Last, but not least, I didn’t come up with “MechaHitler.” No, when suggested to Grok, it adopted the name for its own. The slogan of Musk’s artificial intelligence startup, xAI, “AI for all humanity,” is ringing hollow.<\/p>\n
What was that about AI being the best thing since sliced bread? I don’t think so!<\/p>\n
By Tuesday night, X had deleted most of the offensive posts and implemented new measures<\/a> to block hate speech. xAI said Wednesday it was working to remove any “inappropriate” posts.<\/p>\n Musk: Grok was ‘too compliant’<\/p>\n So, why did Grok turn into a hatemonger? Musk claims it was because Grok was “too compliant to user prompts”<\/a> and “too eager to please and be manipulated,” and promised that these vulnerabilities were being addressed.<\/p>\n Really? It was Grok’s fault? It’s a program. It does what Musk’s programmers told it to do. They, in turn, might say they were doing what Musk had asked for.<\/p>\n Earlier, in June, Grok answered a user who asked about American political violence, telling that user that the “data suggests right-wing political violence has been more frequent and deadly.” Musk weighed in on this, remarking: “Major fail, as this is objectively false<\/a>. Grok is parroting legacy media. Working on it.” Spoiler alert. Grok got it right and Musk got it wrongRight-wing Americans are responsible for most political violence<\/a>.<\/p>\n Grok’s prompt commands were then adjusted \u2013 on July 6 and July 7<\/a> \u2013 to include “The response should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect<\/a>, as long as they are well substantiated.” Grok was also told to: “Assume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased.” This columnist would argue that this led directly to Grok becoming a Nazi. Just like, one is tempted to say, much of X’s audience.<\/p>\n You see, unlike the older large language models’ (LLMs) AI engines, such as OpenAI and Perplexity, Grok aggressively uses retrieval augmented generation (RAG) to make sure it’s operating with the most recent data. And, you may well ask, where does it get this fresh, new information? Why, it gets its “facts” in real-time data from X<\/a>, and, under Musk’s baton, X has become increasingly right-wing<\/a>.<\/p>\n Thus, as AI expert Nate B Jones puts it, “This architectural choice to hook Grok up to X creates an inherent vulnerability<\/a>: Every toxic post, conspiracy theory, and hate-filled rant on X becomes potential input for Grok’s responses.” Combine this with X promoting Musk and other rightist figures to its readers, including Grok, and, without any significant guardrails, Grok became a ranting Nazi.<\/p>\n As I’m fond of saying about AI, Garbage In, Garbage Out<\/a> (GIGO). Grok’s recent plunge into far-right insanity is just the latest example. It’s also a blaringly loud alarm that there’s nothing objective about any AI model and its associated programs. They merely spit back out what they’ve been fed on. Loosen and tweak their “ethical” rules, and any one of them can go off the deep end.<\/p>\n Furthermore, as Jones points out, the entire process, from start to finish, was handled poorly. There was clearly no beta testing, “no feature flags, no canary deployments, no staged rollouts.” One of the basic rules of programming is never to release anything into production without thorough testing. This isn’t just developer incompetence. It’s a complete failure from the top down.<\/p>\n![\"tay](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/tay_face.jpg\")
\nMicrosoft’s bigoted teen bot flirts with illegali-Tay in brief comeback
\nFROM THE ARCHIVES<\/a><\/p>\n