Charles and Diana married in an enormous spectacle, estimated to have cost a staggering \u00a357 million<\/p>\n
Bettmann<\/p>\n
The event cost a staggering 57 million British pounds (about $66 million) and was watched by a record-breaking number of people across 74 countries. Around 600,000 well-wishers gathered to see the newlyweds process through the streets, as the day had been declared a national holiday. For her wedding, which took place just five months after the couple had announced their engagement, Diana wore a silk-taffeta fairytale gown that was estimated to cost \u00a390,000 (about $120,000). With its \u201980s era-defining puff sleeves and enormous 25-foot train, it is still remembered as one of the most iconic wedding dresses of all time. In fact, the train, which remains the the longest in the history of royal wedding dresses, was so massive that the Emanuels had to relocate from their studio to an abandoned wing in Buckingham Palace, where they had the space to cut the train to size and shape.<\/p>\n
Diana biographer (and previous Tatler and Vanity Fair editor) Tina Brown<\/strong> described the dress<\/a> as \u201cthe fulfillment of her Princess fantasy. She was insistent in her demand for its puffy sleeves and floating silk, its 25-foot taffeta train, its nipped waist, and its antique lace embroidered with pearls and sequins.\u201d Diana teamed her dress with satin and lace slippers\u2014low-heeled so that she didn’t tower over her new husband \u2013 made by celebrity shoemaker Clive Shilton.<\/strong> Intricately decorated with 500 sequins and 100 seed pearls, the suede soles were painted with a small \u201cC\u201d and \u201cD\u201d under the heel, a heart added between the initials.<\/p>\n Princess Diana\u2019s 25-foot train remains the longest of any royal bride in history<\/p>\n Anwar Hussein\/Getty Images<\/p>\n As is tradition, Princess Diana wore a tiara on her wedding day, but she did not borrow one from the royal family. Instead, she wore the Spencer tiara<\/a>, which had been in her family for nearly a century. Made up of different pieces of jewelry, it was transformed by Garrard in the 1930s into a tiara, which was also worn by Diana\u2019s elder sisters<\/a>, Lady Sarah Spencer (now Sarah McCorquodale<\/strong>) and Lady Jane Spencer (now Jane Fellowes<\/strong>) on their own wedding days.<\/p>\n Despite all her efforts to ensure a happy marriage with the many sweet touches included in her wedding outfit, Charles and Diana\u2019s union was not to last, and the couple divorced in 1996<\/a>. Nevertheless, Diana\u2019s wedding dress remains preserved in time as one of the best-known examples of royal style, and arguably represents the beginning of the Princess’ relationship with fashion\u2014an interest that would endure for the rest of her life.<\/p>\n