{"id":282931,"date":"2025-07-22T16:18:12","date_gmt":"2025-07-22T16:18:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/282931\/"},"modified":"2025-07-22T16:18:12","modified_gmt":"2025-07-22T16:18:12","slug":"personal-representatives-to-be-liable-for-iht-payments-on-pensions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/282931\/","title":{"rendered":"Personal representatives to be liable for IHT payments on pensions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Personal representatives will be liable for reporting and paying any <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ftadviser.com\/inheritance-tax\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IHT<\/a> on unused pension funds from April 2027.<\/p>\n<p>Published yesterday (July 21), the government put out its draft legislation to apply IHT on unused pensions funds and death benefits. <\/p>\n<p>Although the proposals remain largely unchanged from when Rachel Reeves announced them in the Autumn Budget, the government has made a few revisions to what it had previously announced. <\/p>\n<p>Between October 2024 and January 2025, the government consulted on the process for reporting and paying IHT on unused pension funds and death benefits. <\/p>\n<p>It proposed that pension scheme administrators would be liable for reporting and paying any IHT on the pension element of an individual\u2019s estate. <\/p>\n<p>            Recommended<br \/>\n            <a class=\"recommended-article-link\" data-trackable=\"recommended-article\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ftadviser.com\/inheritance-tax\/2025\/7\/14\/iht-on-pensions-does-not-work-at-all\/\" data-articleid=\"beec7182-fe55-4fcd-ac6c-598a32450e2b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>                        <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/a07496ce-3db7-40ba-a5a3-09f9d8fe8f72.jpg\" width=\"290px\" height=\"290px\" alt=\"Recommended article's image\" loading=\"lazy\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\u2018IHT on pensions does not work at all\u2019<\/p>\n<p>            <\/a><\/p>\n<p>Following the consultation, the government has announced personal representatives rather than pension scheme administrators, will be liable for reporting and paying any IHT due on unused pension funds and death benefits from April 6, 2027. <\/p>\n<p>It also confirmed death in service benefits payable from a registered pension scheme will remain out of scope of IHT. <\/p>\n<p>Government has \u2018blown its opportunity\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Roddy Munro, pension specialist at Quilter, was thankful government had listened to some responses but was concerned without further amendments, how the policy was actually enacted risked \u201cturning a targeted tax reform into an administrative minefield.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat we could end up seeing is a massive transfer of private wealth back to the state. What\u2019s more, while only a small fraction of estates will pay more tax, a far greater number will face needless complexity, delays, and stress \u2014 often at the worst possible time,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/static.ftadviser.com\/public\/images\/icons\/pull-quote-orange.svg\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"sc-fKMpNL idPUHS\"\/>HMRC has blown its opportunity to bin the original proposals, stubbornly sticking with a system that will create confusion, complexity and additional costs for bereaved families. <\/p>\n<p class=\"author\">Rachel Vahey, AJ Bell <\/p>\n<p>Andrew Tully, technical services director at Nucleus Financial was disappointed to see the government had not listened to \u201cvery strong views\u201d that using IHT was not the best option to boost Treasury coffers. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIncluding pensions within the IHT environment will deliver poor outcomes for customers, beneficiaries, personal representatives, the industry, and HMRC. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis complex process will cause bereaved families confusion and stress at a difficult time and doesn\u2019t fit well with the support firms may want to provide people who are likely to be vulnerable following the death of a loved one.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A report released this month by The Investing and Saving Alliance, found <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ftadviser.com\/inheritance-tax\/2025\/7\/14\/alternative-policies-can-raise-similar-revenue-as-iht-on-pensions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">alternative policies<\/a> could raise the same level of tax revenues as bringing IHT into the scope of pensions.<\/p>\n<p>Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell said: \u201cHMRC has blown its opportunity to bin the original proposals, stubbornly sticking with a system that will create confusion, complexity and additional costs for bereaved families. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cOptions were put forward by the industry which would have been far more straightforward than bringing unspent pensions into IHT, while still raising the same amount of tax.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAlthough most savers will be unaffected and should not need to change their financial plans, some now face difficult choices about how best to arrange their finances. Many have saved and invested in good faith and now face the possibility of punitive rates of taxation when passing pension money to their loved ones.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBereaved families also face a huge administrative burden, with the government insisting they settle the IHT bill within six months. Many people have complex financial affairs, especially those who die unexpectedly, meaning settling the bill quickly may not be straightforward.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> alina.khan@ft.com<\/p>\n<p>Have your say in the comments section below or email us: ftadviser.newsdesk@ft.com<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Personal representatives will be liable for reporting and paying any IHT on unused pension funds from April 2027.&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":282932,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3093],"tags":[51,474,8370,617,2499,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-282931","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-finance","10":"tag-ft-adviser","11":"tag-pensions","12":"tag-personal-finance","13":"tag-uk","14":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114897794114157246","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282931\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/282932"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}