{"id":282737,"date":"2025-07-22T14:42:11","date_gmt":"2025-07-22T14:42:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/282737\/"},"modified":"2025-07-22T14:42:11","modified_gmt":"2025-07-22T14:42:11","slug":"silicon-valley-trades-researchers-like-football-teams-poach-players","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/282737\/","title":{"rendered":"Silicon Valley trades researchers like football teams poach players |"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The tech industry is in a high-flying war over who can dole out more millions to attract artificial intelligence specialists. Individual researchers, most equipped with PhDs in computer science, are commanding giant salaries and mammoth signing bonuses in hiring negotiations. You might call them talent. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/technology\/2025\/07\/16\/ai-meta-superstars-silicon-valley\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Washington Post<\/a> called them Olympians in a recent headline: \u201cWhy AI superathletes could be winning $100 million bonuses in Silicon Valley.\u201d These are the most sought-after employees in the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Tech companies are tasking the star players of their AI squads with developing technology that can outperform humans in any task, a goal known as \u201cartificial general intelligence\u201d, or with creating AI models that surpass human intelligence overall, an objective known as \u201csuperintelligence\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">In pursuit of these grails, Silicon Valley is throwing around amounts of money that could found dynasties. The scramble is so desperate and remunerative that the poaching of individual researchers makes news, though they may have been unknown before now. A headline in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wired.com\/story\/jason-wei-open-ai-meta\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wired<\/a>: \u201cAnother High-Profile OpenAI Researcher Departs for Meta\u201d. In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2025-07-17\/meta-hires-two-key-apple-ai-experts-after-poaching-their-boss\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Bloomberg<\/a>: \u201cMeta Hires Two Key Apple AI experts After Poaching Their Boss.\u201d In <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theinformation.com\/briefings\/anthropic-hires-back-two-coding-ai-leaders-cursor-developer-anysphere?utm_campaign=%5BREBRAND%5D+%5BTI-AM%5D+Th&amp;utm_content=1095&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=cio&amp;utm_term=124\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Information<\/a>: \u201cAnthropic Hires Back Two Coding AI Leaders From Cursor Developer Anysphere\u201d. All of these stories were published in the past week.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The tech press\u2019 furor over these researchers reminds me of sports media covering the trades of star players. The dissection of their pay, the speculation about who\u2019s next on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/tech\/meta-ai-recruiting-mark-zuckerberg-openai-018ed7fc\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Meta\u2019s list<\/a>, the playing of one company off another, the discussion of each company\u2019s team composition or overall strategy and the attention to this individual player or that one are all redolent of the scrutinized trade of US basketball phenomenon <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/sport\/2025\/feb\/02\/luka-doncic-anthony-davis-mavericks-lakers-trade\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Luka Don\u010di\u0107<\/a> from the Dallas Mavericks to the Los Angeles Lakers, for example.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The word \u201cAnother\u201d in Wired\u2019s headline is a cue that one company is fueling this frenzy: Meta. Mark Zuckerberg has made eye-popping claims about his firm\u2019s spending over the past week. He said that his company will spend \u201chundreds of billions\u201d of dollars on its artificial intelligence efforts. In April, Meta revised its planned capital expenditure for this year alone upward to a range of $64bn to $75bn. The company\u2019s previous range was $60bn to $65bn. In 2023, Meta\u2019s capex was a measly $28bn, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/article\/meta-q1-earnings-revenue-profit-beat-ai-capex-raise\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fortune<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Zuckerberg is backing his pledges with cash. In early July, Meta hired away the leader of Apple\u2019s AI models team, Ruoming Pang, with a jumbo-sized pay package worth some $200m. The researcher joins Meta\u2019s Superintelligence team, perhaps the most expensive team of engineers since the Manhattan Project.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Putting this trading frenzy in perspective is one Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, who made the point early last week that half of the top AI researchers in the world <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/07\/16\/business\/nvidia-jensen-huang-beijing.html#:~:text=Mr.%20Huang%20used%20his%20remarks,big%20markets%2C%E2%80%9D%20he%20said.\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">reside in China<\/a>. Huang made the remark in Beijing, where he was attending a conference and celebrating Donald Trump\u2019s new allowance for Huang\u2019s extremely profitable company to sell its most advanced semiconductors in China, where there is strong demand for them. Previously, Nvidia\u2019s chips had been subject to strict export restrictions. Huang\u2019s nod to China\u2019s stock of AI researchers highlights the fact that American firms are pouring money into a pool of English-speaking talent that may yet be outclassed by its competition across the Pacific, no matter how much the tech giants pay.<\/p>\n<p>A spate of iPhone and Samsung alternatives make a play for your pocket Photograph: Samuel Gibbs\/The Guardian<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Several companies have created phones in recent years attempting to provide alternatives to the industry\u2019s biggest players, in some cases capitalizing on growing anxieties over how smartphones are dominating our lives or simply attempting to rebel against the monopolistic hold Apple and Samsung have over the market.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">One option is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jul\/16\/internet-safe-sage-iphone-for-children-goes-on-sale-in-uk-for-99-pounds-a-month\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a device newly released in the UK by Sage Mobile<\/a>, which is an iPhone 16 loaded with custom software that prohibits internet searches, gaming downloads and social media apps like Instagram. As UK technology editor Robert Booth writes, the bespoke handset costs more than double a standard UK iPhone contract and is marketed at children with the selling point of helping them \u201creconnect with real life\u201d:<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The devices will include an app store that is curated by Sage Mobile and will only allow users access to apps for tasks like banking, public transport, schooling, calendars and weather.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Experience with a similar device sold in the US showed children used it for between 15 minutes and an hour a day, instead of average screen time in the UK of almost three hours a day among eight to 14-year-olds. Kaspar said children lose interest in it because \u201cit\u2019s not as magical, it\u2019s not as fun\u201d, resulting in many reclaimed \u201clife hours\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">An anonymous 16-year-old reviewer <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jul\/16\/sage-iphone-for-children-review-teenagers-internet-safe-smartphone\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">gave the phone a test run<\/a> for the Guardian, finding that using Sage highlighted just how dependent their social life was on the myriad of apps and platforms they had grown up on. Although they felt more productive and spent more time talking with their family, creating a clean severance between online and offline life was more complicated than simply blocking your apps:<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The people at Sage said it could take a month to get used to the limitations, but I don\u2019t have that long to test it. I can already tell you that if you are a teenager you are going to feel disconnected from all of your friends and the rest of the world and that feels unfair. Having TikTok and Instagram is the way the world is wired now. If you take them away then it\u2019s quite hard to stay in the loop.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">If I stayed with this phone I would also end up feeling left out when speaking in real life to my friends as this is where so many of our sayings and jokes come from.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The London-based company Nothing takes a different tack with its device, the minimally named Phone 3. Rather than a restricted or pared-down version of an iPhone or Android it is an attempt to create a design-forward, quirky phone with touches like a tiny LED screen on the back of its transparent semi-transparent case.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Built off Nothing\u2019s version of an Android operating system, the phone carries much of the functionality but with unique elements that try to differentiate it from Apple and Samsung\u2019s ubiquitous devices. As consumer technology editor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jul\/16\/nothing-phone-3-review-a-quirky-slick-android-alternative\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Samuel Gibbs writes in his four out of five stars review<\/a>, you\u2019ll need to really prize that differentiation to make it worthwhile:<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">The Phone 3 is a good but not great Android from Nothing. It is more interesting than rivals, but you have to actively want something different for it to make sense as you can easily get better-performing and longer-lasting handsets at about this price.<\/p>\n<p> Photograph: AP<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">In his pledge to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on AI, Zuckerberg said his company was at work constructing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jul\/16\/zuckerberg-meta-data-center-ai-manhattan\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a data center nearly as big as Manhattan<\/a>. The enormous complex, brought to life by Meta\u2019s equally humongous capital expenditure, will be named after Hyperion, a Greek titan who personified the sun. Zuckerberg christened a second, smaller data center Prometheus after the titan who brought humans fire and was punished eternally for stealing sacred knowledge from the gods on Mount Olympus. Is the data center the titan bringing us the fire? Or are we, the human beings who have created AI, the titan? If so, what will our punishment be? Whatever the feelings the name inspires in you, Zuckerberg has made yet another declaration of titanic ambition. The novel Frankenstein has a second, less famous title that seems relevant: The Modern Prometheus.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-16w5gq9\">Google is also expanding its earthly ambitions, with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jul\/16\/google-hydropower-deal-clean-energy\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a $3bn hydropower deal<\/a> and a plan to invest $25bn in data centers across Pennsylvania and neighboring states over the next two years. Apple, too, is leaving its mark with <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/jul\/16\/apple-us-mining-deal-magnets\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a $500m deal for rare earths minerals<\/a> that it struck with a US mining company.<\/p>\n<p>The wider TechScape<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The tech industry is in a high-flying war over who can dole out more millions to attract artificial&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":282738,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3163],"tags":[323,1942,53,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-282737","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-artificial-intelligence","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-artificial-intelligence","10":"tag-technology","11":"tag-uk","12":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114897416807901433","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282737\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}