Officials claim it will save lives, justifying the money spent and the inconvenience to drivers.<\/p>\n
But now a study by Nottingham<\/a> University has found the speed crackdown has so far been ineffective in cutting serious injuries to those struck by vehicles.<\/p>\n Published in the journal Accident Analysis & Prevention, it concludes: \u2018The Glasgow 20mph scheme\u2026 has not significantly altered the disproportionately high risk of pedestrians being involved in severe collisions.\u2019<\/p>\n Hugh Bladon, of the Alliance of British Drivers, said: \u2018It\u2019s utter madness for Glasgow to be spending almost \u00a39 million on something that will achieve very little or nothing at all.<\/p>\n \u2019There are any number of reasons why there are collisions with pedestrians. The council would be better off trying to get through to those people who walk round with phones stuck to their ear, not looking where they\u2019re going – or those staggering into the road blind drunk.<\/p>\n \u2018The imposition of 20 mph zones seems to be a fetish among local authorities, but as this study shows, it\u2019s not something that will work everywhere. It\u2019s horses for courses.<\/p>\n SNP-led Glasgow council is spending a fortune turning almost every street into a 20mph zone<\/p>\n Hugh Bladon of the Alliance of British Drivers said the scheme was ‘madness’\u00a0<\/p>\n \u2018Councillors just like to be seen to be doing something, anything, however, they are wasting their time trying to force people out of their cars.<\/p>\n \u2018If 20 mph is the right speed to drive, motorists will drive at 20 mph. But if 30 mph is safe, why is there this mania for imposing restrictions on them?\u2019<\/p>\n The SNP-led local authority plans to spend a fortune turning almost every street under its jurisdiction into an ultra-low-speed zone<\/a>.<\/p>\n But this week, Glasgow admitted it\u2019s facing a financial crisis despite recently hiking council tax for its residents by 7.5 per cent.<\/p>\n Further inflation-busting rises would still leave it needing to find an extra \u00a380 million by 2028 to balance the books, mainly due to a surge in numbers of asylum seekers and homelessness applications by refugees.<\/p>\n The latest research, by engineering scholars at Nottingham and the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in Greece, studied traffic accidents in Glasgow and Edinburgh.<\/p>\n It took government data for the six years either side of the 20mph zones\u2019 start date in 2016 and looked at single-vehicle collisions involving pedestrians or cyclists.<\/p>\n The number of accidents has fallen in both cities, though this was partly due to the Covid-19 pandemic slashing traffic volumes on the roads between 2019 and 2022.<\/p>\n The 20mph crackdown in Glasgow is expected to reach \u00a38.59m, almost twice initial estimates<\/p>\n A new study shows the zones have not ‘significantly altered’ the risk to pedestrians<\/p>\n In Edinburgh, there is evidence that motorists are driving at lower speed on residential streets and taking that habit on to busier A-roads where collisions tend to cause more serious injuries.<\/p>\n But in Glasgow, the study suggests the opposite is the case with faster speeds on the many arterial routes cutting through the city continuing to set the tone in 20 mph zones.<\/p>\n The study states: \u2018Compliance with the new 20mph speed limit in the city centre may be lesser, particularly given the size and proximity of surrounding arterial roads, which could induce spill-over effects.\u2019<\/p>\n Additional risk factors were identified in both cities.<\/p>\n In Edinburgh, there are signs that extensive redesign of the city centre has caused confusion, leading to a significant rise in collisions on footways and verges.<\/p>\n Meanwhile in Glasgow, drivers under 26 and over 65 are now a risk factor in accidents, suggesting many in those age brackets are simply ignoring the 20mph speed limits.<\/p>\n There was no evidence in either city of cyclists now being safer.<\/p>\n The study concludes: \u2018In short, the 20mph network in Edinburgh appears to have significantly reduced the absolute number of vehicle\u2013pedestrian collisions, but the majority of this reduction is attributable to collisions resulting in slight injuries.<\/p>\n \u2018[However], the 20mph scheme in Glasgow has not significantly altered the existing vulnerability of pedestrians on city centre streets.\u2019<\/p>\n Most of Edinburgh\u2019s roads are now 20mph zones, barring the major arterial routes which fan out from the Old and New Towns.<\/p>\n However, in Glasgow the scheme is concentrated mainly in the centre and West End with numerous other localised pockets.<\/p>\n Consultants have advised expanding its reach to take in around 5,200 of the city\u2019s 5,700 streets.<\/p>\n The Daily Mail revealed in February that the crackdown\u2019s cost is expected to reach \u00a38.59m, almost twice initial estimates, with taxpayer-grant funding also coming from Bristol-based pro-cycling lobby group Sustrans.<\/p>\n![\"SNP-led](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/101485007-15027313-SNP_led_Glasgow_council_is_spending_a_fortune_turning_almost_eve-a-18_17559584938.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Hugh](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/101485001-15027313-Hugh_Bladon_of_the_Alliance_of_British_Drivers_said_the_scheme_w-a-15_17559584938.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n![\"The](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/101485005-15027313-The_20mph_crackdown_in_Glasgow_is_expected_to_reach_8_59m_almost-a-16_17559584938.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/101485009-15027313-A_new_study_shows_the_zones_have_not_significantly_altered_the_r-a-17_17559584938.jpeg\")
<\/p>\n