Heathrow has submitted its \u201cshovel-ready\u201d plans for a third runway as part of a \u00a350bn investment, as the government said expanding Europe\u2019s largest airport could create 100,000 jobs and drive growth.<\/p>\n
The 2-mile (3.2km) runway expansion would cross a diverted M25 and allow more than 750 additional flights a day over London<\/a>, helping bring the total annual number of passengers to 150 million.<\/p>\n Environmental campaigners called it a \u201cdoomed scheme\u201d that would release millions of tonnes of CO2 while benefiting only a small minority of rich flyers.<\/p>\n Heathrow airport proposed expansion<\/a><\/p>\n Heathrow said that with government support it could obtain planning permission by 2029 and have the runway in operation by 2035.<\/p>\n Its proposals remain essentially the same as those submitted in 2019<\/a> and approved in principle by the government and MPs. That scheme survived a brief block on climate grounds<\/a> sparked by legal challenges from campaigners, overturned on appeal in 2020<\/a>.<\/p>\n However, the plans were put on hold as passenger numbers dropped during the pandemic. The shareholders in the airport, which include the French private equity firm Ardian and Saudi Arabia and Qatar\u2019s sovereign wealth funds, are seeking legislative change, as well as long-term political support, before filing a full planning application.<\/p>\n Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, has strongly endorsed expansion<\/a>, but Heathrow is seeking firm policy guarantees after previous runway plans were overturned.<\/p>\n These include airspace modernisation to ensure extra flight paths and the passing of the planning and infrastructure bill<\/a>. The airport is also seeking guarantees that the aviation regulator, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), would allow Heathrow to levy charges to airlines at a level high enough to recoup its investment.<\/p>\n Heathrow said the price of the runway itself would now be \u00a321bn, up from \u00a314bn six years ago, due to inflation in construction costs. An additional extension of Terminal 5 to support the extra passengers would cost \u00a312bn, while another \u00a315bn spend is planned to upgrade the wider airport regardless of the runway development.<\/p>\n The chief executive of the airport, Thomas Woldbye, said it had \u201cnever been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow\u201d.<\/p>\n He said: \u201cWe are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity. With a green light from government and the correct policy support underpinned by a fit-for-purpose regulatory model, we are ready to mobilise and start investing this year in our supply chain across the country. We are uniquely placed to do this for the country. It is time to clear the way for takeoff.\u201d<\/p>\n A government spokesperson said: \u201cExpanding Heathrow could drive growth, trade and tourism, whilst unlocking over 100,000 jobs.\u201d<\/p>\n British Airways operates half of all flights from Heathrow, and the airport claims expansion would create more competition. Photograph: Chris J Ratcliffe\/Reuters<\/p>\n The government has promised to review the plans over the summer, with Heathrow pressing for a green light in September. It will also examine a rival proposal from a developer, the Arora Group, which has drawn up plans for a shorter runway further to the east.<\/p>\n skip past newsletter promotion<\/a><\/p>\n Sign up to Business Today<\/p>\n Get set for the working day \u2013 we’ll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning<\/p>\n Privacy Notice: <\/strong>Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy<\/a>. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Service<\/a> apply.<\/p>\n after newsletter promotion<\/p>\n A Heathrow spokesperson said the airport was open to discussing with airlines the potential for a shorter runway, but it did not believe alternative schemes could reduce the cost or deliver the same benefits as the existing plans.<\/p>\n The hub\u2019s expansion is backed by business groups and unions, as well as the government, despite arguments that unchecked aviation growth is incompatible with Britain\u2019s net zero ambitions and tackling the climate emergency.<\/p>\n The CBI, British Chambers of Commerce, MakeUK and the Federation of Small Businesses said in a joint statement that the third runway \u201copens up vital access to major and emerging markets [and] unlocks billions in private investment, strengthening supply chains, creating jobs, and driving skills across the country\u201d.<\/p>\n Heathrow claims expansion would also create more competition. British Airways currently operates half of all flights from Heathrow and airlines jealously guard rights to valuable slots. EasyJet said the runway represented \u201ca unique opportunity for easyJet to operate from the airport at scale for the first time and bring with it lower fares for consumers\u201d.<\/p>\n However, opponents questioned whether the scheme would progress, having failed to move ahead so far despite approval from two previous governments.<\/p>\n Paul McGuinness, the chair of the No 3rd Runway coalition, said: \u201cThere\u2019s a real danger that we\u2019ll end up with a hole in the ground and a debt pile for taxpayers to underwrite, because the government had foolishly encouraged Heathrow\u2019s profligate self-interest, as if blind to the lessons of HS2.\u201d<\/p>\n The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said a new runway would have \u201ca hugely detrimental impact on our environment\u201d.<\/p>\n Dr Douglas Parr, the policy director for Greenpeace UK, said the announcements meant residents around Heathrow would have \u201ctheir lives put on hold for a few more years while more money and time is wasted on a doomed scheme \u2026 the economic case for the whole debacle just will not fly\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Heathrow has submitted its \u201cshovel-ready\u201d plans for a third runway as part of a \u00a350bn investment, as the…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":307941,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[13,12,14],"class_list":{"0":"post-307940","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-top-stories"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114950787900927772","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=307940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/307940\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/307941"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=307940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=307940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=307940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}