Manchester United have chosen not to sign Alexander Isak and that is their call, but one player has dropped a \u2018bombshell\u2019 with their decision to \u2018QUIT\u2019.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
United front Mediawatch has ruled out a move for Jessica Alba \u2013 despite her recent divorce.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Isak, back and crack It is a monumental boost for Liverpool, who must have been concerned. And it is the dictionary definition of a great scoop in the journalism world. Keep those sources close to your chest, fella.<\/p>\n The preposterous idea this is in any way Manchester United\u2019s call, propagated by a headline which starts with \u2018Man Utd make Alexander Isak decision\u2019 is entirely undermined by the end of the third paragraph:<\/p>\n \u2018\u2026but Newcastle\u2019s \u00a3150million valuation has priced them out a move for him.\u2019<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n You don\u2019t sodding say? And even if money was no object at Redundancies and Cost-Cutting FC, persuading possibly the best striker in world football to turn down multiple suitors for the 15th-best team in England seems like a challenge they could do without.<\/p>\n But sure, Manchester United have made a \u2018decision\u2019 on Isak. Why stop there? It turns out they have made calls on Kylian Mbappe, Erling Haaland and Lamine Yamal too. And pretty much every other professional footballer not overperforming in the Premier League\u2019s mid-table to bottom half while turning 26 this summer.<\/p>\n MORE ALEXANDER ISAK COVERAGE ON F365<\/strong> \u00a0<\/p>\n Alexander the great \u2018Chelsea and\u00a0Manchester United\u00a0have ruled out a move for unsettled Newcastle striker Alexander Isak, who has been left out of their pre-season tour of the Far East after saying he wants to explore a move away.\u2019<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n You can maybe just about have Chelsea, who have engaged in enough transfer ridiculousness in recent years for it to be necessary to specifically rule them out of every transfer race, even one they have barely been mentioned in until now.<\/p>\n But in no world does it need to be revealed that Manchester United won\u2019t be in the running, nor should anyone pretend it is their choice not to get involved.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Unlikely lads \u2018Manchester United are unlikely to move for striker Alexander Isak despite his apparent desire to leave Newcastle.\u2019<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The big question: Is not quite ruling out a signing which has less than zero chance of happening just \u2018another step in the right direction for the club\u2019<\/strong><\/a>?<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Grant my last request and just let me hold you \u2018Liverpool get Alexander Isak boost as striker hands in Newcastle transfer request\u2019<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n \u2026is nonsense. Handing in a transfer request is slightly more official and formal than just letting it be known you want to explore your options. There\u2019s paperwork and everything.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>\u2018Manchester United have ruled out a move for\u00a0Alexander Isak \u2013 despite the striker\u2019s desire to leave\u00a0Newcastle\u2019 \u2013 David McDonnell, Daily Mirror<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
<\/strong>That really is an exceptional \u2018exclusive\u2019: that Manchester United<\/strong><\/a> \u2013 who famously have to sell to buy having haggled for about six weeks over a second \u00a360m-plus signing of the summer \u2013 won\u2019t actually be entering a race against Champions League clubs and title contenders to shatter their transfer record on a \u00a3150m centre-forward with the lure of precisely no European football.<\/p>\n\n
\ud83d\udc49\u00a0Alexander Isak to Liverpool is unstoppable force; Newcastle are no immovable object<\/strong><\/a>
\ud83d\udc49\u00a0\u2018Unusual\u2019 Alexander Isak Liverpool update surfaces amid \u2018final call\u2019 revelation as PIF make \u2018intervention\u2019<\/strong><\/a>
\ud83d\udc49\u00a0Alexander Isak \u2018furious\u2019 with Paul Mitchell as Newcastle star slams Saudi owners over lack of \u2018ambition\u2019<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n
<\/strong>This absurd line extends to the Daily Mail<\/strong>, whose writers Kieran Gill and Chris Wheeler report entirely earnestly:<\/p>\n\n
<\/strong>And of bloody course Samuel Luckhurst of the Manchester Evening News<\/strong> has to wade in without fully committing to the bit:<\/p>\n\n
<\/strong>It shouldn\u2019t really need pointing out twice in a week but this sort of headline from the London Evening Standard<\/strong>\u2026<\/p>\n\n