<\/p>\n
A car drives between trees in a small park in Frankfurt, Germany, April 8, 2024. (AP Photo\/Michael Probst, File)<\/p>\n
A car drives between trees in a small park in Frankfurt, Germany, April 8, 2024. (AP Photo\/Michael Probst, File)<\/p>\n
Read More<\/p>\n
Carbon offsetting essentially means investing in tree planting or other environmental projects to attempt to compensate for carbon emissions. Trees are one of the cheapest ways to do this because they naturally suck up planet-warming carbon. Fossil fuel corporations, along with other companies and institutions, have promoted tree-planting as key part of carbon offset programs in recent years.<\/p>\n
For example, TotalEnergies, a global energy company, said in a statement that it is \u201cinvesting heavily in carbon capture and storage (CCS) and nature-based solutions (NBS) projects.\u201d<\/p>\n
To do their calculations, the researchers looked at the 200 largest holders of fossil fuel reserves \u2014 the fuel that companies promise shareholders they can extract in the future \u2014 and calculated how much carbon dioxide would be released if this fuel is burned. The researchers also focused solely on tree planting because the expense and technological development needed for other forms of carbon capture are still mostly cost-prohibitive.<\/p>\n
Forestry expert \u00c9liane Ubalijoro, who was not involved with the research, called the study \u201celegant.\u201d<\/p>\n
It \u201cgives people a sense of proportion around carbon,\u201d said Ubalijoro, CEO of CIFOR-ICRAF, an international forestry research center.<\/p>\n
But she cautioned against oversimplifying the equation by looking only at carbon capture, noting that tree planting done right can foster food security and biodiversity and protect communities from natural disasters.<\/p>\n
The paper effectively makes the point that it\u2019s financially impossible to offset enough carbon to compensate for future fossil fuel burning, said Daphne Yin, director of land policy at Carbon180, where her team advocates for U.S. policy support for land-based carbon removal. And the idea that companies would ever be required to account for the downstream emissions from the fossil fuel they extract is a \u201cfantasy,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
The idea of planting trees is appealing to the public and to politicians because it\u2019s tangible \u2014 people can literally see the carbon being incorporated into branches and leaves as a tree grows, Friggens said. But she says other methods shouldn\u2019t be overlooked \u2014 microbes underground store carbon too, but they can\u2019t be seen.<\/p>\n
And it\u2019s a physically and mathematically inescapable fact, illustrated in part by this study, that there\u2019s no getting around it \u2014 we have to stop emitting carbon, said Jonathan Foley, the executive director of Project Drawdown, who also was not part of the study. Carbon emissions are like an overflowing bathtub, he says: Before you start cleaning up, you have to turn off the water.<\/p>\n
\u201cTrees are the sponges and the mops we use to clean up the mess,\u201d he said. \u201cBut if the taps are still running and the water\u2019s pouring out over the edges of your bathtub, destroying your bathroom and your home, maybe you\u2019ve got to learn to turn off the taps too.\u201d<\/p>\n
___<\/p>\n
Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling<\/a> and Bluesky @melinawalling.bsky.social<\/a>.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n The Associated Press\u2019 climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP\u2019s standards<\/a> for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Planting trees has plenty of benefits, but this popular carbon-removal method alone can\u2019t possibly counteract the planet-warming emissions…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":197659,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3843],"tags":[19430,51,48181,7029,8616,2311,80151,728,80150,80147,80149,80148,70,3695,28671,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-197658","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-associated-press","9":"tag-business","10":"tag-central-america","11":"tag-climate","12":"tag-climate-and-environment","13":"tag-climate-change","14":"tag-daphne-yin","15":"tag-environment","16":"tag-jonathan-foley","17":"tag-liane-ubalijoro","18":"tag-melina-walling","19":"tag-nina-friggens","20":"tag-science","21":"tag-sustainability","22":"tag-trees","23":"tag-uk","24":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114711154842540663","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=197658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/197658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/197659"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=197658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=197658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=197658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}