Visitors to the United States will need to pay a new fee to enter the country, according to the Trump administration\u2019s recently enacted bill.<\/p>\n
A provision in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act<\/a> states all visitors who need nonimmigrant visas to enter the U.S.\u2014tourists, business travelers and international students, to name a few\u2014must pay a \u201cvisa integrity fee,\u201d currently priced at $250. The fee cannot be waived or reduced, but travelers are able to get their fees reimbursed, the provision states.<\/p>\n All told, the Congressional Budget Office estimates<\/a> the new fee could cut the federal deficit by $28.9 billion over the next ten years. During the same period, the CBO expects the Department of the State to issue about 120 million nonimmigrant visas.\u00a0<\/p>\n In 2023 alone, more than 10.4 million nonimmigrants were issued visas, according to DOS data<\/a>. CBO expects a \u201csmall number\u201d of people will seek reimbursement, as many nonimmigrant visas are valid for several years.\u00a0<\/p>\n CBO also expects the Department of State would need several years to implement a process for providing reimbursements. Still, the fee could generate billions, the agency estimates.<\/p>\n The fee is set at $250 during the U.S. fiscal year 2025, which ends Sept. 30, and must be paid when the visa is issued, according to the provision. The secretary of Homeland Security can set the current fee higher, the provision states. During each subsequent fiscal year, the fee will be adjusted for inflation.<\/p>\n Those eligible for reimbursement are visa holders who comply with conditions of the visa, which include not accepting unauthorized employment or not overstaying their visa validity date by more than five days, according to the provision.<\/p>\n Senior Equity Analyst at CFRA Research Ana Garcia told Fortune in an email she expects the \u201cvast majority\u201d of affected travelers to be eligible for reimbursement, as historical U.S. Congressional Research Service data<\/a> indicates that only 1% to 2% of nonimmigrant visitors overstayed their visas between 2016 and 2022.<\/p>\n \u201cThe fee\u2019s design as a refundable security deposit, contingent upon visa compliance, should mitigate concerns among legitimate travelers.\u201d Garcia wrote.<\/p>\n Reimbursements will be made after the travel visa expires, the provision said. Any fees not reimbursed will be deposited into America\u2019s Checkbook, or the General Fund of the Government.<\/p>\n What\u2019s unclear is the effective date of the \u201cvisa integrity fee.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Steven A. Brown, a partner at the Houston-based immigration law firm Reddy Neumann Brown PC, wrote in a post<\/a> on his firm\u2019s website the fee\u2019s \u201cspecific start dates have not yet been confirmed.\u201d<\/p>\n Brown points out that the fee is an add-on to others already required by U.S. travelers.<\/p>\n \u201cFor example, an H-1B worker already paying a $205 application fee may now expect to pay a total of $455 once this fee is in place,\u201d Brown wrote.\u00a0<\/p>\n Most travelers are also required to pay a fee that comes with submitting a Form 1-94 arrival and departure record<\/a>. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act increased this charge from $6 to $24.<\/a><\/p>\n CFRA\u2019s Garcia expects demand to be unmoved by the fee, considering \u201chigher-income\u201d consumers comprise the majority of international leisure and business travelers to the U.S.<\/p>\n \u201cFor affluent travelers, the additional $250 represents a manageable increment relative to overall trip costs,\u201d Garcia wrote. \u201cThe fee structure appears strategically designed to enhance compliance rather than broadly restrict travel.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Visitors to the United States will need to pay a new fee to enter the country, according to…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":275113,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5311],"tags":[13133,74920,51,8179,32,86181,40,476,522,1523,49,978,659],"class_list":{"0":"post-275112","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-united-states","8":"tag-air-travel","9":"tag-airline-industry","10":"tag-business","11":"tag-congress","12":"tag-donald-trump","13":"tag-h-1b-visa","14":"tag-immigration","15":"tag-inflation","16":"tag-international","17":"tag-taxes","18":"tag-united-states","19":"tag-us","20":"tag-usa"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114880756159155948","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275112\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/275113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}