{"id":306114,"date":"2025-07-31T08:21:15","date_gmt":"2025-07-31T08:21:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/306114\/"},"modified":"2025-07-31T08:21:15","modified_gmt":"2025-07-31T08:21:15","slug":"more-apologies-being-made-over-sheffield-street-tree-scandal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/306114\/","title":{"rendered":"More apologies being made over Sheffield street tree scandal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n  An independent report by law firm VWV investigated formal complaints made by four residents who\u00a0faced injunction proceedings for their part in protests to stop the felling of thousands of street trees. Another nine protesters gave undertakings to the council as a result of being targeted for legal action.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The report said that all the protests and campaigning activity were legal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  <strong>WANT MORE ON THIS STORY?\u00a0<\/strong>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n        A meeting of the council\u2019s finance and performance policy committee earlier this month\u00a0heard from chief operating officer Claire Taylor that all the recommendations and actions proposed by the VWV report have been fully accepted.\n      <\/p>\n<p>\n  Committee chair Coun Zahira Naz said: \u201cBefore we begin discussing the report formally, I want to acknowledge the seriousness of what we are about to consider.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201cThis investigation lays bare a difficult and painful chapter in the council\u2019s recent history. It confirms what many residents have long felt during the street trees dispute, that mistakes were made that had a lasting impact on individuals and trust in this council.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201cThe way legal action was taken and how complaints were handled did not meet the standards that the public rightly expect from public bodies. As chair of the finance committee, I recognise that this is not just about historic decisions, it\u2019s also about how we manage risk, ensure oversight and build the culture of transparency and accountability moving forward.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201cThe reputational, financial and human cost of poor decision-making is clear. This report makes it clear that simply an apology is not enough \u2013 the apology must be sincere,\u00a0personal and followed by meaningful change.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  Coun Naz thanked the complainants who pursued the issue \u201cwith courage and persistence\u201d and thanked VWV for their \u201cclear and frank\u201d findings.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  She added: \u201cIt is now on us as councillors, officers and leaders to demonstrate that we listened, understood and are committed to doing better.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  Coun Naz welcomed the report\u2019s findings and said that a serious discussion must take place to strengthen the council and rebuild public confidence.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The issue will also be discussed by the strategy and resources committee in September. It will hear an update on the apology-making process.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The report said that the council decided in 2017 to threaten protesters they considered \u201cthe main protagonists\u201d with high court action unless they gave wide-ranging undertakings that they would not take part in direct action to stop the tree-felling programme.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The four complained in 2021 when questions to the council revealed further information.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The report said that the council made little response, other than to decide the complaints would be dealt with by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.forestryjournal.co.uk\/news\/23372307.sheffield-protesters-vindicated-damning-report-tree-felling\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sir Mark Lowcock\u2019s inquiry into the street tree scandal.<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  However, the inquiry team said that it lay outside the scope of what they were investigating.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The VWV report concluded the council must\u00a0\u00a0\u201cissue full and complete apologies to each of the complainants from the chief executive of the council. This will need to incorporate the apologies post Lowcock Inquiry, that had not been accepted by the complainants and in accordance with the perimeters set within the strategy and resources committee in respect of apologies.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201cIn addition these apologies must also cover the issues identified in this report around decision making, heavy handedness and failure to deal with the complaints in an appropriate way.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  \u201cThese apologies must reflect the individual complainants and their part in the many years of this dispute where they have persisted for the \u2018right\u2019 thing to be done, despite the obstacles placed in their way by the council.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  It said the council must also \u201cconsider how to demonstrate, in an open and transparent way, acceptance, compliance and accountability of these recommendations\u201d.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n  The report concluded that legal staff must be \u201cthe voice of constructive challenge and role models of good governance \u2013 specifically in the context of this investigation to raise and escalate poor\/ill-conceived instructions requiring the taking of legal action\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"An independent report by law firm VWV investigated formal complaints made by four residents who\u00a0faced injunction proceedings for&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":306115,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8817],"tags":[748,393,4884,1620,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-306114","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sheffield","8":"tag-britain","9":"tag-england","10":"tag-great-britain","11":"tag-sheffield","12":"tag-uk","13":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114946879730712226","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=306114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/306114\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/306115"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=306114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=306114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=306114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}