{"id":24560,"date":"2025-04-16T10:58:16","date_gmt":"2025-04-16T10:58:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/24560\/"},"modified":"2025-04-16T10:58:16","modified_gmt":"2025-04-16T10:58:16","slug":"hamiltonian-engineering-of-collective-xyz-spin-models-in-an-optical-cavity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/24560\/","title":{"rendered":"Hamiltonian engineering of collective XYZ spin models in an optical cavity"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Browaeys, A. & Lahaye, T. Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16<\/b>, 132\u2013142 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Geier, S. et al. Floquet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system. Science 374<\/b>, 1149\u20131152 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wu, X. et al. A concise review of Rydberg atom based quantum computation and quantum simulation. Chin. Phys. B 30<\/b>, 020305 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bohn, J. L., Rey, A. M. & Ye, J. Cold molecules: progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quantum matter. Science 357<\/b>, 1002\u20131010 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, J.-R. et al. Tunable itinerant spin dynamics with polar molecules. Nature 614<\/b>, 70\u201374 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, J. et al. Observation of a discrete time crystal. Nature 543<\/b>, 217\u2013220 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Monroe, C. et al. Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93<\/b>, 025001 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mivehvar, F., Piazza, F., Donner, T. & Ritsch, H. Cavity QED with quantum gases: new paradigms in many-body physics. Adv. Phys. 70<\/b>, 1\u2013153 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Choi, J. et al. Robust dynamic Hamiltonian engineering of many-body spin systems. Phys. Rev. X 10<\/b>, 031002 (2020).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Munns, J. H., Orphal-Kobin, L., Pieplow, G. & Schr\u00f6der, T. in Photonic Quantum Technologies: Science and Applications (ed. Benyoucef, M.) Ch. 19 (Wiley, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bloch, I., Dalibard, J. & Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80<\/b>, 885\u2013964 (2008).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sch\u00e4fer, F., Fukuhara, T., Sugawa, S., Takasu, Y. & Takahashi, Y. Tools for quantum simulation with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2<\/b>, 411\u2013425 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gross, C. & Bloch, I. Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science 357<\/b>, 995\u20131001 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Steinert, L.-M. et al. Spatially tunable spin interactions in neutral atom arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130<\/b>, 243001 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    S\u00f8rensen, A. S. & M\u00f8lmer, K. Entangling atoms in bad cavities. Phys. Rev. A 66<\/b>, 022314 (2002).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Borregaard, J., Davis, E. J., Bentsen, G. S., Schleier-Smith, M. H. & S\u00f8rensen, A. S. One- and two-axis squeezing of atomic ensembles in optical cavities. New J. Phys. 19<\/b>, 093021 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, Y.-C., Zhou, X.-F., Zhou, X., Guo, G.-C. & Zhou, Z.-W. Cavity-assisted single-mode and two-mode spin-squeezed states via phase-locked atom-photon coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118<\/b>, 083604 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Luo, C. et al. Momentum-exchange interactions in a Bragg atom interferometer suppress Doppler dephasing. Science 384<\/b>, 551\u2013556 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kitagawa, M. & Ueda, M. Squeezed spin states. Phys. Rev. A 47<\/b>, 5138\u20135143 (1993).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shirasaki, M. & Haus, H. A. Squeezing of pulses in a nonlinear interferometer. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7<\/b>, 30\u201334 (1990).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sackett, C. A. et al. Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature 404<\/b>, 256\u2013259 (2000).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Benhelm, J., Kirchmair, G., Roos, C. F. & Blatt, R. Towards fault-tolerant quantum computing with trapped ions. Nat. Phys. 4<\/b>, 463\u2013466 (2008).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E., Est\u00e8ve, J. & Oberthaler, M. K. Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit. Nature 464<\/b>, 1165\u20131169 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Riedel, M. F. et al. Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology. Nature 464<\/b>, 1170\u20131173 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leroux, I. D., Schleier-Smith, M. H. & Vuleti\u0107, V. Implementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104<\/b>, 073602 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leroux, I. D., Schleier-Smith, M. H. & Vuleti\u0107, V. Orientation-dependent entanglement lifetime in a squeezed atomic clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104<\/b>, 250801 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Baumann, K., Guerlin, C., Brennecke, F. & Esslinger, T. Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity. Nature 464<\/b>, 1301\u20131306 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kroeze, R. M., Guo, Y., Vaidya, V. D., Keeling, J. & Lev, B. L. Spinor self-ordering of a quantum gas in a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121<\/b>, 163601 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Davis, E. J. et al. Protecting spin coherence in a tunable Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125<\/b>, 060402 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Song, C. et al. Generation of multicomponent atomic Schr\u00f6dinger cat states of up to 20 qubits. Science 365<\/b>, 574\u2013577 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kalinin, N. et al. Quantum-enhanced interferometer using Kerr squeezing. Nanophotonics 12<\/b>, 2945\u20132952 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Muessel, W. et al. Twist-and-turn spin squeezing in Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 92<\/b>, 023603 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chaudhury, S. et al. Quantum control of the hyperfine spin of a Cs atom ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99<\/b>, 163002 (2007).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, Z. et al. Improving metrology with quantum scrambling. Science 380<\/b>, 1381\u20131384 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wang, M. et al. Two-axis-twisting spin squeezing by multipass quantum erasure. Phys. Rev. A 96<\/b>, 013823 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hamley, C. D., Gerving, C. S., Hoang, T. M., Bookjans, E. M. & Chapman, M. S. Spin-nematic squeezed vacuum in a quantum gas. Nat. Phys. 8<\/b>, 305\u2013308 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Luo, X.-Y. et al. Deterministic entanglement generation from driving through quantum phase transitions. Science 355<\/b>, 620\u2013623 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Miller, C. et al. Two-axis twisting using Floquet-engineered XYZ spin models with polar molecules. Nature 633<\/b>, 332\u2013337 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Greve, G. P., Luo, C., Wu, B. & Thompson, J. K. Entanglement-enhanced matter-wave interferometry in a high-finesse cavity. Nature 610<\/b>, 472\u2013477 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Finger, F. et al. Spin- and momentum-correlated atom pairs mediated by photon exchange and seeded by vacuum fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132<\/b>, 093402 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Giltner, D. M., McGowan, R. W. & Lee, S. A. Atom interferometer based on Bragg scattering from standing light waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75<\/b>, 2638\u20132641 (1995).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Parker, R. H., Yu, C., Zhong, W., Estey, B. & M\u00fcller, H. Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the standard model. Science 360<\/b>, 191\u2013195 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Morel, L., Yao, Z., Clad\u00e9, P. & Guellati-Kh\u00e9lifa, S. Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion. Nature 588<\/b>, 61\u201365 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pedrozo-Pe\u00f1afiel, E. et al. Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition. Nature 588<\/b>, 414\u2013418 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Robinson, J. M. et al. Direct comparison of two spin-squeezed optical clock ensembles at the 10\u221217 level. Nat. Phys. 20<\/b>, 208\u2013213 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wasilewski, W. et al. Quantum noise limited and entanglement-assisted magnetometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104<\/b>, 133601 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Koschorreck, M., Napolitano, M., Dubost, B. & Mitchell, M. W. Sub-projection-noise sensitivity in broadband atomic magnetometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104<\/b>, 093602 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Muessel, W., Strobel, H., Linnemann, D., Hume, D. B. & Oberthaler, M. K. Scalable spin squeezing for quantum-enhanced magnetometry with Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113<\/b>, 103004 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    McGrew, W. et al. Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level. Nature 564<\/b>, 87\u201390 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Norcia, M. A. et al. Cavity-mediated collective spin-exchange interactions in a strontium superradiant laser. Science 361<\/b>, 259\u2013262 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mu\u00f1oz Arias, M. H., Deutsch, I. H. & Poggi, P. M. Phase-space geometry and optimal state preparation in quantum metrology with collective spins. PRX Quantum 4<\/b>, 020314 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kajtoch, D. & Witkowska, E. Quantum dynamics generated by the two-axis countertwisting Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. A 92<\/b>, 013623 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, Z., Bohnet, J. G., Weiner, J. M. & Thompson, J. K. General formalism for evaluating the impact of phase noise on Bloch vector rotations. Phys. Rev. A 86<\/b>, 032313 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hu, J. et al. Vacuum spin squeezing. Phys. Rev. A 96<\/b>, 050301 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Borregaard, J., Davis, E., Bentsen, G. S., Schleier-Smith, M. H. & S\u00f8rensen, A. S. One-and two-axis squeezing of atomic ensembles in optical cavities. New J. Phys. 19<\/b>, 093021 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hosten, O., Engelsen, N. J., Krishnakumar, R. & Kasevich, M. A. Measurement noise 100 times lower than the quantum-projection limit using entangled atoms. Nature 529<\/b>, 505 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cox, K. C., Greve, G. P., Weiner, J. M. & Thompson, J. K. Deterministic squeezed states with collective measurements and feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116<\/b>, 093602 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meier, E. J., An, F. A. & Gadway, B. Observation of the topological soliton state in the Su\u2013Schrieffer\u2013Heeger model. Nat. Commun. 7<\/b>, 13986 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    An, F. A., Meier, E. J., Ang\u2019ong\u2019a, J. & Gadway, B. Correlated dynamics in a synthetic lattice of momentum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120<\/b>, 040407 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meier, E. J. et al. Observation of the topological Anderson insulator in disordered atomic wires. Science 362<\/b>, 929\u2013933 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    An, F. A. et al. Nonlinear dynamics in a synthetic momentum-state lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127<\/b>, 130401 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    L\u00e9onard, J., Morales, A., Zupancic, P., Esslinger, T. & Donner, T. Supersolid formation in a quantum gas breaking a continuous translational symmetry. Nature 543<\/b>, 87\u201390 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    L\u00e9onard, J., Morales, A., Zupancic, P., Donner, T. & Esslinger, T. Monitoring and manipulating Higgs and Goldstone modes in a supersolid quantum gas. Science 358<\/b>, 1415\u20131418 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schuster, S., Wolf, P., Ostermann, S., Slama, S. & Zimmermann, C. Supersolid properties of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a ring resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124<\/b>, 143602 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ritsch, H., Domokos, P., Brennecke, F. & Esslinger, T. Cold atoms in cavity-generated dynamical optical potentials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85<\/b>, 553\u2013601 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Landini, M. et al. Formation of a spin texture in a quantum gas coupled to a cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120<\/b>, 223602 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rosa-Medina, R. et al. Observing dynamical currents in a non-Hermitian momentum lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128<\/b>, 143602 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Colella, E., Kosior, A., Mivehvar, F. & Ritsch, H. Open quantum system simulation of Faraday\u2019s induction law via dynamical instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128<\/b>, 070603 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Browaeys, A. & Lahaye, T. Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16, 132\u2013142 (2020). Article\u00a0…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24561,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3845],"tags":[11701,15188,11700,11705,11704,3968,11699,15189,11702,11703,74,15190,15191,15192,70,11698,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-24560","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-atomic","9":"tag-atomic-and-molecular-interactions-with-photons","10":"tag-classical-and-continuum-physics","11":"tag-complex-systems","12":"tag-condensed-matter-physics","13":"tag-general","14":"tag-mathematical-and-computational-physics","15":"tag-matter-waves-and-particle-beams","16":"tag-molecular","17":"tag-optical-and-plasma-physics","18":"tag-physics","19":"tag-quantum-metrology","20":"tag-quantum-optics","21":"tag-quantum-simulation","22":"tag-science","23":"tag-theoretical","24":"tag-uk","25":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24560\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}