{"id":255030,"date":"2025-07-11T02:22:24","date_gmt":"2025-07-11T02:22:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/255030\/"},"modified":"2025-07-11T02:22:24","modified_gmt":"2025-07-11T02:22:24","slug":"shock-twist-emerges-in-danny-rohls-return-to-sheffield-wednesday","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/255030\/","title":{"rendered":"Shock twist emerges in Danny Rohl’s return to Sheffield Wednesday"},"content":{"rendered":"

Another factor has emerged concerning the future of Danny R\u00f6hl at Sheffield Wednesday.<\/strong><\/p>\n

It was reported<\/a> earlier this week that the German was preparing to come back to his role with the Owls<\/a> after it became increasingly likely that a takeover deal could be completed within weeks.<\/p>\n

This came as a huge shock, after R\u00f6hl made it clear<\/a> in April that he wanted to exit Hillsborough before not returning for pre-season training.<\/p>\n

However, the situation has taken yet another twist.<\/p>\n

Sheffield Wednesday players oppose Danny R\u00f6hl decision<\/p>\n

\"Danny<\/p>\n

It has now been revealed that Sheffield Wednesday\u2019s<\/a> squad aren\u2019t keen on R\u00f6hl remaining as manager.<\/p>\n

As per the Sheffield Star<\/a>, a meeting has taken place between the players and staff at their pre-season camp at St. George\u2019s Park, regarding the German\u2019s return.<\/p>\n

The outcome was that they would prefer it if he didn\u2019t come back, with the reasoning being that too much had happened since the end of last season, including his absence from the preparations for next term.<\/p>\n\n\n

Danny Rohl’s record as Sheffield Wednesday manager (as per Transfermarkt<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n

Games<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n

89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n

Won<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n

34<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n

Drawn<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n

19<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n

Lost<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n

36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\n

Win percentage<\/p>\n<\/td>\n\n

38.2%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

It\u2019s reported <\/a>that it is a substantial portion of the crop that wouldn\u2019t welcome R\u00f6hl, which complicates matters even further for the Owls.<\/p>\n

This comes after it was confirmed that Henrik Pedersen had agreed to extend his stay as assistant manager, with the expectation being that he would replace R\u00f6hl once the situation was finalised.<\/p>\n

It is now reported<\/a> that Pedersen\u2019s decision has nothing to do with a potential return by the current Wednesday boss, with the two not in regular communication.<\/p>\n

R\u00f6hl has been linked to clubs such as Southampton<\/a>, Middlesbrough<\/a>, RB Leipzig<\/a>, Wolfsburg<\/a> and Werder Bremen<\/a> this summer, but he has been unable to find a new job due to his high release clause.<\/p>\n

Danny R\u00f6hl twist another blow for Sheffield Wednesday supporters<\/p>\n

\"Sheffield<\/p>\n

For a brief moment, there looked to be a glimmer of hope for Wednesday supporters after suffering such a nightmarish summer.<\/p>\n

With news of a takeover imminent<\/a> and R\u00f6hl set to remain in his position, there finally seemed to be an end to the madness at Hillsborough.<\/p>\n

However, that now doesn\u2019t seem to be the case, with the squad not keen to see R\u00f6hl remain in his position.<\/p>\n

Time will tell how this situation is resolved, but it is yet another headache for the Owls to deal with this summer.<\/p>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n

\"Danny<\/p>\n

\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

Related<\/p>\n

\t\t
\n\t\t\t“I am absolutely gobsmacked” – Reaction given to huge Sheffield Wednesday, Danny Rohl twist
\n\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

FLW Fan Pundit Patrick reacts to the huge news that Danny R\u00f6hl is set for a return to the helm at Sheffield Wednesday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Another factor has emerged concerning the future of Danny R\u00f6hl at Sheffield Wednesday. It was reported earlier this…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":255031,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8817],"tags":[748,393,4884,1620,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-255030","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sheffield","8":"tag-britain","9":"tag-england","10":"tag-great-britain","11":"tag-sheffield","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114832221790122727","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=255030"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/255030\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/255031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=255030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=255030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=255030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}