n
The UK government has quietly admitted that renewables and other low-carbon technologies essential to the rapid drive to net zero are more expensive than using fossil fuel, City AM can reveal, which has in turn made energy bills higher for Brits up and down the country.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Labour ministers are expected to double down on expanding the use of green technologies to lower costs as the Treasury and Department for Business and Trade are set to unveil the UK\u2019s industrial strategy next week.<\/p>\n
The blueprint for growing the economy will outline plans to lower energy costs. The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ<\/a>) saw its budget increase by 16 per cent at the Spending Review, with more funding set to go towards nuclear power and clean energy in a bid to remove nearly all fossil fuels from UK electricity production by 2030.\u00a0<\/p>\n But officials working under energy secretary Ed Miliband told the Committee of Public Accounts<\/a>, which scrutinises expenditure by different government bodies, explained electricity prices were higher due to the costs of using \u201clow carbon technologies\u201d rather than oil and gas price shocks<\/a> despite the government linking the development of green technology to more affordable energy bills<\/a>.<\/p>\n The admission came in the minutes for a PAC report, which is publicly available online, detailing the government\u2019s responses to recommendations made on energy policy.\u00a0<\/p>\n The statement explains that high residential electricity prices in the UK do not reflect the \u201ccheaper wholesale price of clean energy\u201d and instead stem from the costs of operating renewable energy such as solar power and offshore wind, as well as other technologies, which may include energy storage methods and energy infrastructure.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cLow carbon technologies can be more expensive to run than fossil-fuel powered alternatives,\u201d the government\u2019s response read.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThe price disparity between electricity and gas needs to be addressed to make it more attractive for consumers to install clean technologies like heat pumps.\u201d<\/p>\n It follows a similar admission earlier this year that net zero policies would push up energy bills in the \u201cshort to medium term\u201d according to a page on the government\u2019s website, as first reported in the Telegraph<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n Data published in March showed standard electricity bills reaching \u00a31,067 last year compared to \u00a3814 for gas, meaning average energy bills<\/a> were \u00a31,881 in 2024.\u00a0<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\tRead more<\/p>\n \t\t\tEnd net zero levies raising energy bills, CBI boss to demand<\/a><\/p>\n Manufacturers paid just under twice as much for electricity as they did for either gas or other fuels last year, with UK industrial electricity bills nearly 50 per cent higher than those seen in France and Germany and roughly four times higher than in the US.\u00a0<\/p>\n Net zero costs overlooked<\/p>\n Oxford University\u2019s Professor Dieter Helm has said that estimates on the impacts of renewable energy have historically overlooked the cost of preventing issues surrounding unreliable weather, for example.\u00a0<\/p>\n Keith Bell, holder of the Scottish Power Chair in Future Power Systems at the University of Strathclyde, has said that a power system \u201cdominated by renewables\u201d could still help to reduce costs overall as demand can be \u201creliably\u201d met through clean energy.\u00a0<\/p>\n City AM understands the government has not yet made a decision on how it plans to rebalance gas and electricity prices. <\/p>\n Other economists, including Bank of England deputy governor Sarah Breeden, have warned that Brits were paying more due to the costs of the energy transition policies. <\/p>\n One of the biggest critics of the government\u2019s ambition to decarbonise the energy grid is INEOS owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who has blamed soaring energy bills on a \u201cnegative political attitude towards oil and gas\u201d risking the \u201cextinction\u201d of major producers of goods in the UK.\u00a0<\/p>\n Confederation of British Industry (CBI) chief executive Rain Newton-Smith was the latest industry voice to call on ministers to find a way to shield the costs<\/a> of net zero policies from firms.\u00a0<\/p>\n A government spokesperson said: \u201cThrough our sprint to clean power, we will get off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel markets \u2013 protecting business and household finances with clean, homegrown energy that we control.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe are exploring a range of options for rebalancing gas and electricity prices \u2013 with securing better outcomes for consumers at the heart of our approach, and will set out further details in due course.\u201d<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\tRead more<\/p>\n