{"id":344172,"date":"2025-08-14T15:21:14","date_gmt":"2025-08-14T15:21:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/344172\/"},"modified":"2025-08-14T15:21:14","modified_gmt":"2025-08-14T15:21:14","slug":"wolverhampton-cemeterys-extra-fee-for-wider-graves-criticised-as-fat-tax-wolverhampton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/344172\/","title":{"rendered":"Wolverhampton cemetery\u2019s extra fee for wider graves criticised as \u2018fat tax\u2019 | Wolverhampton"},"content":{"rendered":"

Residents of Wolverhampton<\/a> have criticised what is being called a \u201cfat tax\u201d on burial plots after a city cemetery imposed a premium on wider graves.<\/p>\n

Danescourt cemetery in Tettenhall will charge an extra 20% to families whose loved ones need a 6ft-wide plot, as opposed to a standard 5ft grave.<\/p>\n

Wolverhampton council said the price premium was in response to an increase in obesity levels in the city, where a third of people are obese, compared with the national average of just over a quarter.<\/p>\n

The council said it had contacted 25 funeral directors before introducing the measure, with only one of them posing an objection.<\/p>\n

The funeral director Ross Hickton told the BBC the charge was a \u201cfat tax\u201d and that it was \u201cnot really acceptable or fair\u201d.<\/p>\n

He said: \u201cYou know people have paid into the system their entire life, paid their council tax to Wolverhampton council, and for them to be told [the grave is] 20% more because of the size of their loved one, it\u2019s not really acceptable or fair.\u201d<\/p>\n

Matthew Crawley, the chief executive at the Institute of Cemetery and Crematorium Management, said the charge seemed reasonable. \u201cYou have a finite amount of space to work with; therefore if you need to eat into a grave next door, say, then that needs to be accounted for,\u201d he said. \u201cYou also have to account for the idea that digging the grave itself will also need extra equipment to keep it safe.\u201d<\/p>\n

The costs, the council said, reflected \u201cthe increased costs incurred in providing [wider graves], including disposing of the additional soil\u201d. \u201cMany other local councils, including Birmingham and Walsall, charge higher fees for larger graves,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n

Across the UK, the picture is mixed. A survey by the National Society of Allied and Independent Funeral Directors of its members found a quarter of local authorities charged extra for wider burial plots.<\/p>\n

skip past newsletter promotion<\/a><\/p>\n

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what\u2019s happening and why it matters<\/p>\n

Privacy Notice: <\/strong>Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy<\/a>. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy<\/a> and Terms of Service<\/a> apply.<\/p>\n

There was also a concern in Wolverhampton for couples who wanted to be buried together, but where one was already buried in a standard plot while the other needed to be buried in a larger grave.<\/p>\n

At Danescourt, the council said, \u201cwhile space allows, [families] will still be able to choose to place larger coffins at the end of existing rows\u201d at no extra cost\u201d. But otherwise, the council told a funeral director in an email seen by the BBC, the family would \u201chave to consider burying the bariatric partner elsewhere, purchasing a second grave or exhuming the first partner to ensure they can be buried together\u201d.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Residents of Wolverhampton have criticised what is being called a \u201cfat tax\u201d on burial plots after a city…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":344173,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[13,12,14],"class_list":{"0":"post-344172","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-news","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-top-stories"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115027803014537869","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=344172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/344172\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/344173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=344172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=344172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=344172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}