![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Galaxy-Watch-Ultra-Facer-app-scaled.jpg\"\/ "\\"Galaxy")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Kaitlyn Cimino \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n
After going quiet for a while due to compatibility issues with Wear OS 5, Facer\u2019s finally back with full Wear OS 6 support, and it\u2019s a notable upgrade. The app supports Google\u2019s Watch Face Format (WFF), which means faces sync directly from the phone app to your watch, without extra installs or app juggling required. All-in-all, the revamped app experience brings some welcome usability improvements.<\/p>\n
Do you use Facer, Pujie, KWCH, WatchMaker, or other custom watch face apps?<\/p>\n
2898 votes<\/p>\n
Yes, all the time.<\/p>\n
40%<\/p>\n
Sometimes, if I find a face that works for me.<\/p>\n
25%<\/p>\n
No, I don’t like the faces on them.<\/p>\n
16%<\/p>\n
No, I’d never heard of them before.<\/p>\n
19%<\/p>\n
I tested the new Facer update on a Galaxy Watch Ultra, and right from setup, it\u2019s clear things have been smoothed out. Syncing faces is practically instant. Once I tapped on my pick, it immediately showed up on my watch. The friction-free process goes a long way toward making the app feel like a proper part of the platform instead of a third-party workaround. It also makes it dangerously tempting to save entirely more faces than necessary.<\/p>\n
The upgraded Facer app introduces a friction-free process of instant syncing between your watch and the app.<\/p>\n
Of course, Facer\u2019s massive face library is still the main draw. Whether you\u2019re into minimalist analog layouts or over-the-top animated options, there\u2019s something for everyone, and of course, plenty you won\u2019t like at all. I tend to gravitate away from the branded faces personally, but I was also the only child I knew who found SpongeBob incredibly irksome. If you\u2019re after a name-brand look, there are new licensed options for everything from Star Trek to Barbie, and the library at large is robust and rapidly growing.<\/p>\n
The big technical upgrade behind Facer\u2019s Wear OS 6 update is support for Google\u2019s Watch Face Format (WFF). WFF is the standard that lets watch faces run smoother, look sharper, and sync directly from your phone without extra hassle. It means more dynamic animations, cleaner complication data, and better power management options. With that said, WFF does come with some trade-offs. Designers have to work within Google\u2019s rules, which can limit customization compared to older formats. While it\u2019s a step toward a more consistent, reliable experience, it does mean less creative freedom, and some developers are discouraged by the parameters.<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Galaxy-Watch-Ultra-Facer-app-Sync-scaled.jpg\"\/ "\\"Galaxy")
<\/p>\n
Kaitlyn Cimino \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n
As a user, I\u2019ve found plenty of designs I love, even if the library hasn\u2019t yet caught up with the previous breadth of offerings. WFF faces feel smoother, more responsive, and less taxing on the watch overall. Battery life is always a big concern with custom faces, and Facer addresses that with its new Power Impact label. This manifests as a simple lightning bolt gauge that shows up green on more efficient designs. I appreciate having that info up front, as power is always my top priority when setting up my smartwatch. To that end, I mostly stick to static or simpler faces during longer days, very occasionally swapping in animated ones when I\u2019m going to be around the house (and my charging dock) and don\u2019t care as much about longevity. Facer even highlights a section of faces with optimized ambient modes, which helps stretch battery life when keeping the Always-On display active.<\/p>\n
The Power Impact label helps users sort watch faces based on how they affect battery life.<\/p>\n
One new addition to the app is the \u201cLooks\u201d tab, which is Facer\u2019s take on a style feed. The tab lets you browse full setups that include a face, a strap, and styling notes. You can apply everything with one tap or shop the exact strap through the app. This feature has only rolled out to iOS users so far and is slated to arrive on Android phones in September. I\u2019ll be honest, I\u2019m not usually one to dress my wrist like I do my outfit, but if you like to match straps to faces, the Facer watch band store makes that super easy. There are a bunch of material types available in a range of colors, all for under $20. Premium users also get further discounts.<\/p>\n
Speaking of Premium: Facer is still free to try, and there are some free designs I genuinely love, but a lot more faces are locked behind a paywall. If you anticipate only buying one or two, one-off purchases are straightforward. However, a premium subscription unlocks the full face catalog and gives you access to all the licensed designs. Right now, there\u2019s a launch promo of $14.99 for the first year (normally $39.99 annually), plus 50% off watch bands and some free face promo codes. I\u2019ve been on the fence about paying for watch faces before, but with this kind of variety, I can see the value. You can also pay for Facer Plus to access an ad-free experience and a larger Watchbox for a one-time fee (right now $4.99). I will say, the ads on the app are pretty obnoxious, so the ad-free experience alone is tempting.<\/p>\n
![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/Facer-app-Harry-Styles-scaled.jpg\"\/ "\\"Facer")
<\/p>\n
Kaitlyn Cimino \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n
After a few days of rotating through designs, testing out \u201cLooks,\u201d and keeping an eye on battery life, the update makes a solid case for giving Facer your time and potentially your money. The app\u2019s comeback on Wear OS 6 feels more consistent and reliable. It\u2019s still a third-party app, and there\u2019s always going to be a slight gap between it and native experiences, but that gap is smaller. Is it worth subscribing just for customization? That\u2019ll depend on how often you switch up your look. Am I currently into this Harry Styles face? Maybe.<\/p>\n