{"id":291846,"date":"2025-07-25T23:47:14","date_gmt":"2025-07-25T23:47:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/291846\/"},"modified":"2025-07-25T23:47:14","modified_gmt":"2025-07-25T23:47:14","slug":"championship-net-spend-table-since-2020-wrexham-above-birmingham","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/291846\/","title":{"rendered":"Championship net spend table since 2020: Wrexham above Birmingham&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Since the 2020-21 season, 11 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.planetfootball.com\/tag\/championship\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Championship<\/a> clubs have a positive net spend, while the other 13 have spent more on transfer fees than they\u2019ve received.<\/p>\n<p>While the lure of Premier League football is becoming increasingly lucrative, Championship clubs are spending more money than ever before in order to compete.<\/p>\n<p>Clubs that have made it to the Premier League in recent years do have a significant financial advantage over those who haven\u2019t, given they are in receipt of parachute payments.<\/p>\n<p>The clubs that are relegated from the Premier League are given roughly\u00a0\u00a330million each season for three years.<\/p>\n<p>Given the level of money that clubs need to spend in order to make themselves competitive when they do reach the Premier League, it won\u2019t come as much of a surprise that newly relegated Ipswich, Southampton and Leicester all rank highly on the net-spend table.<\/p>\n<p>Since 2020-21, Ipswich have a net spend of\u00a0-\u20ac134.16million, with the bulk of that figure coming from last season in the Premier League.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, Southampton and Sheffield United have also made significant outlays in the transfer market in recent years, with both clubs having a net spend of above\u00a0\u20ac35million.<\/p>\n<p>Of the clubs in the top six of the net spend table, Coventry are the only side who haven\u2019t received parachute payments in the last five years.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, they\u2019ve been able to generate funds via player sales, with the likes of\u00a0Viktor Gyokeres and\u00a0Gustavo Hamer being sold for significant fees.<\/p>\n<p>However, despite those sales, Coventry still have a net spend of over\u00a0\u20ac24million across the last five years. Since 2023-24, Coventry have spent around \u20ac60million on new players.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, Wrexham have a slightly higher net spend than Birmingham since 2020, despite the Welsh club paying significantly less on transfer fees during the last five years.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s because Birmingham\u2019s large spend has been offset by player sales like Jude Bellingham and\u00a0Jordan James, whereas Wrexham haven\u2019t had any major sales in recent years.<\/p>\n<p>On the opposite end of the spectrum, Watford have made significantly more from player sales than they\u2019ve spent in recent years.<\/p>\n<p>In total, they made a net profit of over\u00a0\u20ac160million in the transfer market since the 2021-22 campaign.<\/p>\n<p>Since being relegated form the Premier League, the club has sold the likes of\u00a0Yaser Asprilla,\u00a0Ismael Kone,\u00a0Joao Pedro,\u00a0Ismaila Sarr,\u00a0Hassane Kamara and\u00a0Emmanuel Dennis all for significant sums of money.<\/p>\n<p>Blackburn Rovers rank 23rd on the net spend table, having not spent much themselves and having sold the likes of\u00a0Adam Wharton and\u00a0Sammie Szmodics for significant profits.<\/p>\n<p>Other clubs such as Middlesbrough, Swansea, Bristol City and Norwich have also generated significant funds via player sales and rank quite low on the net-spend table.<\/p>\n<p>Using figures provided by Transfermarkt, here is the full breakdown of each Championship club\u2019s net spend since the 2020-21 campaign.<\/p>\n<p>1.\u00a0Ipswich Town: -\u20ac134.16million<br \/>2. Southampton: -\u20ac59.46million<br \/>3.\u00a0Sheffield United: -\u20ac36.64million<br \/>4. West Brom: -\u20ac28.05million<br \/>5. Coventry: -\u20ac24.68million<br \/>6. Leicester City: -\u20ac20.13million<br \/>7. Preston North End: -\u20ac12.09million<br \/>8. Wrexham: -\u20ac10.66million<br \/>9. Birmingham: -\u20ac8.17million<br \/>10. Charlton: -\u20ac5.58million<br \/>11. Millwall: -\u20ac4.27million<br \/>12. Portsmouth: -\u20ac4.27million<br \/>13. Sheffield Wednesday: -\u20ac3.89million<br \/>14. Oxford United: +\u20ac1.79million<br \/>15. Derby County: +\u20ac5.28million<br \/>16. QPR: +\u20ac9.07million<br \/>17. Stoke City: +\u20ac9.49million<br \/>18. Hull City: +\u20ac9.82million<br \/>19. Middlesbrough: +\u20ac20.41million<br \/>20. Swansea: +\u20ac23.60million<br \/>21. Bristol City: +\u20ac23.71million<br \/>22. Norwich City: +\u20ac35.31million<br \/>23. Blackburn Rovers: +\u20ac41.32million<br \/>24. Watford: +\u20ac169.31million<\/p>\n<p><strong>READ NEXT:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.planetfootball.com\/lists-and-rankings\/championship-biggest-transfer-window-spend-history\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The 5 biggest transfer window spends in Championship history: Aston Villa, Newcastle\u2026<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>TRY A QUIZ:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.planetfootball.com\/quizzes\/can-name-every-club-play-championship-since-2000-01\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Can you name every club to play in the Championship since 2000-01?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Since the 2020-21 season, 11 Championship clubs have a positive net spend, while the other 13 have spent&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":291847,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7820],"tags":[855,748,393,4884,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-291846","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-birmingham","8":"tag-birmingham","9":"tag-britain","10":"tag-england","11":"tag-great-britain","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114916546790244813","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=291846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/291846\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/291847"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=291846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=291846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=291846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}