{"id":20651,"date":"2025-04-15T01:05:11","date_gmt":"2025-04-15T01:05:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/20651\/"},"modified":"2025-04-15T01:05:11","modified_gmt":"2025-04-15T01:05:11","slug":"i-trained-with-russian-diplomats-i-can-tell-you-how-they-work","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/20651\/","title":{"rendered":"I Trained With Russian Diplomats. I Can Tell You How They Work"},"content":{"rendered":"

Last week, while Russian missiles rained down on Ukrainian cities, the Kremlin\u2019s special envoy Kirill Dmitriev landed<\/a> in Washington with an offer<\/a> of economic cooperation. To many, this seemed like cognitive dissonance. To me, it felt eerily familiar. Charm the West with trade. Threaten neighbors in the background. Speak diplomacy, practice coercion. That isn\u2019t just hypocrisy, it\u2019s a strategy. It\u2019s the realpolitik<\/a> we were trained to believe in and to carry out.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Morgenthau. Waltz. Primakov. Mearsheimer.
Morgenthau. Waltz. Primakov. Mearsheimer.<\/p>\n

I could recite them in my sleep \u2014 just like my grandparents once recited Lenin and Marx.<\/p>\n

That was the rhythm of life at MGIMO,<\/a> Russia\u2019s elite diplomatic academy and my alma mater. Every course, no matter the topic, bowed to the same deities of geopolitical realism. We were soaked in realpolitik as if the Cold War had never ended and trained to act accordingly.<\/p>\n

People often ask me why Russian diplomats are so hard to deal with. My answer as an insider of this system is simple: to understand Russian diplomacy, you need to understand how Russian diplomats are made. And that means understanding MGIMO. It is the Hogwarts<\/a> of the Russian foreign policy elite, the place where the worldview of Russian diplomats is shaped, hammered in, and sealed.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Unlike the West, where diplomats are usually brought up on liberal institutionalism \u2014 the idea that diplomacy is about cooperation \u2014 MGIMO teaches the opposite: offensive realism. Not the nuanced academic kind, but its hardened, ossified version where power is truth, might makes right, and “spheres of influence” are gospel.<\/p>\n

From day one, we were taught that Russia is and must remain a derzhava <\/a>\u2014 a \u201cgreat power.\u201d Not just one country among many, but a pole in a multipolar world. A country destined to challenge the West. That belief \u2014 fused with resentment, imperial nostalgia, and a constant sense of grievance \u2014 forms the backbone of Russian diplomacy.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Enter the Primakov Doctrine.<\/a>\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yevgeny Primakov, a former foreign minister, offered an answer to U.S. unipolarity: a \u201cstrategic triangle\u201d<\/a> of Russia, China and India. This wasn\u2019t diplomacy as dialogue but power-balancing disguised as vision \u2014 a blueprint for rivalry. His ideas shaped generations of diplomats who came to see the world as a chessboard of empires.<\/p>\n

\t\topinion
\n\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\tHere\u2019s Why More Russians Don\u2019t Read Independent Journalism
\n\t\t\tRead more
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

There was almost no space for alternative ways of thinking at MGIMO.<\/p>\n

Liberalism? Mocked.\u00a0Constructivism? Ignored.
Postcolonialism or feminism? Unthinkable.<\/p>\n

MGIMO\u2019s curriculum was Cold War nostalgia meets KGB street smarts meets legal gymnastics. All this is tailor-made for President Vladimir Putin\u2019s worldview. Everything revolved around ponyatiya (understood codes), honor, betrayal and (dis)trust.<\/p>\n

At MGIMO, we were taught to cite international law while violating its spirit, to defend norms while dismantling them and to speak of peace while justifying and waging wars. Georgia. Syria. Ukraine. These weren\u2019t deviations. We deployed whichever claim of \u201cTerritorial integrity<\/a>\u201d or \u201cself-determination<\/a>\u201d suited the day\u2019s talking point. This is Russian anti-normism<\/a> in action.<\/p>\n

Yet, I can\u2019t lie: the technical training was impeccable. Languages, etiquette, international law, treaties and the dates of battles. I still impress my Western colleagues with my knowledge of the Helsinki Accords or marine law. But what we were not taught \u2014 ever \u2014 was how to engage with this knowledge critically. For me, that came later through Western education and painful conversations with fellow MGIMO alumni. I had so much to unlearn.<\/p>\n

That said, most of my classmates weren\u2019t true believers. Some came from poor families in small towns, scraping together money just to make it in Moscow. MGIMO was a ticket to a career, a diplomatic passport and a future. Westerners with strong passports and freedom of movement don\u2019t always get that.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Many MGIMO students didn\u2019t freely choose the system. The system chose some of us: and once you\u2019re in, getting out is nearly impossible. I know for a fact that some tried to change it from within. Most were crushed. Silenced. Scared.<\/p>\n

I got out. I rebelled. But I was lucky.<\/p>\n

They weren\u2019t. And I don\u2019t blame them.<\/p>\n

\t\topinion
\n\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\tRussia\u2019s Businessmen Are Natural Opponents of Putin. They Just Don\u2019t Know It Yet
\n\t\t\tRead more
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

Still, apart from the true believers in Russia\u2019s unique mission (and yes, there were a few), there were others at MGIMO with Western educations, dual citizenships and family wealth who still chose to serve the system. That\u2019s where I draw the line. They had a choice and stayed. That, I cannot forgive.<\/p>\n

Maybe I\u2019m too emotional. Maybe you \u2014 Western diplomats and politicians \u2014 must be more rational. You have to engage, even now, for the sake of the future. But don\u2019t mistake performance for principle.<\/p>\n

This is not just a personal reasoning. It\u2019s a warning for Western policymakers. If the West wants to negotiate effectively with the Russian state, it must first understand the psychological architecture of its diplomacy. Dialogue will not succeed on liberal terms \u2014 it must be grounded in realism, deterrence, and strategic clarity. You cannot appeal to shared norms when the other side sees norms as tools to be gamed. You cannot assume diplomacy is about trust when the training teaches distrust as doctrine.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yes, MGIMO breeds a kind of bureaucratic thoughtlessness \u2014 what Hannah Arendt once called the \u201cbanality of evil.\u201d I\u2019ve seen it. I\u2019m scared of it. But I\u2019ve also seen cracks in the walls. There are people behind those walls, watching, thinking, hoping. Don\u2019t write them all off. Don\u2019t speak only the language of sanctions and ultimatums. Learn to speak their language \u2014 not to excuse, but to understand what they are saying. Not to forgive, but to prepare for what comes next. That doesn\u2019t mean becoming a Putinversteher \u2014 German shorthand for those who rationalize Putin\u2019s actions under the guise of understanding. It means recognizing the system for what it is and the people inside it for who they actually are and what they might become.<\/p>\n

Remember: those of us who made it out are not the rule. We\u2019re the exception. For me, escaping the system cost a career, a stable life and a network of friends. In the end, it cost me my homeland.<\/p>\n

People like me walked away from Putin\u2019s diplomatic machine and we can teach the world how to handle it.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThe views expressed in opinion pieces do not necessarily reflect the position of The Moscow Times.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

A Message from The Moscow Times:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dear readers,<\/p>\n

We are facing unprecedented challenges. Russia’s Prosecutor General’s Office has designated The Moscow Times as an “undesirable” organization, criminalizing our work and putting our staff at risk of prosecution. This follows our earlier unjust labeling as a “foreign agent.”<\/p>\n

These actions are direct attempts to silence independent journalism in Russia. The authorities claim our work “discredits the decisions of the Russian leadership.” We see things differently: we strive to provide accurate, unbiased reporting on Russia.<\/p>\n

We, the journalists of The Moscow Times, refuse to be silenced. But to continue our work, we need your help<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Your support, no matter how small, makes a world of difference. If you can, please support us monthly starting from just $2. It’s quick to set up, and every contribution makes a significant impact.<\/p>\n

By supporting The Moscow Times, you’re defending open, independent journalism in the face of repression. Thank you for standing with us.<\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\tContinue\n\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t\"paiment<\/p>\n

Not ready to support today?
Remind me later.<\/p>\n

\u00d7<\/p>\n

\t\tRemind me next month<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n\t\t\tThank you! Your reminder is set.\n\t\t<\/p>\n

\t\t\tWe will send you one reminder email a month from now. For details on the personal data we collect and how it is used, please see our Privacy Policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Last week, while Russian missiles rained down on Ukrainian cities, the Kremlin\u2019s special envoy Kirill Dmitriev landed in…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":20652,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7655],"tags":[5293,4609,332],"class_list":{"0":"post-20651","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-russia","8":"tag-diplomacy","9":"tag-international-relations","10":"tag-russia"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114339297868336715","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20651\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}