{"id":281607,"date":"2025-07-22T04:49:10","date_gmt":"2025-07-22T04:49:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/281607\/"},"modified":"2025-07-22T04:49:10","modified_gmt":"2025-07-22T04:49:10","slug":"ukraine-is-existential-why-putin-values-war-goals-over-trump-ties-vladimir-putin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/281607\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Ukraine is existential\u2019: why Putin values war goals over Trump ties | Vladimir Putin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Vladimir Putin appears unfazed by Donald Trump\u2019s first tangible break with Moscow \u2013 a sign, analysts and Kremlin insiders say, that the Russian leader had long anticipated a deterioration in relations from the apparent improvement at the beginning of Trump\u2019s second term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">While Moscow views the souring of ties with Trump as regrettable \u2013 the US president dramatically shifted tone last week as he announced a deal to arm <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/ukraine\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ukraine<\/a> and threatened massive sanctions against Russia \u2013 sources say Putin was always going to prioritise the war. He remains confident that Russian forces are gaining ground and that Ukraine\u2019s resistance could soon unravel.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cMoscow is disappointed and upset that it didn\u2019t work out with Trump,\u201d said a former high-ranking Kremlin official. \u201cBut whatever expectations Putin might have had for a good relationship with Trump, it was always going to come second to his maximalist goals in Ukraine. For Putin, the invasion of Ukraine is existential,\u201d the source, speaking on condition of anonymity, added.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Russian president, who for months has gone out of his way to flatter Trump, has not yet commented on his threats, while the Kremlin and top officials have refrained from direct criticism. Behind the scenes, however, there was a mixture of frustration and acceptance.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cIn Moscow, there had been hope and anticipation of forging a strong relationship with Trump,\u201d said Tatiana Stanovaya, an independent Russian political analyst. \u201cBut the baseline expectation in Russia has always been tougher US sanctions and a steady flow of weapons to Ukraine,\u201d Stanovaya added.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">When Trump returned to the White House earlier this year, swiftly reviving efforts to mend ties with Moscow and repeating his campaign vow to resolve the Ukraine conflict in just 24 hours, it briefly seemed like a strategic opening for Putin. A dramatic Oval Office clash with the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, only reinforced the sense that Washington\u2019s posture could be shifting.<\/p>\n<p>Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Donald Trump and JD Vance in the explosive Oval Office meeting that delighted Moscow.   Photograph: ABACA\/REX\/Shutterstock<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">For the Kremlin, Trump\u2019s presidency has long represented a potential geopolitical shake-up: a chance to undermine Nato unity and sow doubt about the west\u2019s long-term commitment to Ukraine.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">But the honeymoon appeared to end last week when Trump publicly aired his frustration over Putin\u2019s refusal to agree to a ceasefire. He followed up with a fresh military aid package for Ukraine \u2013 including helping Kyiv acquire Patriot air defence systems \u2013 and threatened massive sanctions against Russia and its trading partners <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2025\/jul\/14\/trump-does-deal-with-nato-allies-to-arm-ukraine-and-warns-russia-of-severe-sanctions\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">unless a peace deal was reached within 50 days<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Trump seemed particularly aggrieved that his personal outreach to Putin \u2013 including six phone calls \u2013 had yielded nothing, a perceived personal slight for a leader known for his vanity.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cI get home, I\u2019d say: \u2018First lady, I had the most wonderful talk with Vladimir. I think we\u2019re finished,\u2019\u201d Trump said. \u201cAnd then I\u2019d turn on the television, or she\u2019ll say to me one time: \u2018Well that\u2019s strange, because they just bombed a nursing home.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a data-name=\"placeholder\" href=\"https:\/\/interactive.guim.co.uk\/datawrapper\/embed\/Dj59Q\/2\/\" class=\"dcr-1eupayo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Russian drone strikes on Ukraine <\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">A high-level former Kremlin official called the seemingly demonstrative bombardments of Ukrainian cities after the two leaders\u2019 calls a \u201cstrategic mistake\u201d, arguing that Putin had misread Trump\u2019s response.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cPutin didn\u2019t go out of his way to humiliate Trump \u2013 but he certainly didn\u2019t handle it wisely,\u201d the source said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Still, many Russian officials and pro-war bloggers appeared to breathe a sigh of relief last week, dismissing Trump\u2019s threats as milder than anticipated and framing them as effectively granting Putin a 50-day blank cheque.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cA lot can happen in 50 days \u2013 and Putin knows that. He sees Trump as emotional and susceptible to influence,\u201d said another source within Russia\u2019s foreign policy establishment. \u201cMoscow will keep making overtures toward Washington. They don\u2019t see this rift as irreversible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">For now, Moscow is intent on intensifying its offensive in Ukraine. Its relentless use of swarm drone tactics \u2013 launching thousands each night \u2013 is increasingly wearing down Ukrainian defences. The Kremlin has also significantly increased its aerial assaults on Ukrainian urban centres in recent months, with Kyiv coming under frequent attack.<\/p>\n<p>Kyiv\u2019s Lukianivska metro station damaged by a Russian attack. Photograph: Alessio Mamo\/The Guardian<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">On the battlefield, its troops have made slow but consistent advances, pushing closer to the strategically critical eastern city of Pokrovsk.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Those familiar with Putin\u2019s thinking said Trump\u2019s 50-day ultimatum was likely to force him to double down on his war efforts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cThe Russian leadership doesn\u2019t respond to pressure. Most likely, we can say that the first phase of US-Russia relations under Trump, which lasted about six months, has come to an end,\u201d said Fyodor Lukyanov, a prominent Russian foreign policy analyst who heads a council that advises the Kremlin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The former Kremlin official source said Putin was \u201cobsessed\u201d with not looking weak, and it was unlikely that he would soften his stance in the face of Trump\u2019s threats.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">This is bad news for the small and increasingly isolated faction of the Russian elite that had pinned its hopes on a rapprochement with Washington \u2013 and the potential economic boost it might bring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Some had viewed Trump\u2019s evident admiration for their president as a potential turning point \u2013 one that could relieve sanctions, renew western business ties, initiate fresh arms control negotiations and reshape Europe\u2019s power dynamics to Moscow\u2019s advantage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Among ordinary Russians, there seemed to be a real willingness to end the war, with polls showing a sharp rise in support for halting the fighting \u2013 a trend that mirrored growing approval of the US.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The main condition for this opening was that Putin agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine \u2013 one that would effectively freeze the frontlines, letting Russia retain occupied territory and eliminating any realistic prospect of Kyiv reclaiming it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">But Stanovaya, the political analyst, said that while there was \u201csome frustration in certain Moscow circles\u201d over the deteriorating relationship, those who prioritised better ties with Washington over the war in Ukraine held little political sway or influence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">As for those who have followed Putin closely, it came as no surprise that he rejected Trump\u2019s terms for peace, instead reaffirming his<strong> <\/strong>sweeping demands aimed at dismantling Ukraine\u2019s sovereignty.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">His terms for peace include a legally binding promise that Nato will not expand eastwards, Ukrainian neutrality and a cap on the country\u2019s armed forces, protection for Russian speakers who live there, and acceptance of Russia\u2019s territorial gains.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The former Kremlin official said: \u201cOver 100,000 Russians died in this war. Putin simply cannot come home with anything less than what can be seen as a real victory.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">A more militant and confrontational faction in Moscow\u2019s elite now appears to be regaining influence \u2013 one that views a clash with the US not just as likely, but as unavoidable.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Alexander Dugin, the far-right Russian ideologue, wrote on Telegram: \u201cDon\u2019t forget: we see the United States not as a neutral arbiter, but as a party to the war against us in Ukraine. You supply the weapons that allow our enemies to keep fighting. So yes, the US is at war with us.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">\u201cPutin gave Trump time to change that. Time is running out.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Vladimir Putin appears unfazed by Donald Trump\u2019s first tangible break with Moscow \u2013 a sign, analysts and Kremlin&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":281608,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7654],"tags":[2000,299,657],"class_list":{"0":"post-281607","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-ukraine","8":"tag-eu","9":"tag-europe","10":"tag-ukraine"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114895085055634857","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=281607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/281607\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/281608"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=281607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=281607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=281607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}