![\"John](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/0_image-15.jpg\")
John Sumner, 62 and of Huyton, appeared at Liverpool Crown Court to be sentenced for assault and a breach of a non-molestation order<\/p>\nJohn Sumner called his ex-partner a “f***ing rat” before throwing a cup of liquid into her faceJohn Sumner, 62 and of Huyton, appeared at Liverpool Crown Court to be sentenced for assault and a breach of a non-molestation order<\/p>\n
A mum said she wants “peace, safety and the chance to rebuild her life” after her ex-partner carried out a degrading attack. Cheryl Boydell had at one time been in a happy relationship with John Sumner, but it turned “toxic” largely due to his issues with excessive drinking.<\/p>\n
In a disgusting incident in February this year, Sumner called his ex-partner a “f***ing rat” before he threw a cup of liquid into her face, claiming at the time that it was urine. The 62-year-old of Salerno Drive in Huyton<\/a> later breached a non-molestation order as part of the same course of harassment.<\/p>\n In a victim impact statement read to the court on Thursday this week, Ms Boydell said: “No words that can truly capture someone you once loved turn on you, he threw liquid in my face and I still struggle to understand how a human does that to another.<\/p>\n “I didn\u2019t know if it was acid or something meant to blind me. His response was degrading. He continued to verbally abuse me. I have a 21-year-old daughter who is autistic, since then she sees everything differently. She lives in fear that he will return.<\/p>\n “The act wasn\u2019t random, it was someone who knew me. This wasn\u2019t an assault on me but on the emotional safety of me and my daughter\u2019s home. All I want is peace, safety and the chance to rebuild our lives.”<\/p>\n The court heard police were first called to Ms Boydell’s address at around 8.30pm on February 22, but the complainant “just wanted him away from the property”. Three days later she saw her ex-partner\u2019s van was still outside her address and asked him to collect it that day before he went to the pub.<\/p>\n The defendant picked up the van and temporarily left. But soon after he saw Ms Boydell at the local shops, hurling an insult at her. She returned home but a short time later the defendant followed. She recalled seeing her ex-partner holding a cup, which he proceeded to throw the contents of over her.<\/p>\n The court heard when Ms Boydell asked what it was, Sumner replied: “P***.” He then got back in his van and left. He was later arrested by police officers and told them the cup contained urine.<\/p>\n But Ms Olivia Randell, prosecuting, said: “It could not be proved what it was and the defendant went on to say that it was an energy drink.” The court heard a non-molestation order was put in place on April 28 which prevented the defendant from contacting his ex-partner. However, he breached this on May 12.<\/p>\n The court heard the defendant had four previous convictions for 11 offences<\/a>. Most recently this was four breaches of a different non-molestation order regarding a different ex-partner in 2022.<\/p>\n Sumner was originally charged with administering poison\/a noxious thing with intent to injure, aggrieve or annoy. However, after the crown was unable to prove it was in fact urine that he threw, he pleaded guilty to an alternative of common assault and breach of a non-molestation order<\/a>.<\/p>\n Matthew O\u2019Neill, defending, told the court: “The defendant has accepted throwing the liquid at the complainant but the issue was he denied it was urine. A number of weeks later the crown could not prove it was urine. Had the crown offered that offence in the magistrates\u2019 court, he would have pleaded there and then.<\/p>\n “He accepted the assault. Perhaps there is a case for full credit. The defendant is clearly someone with issues with alcohol. He says it was the main cause of the breakdown of their relationship.<\/p>\n “Excessive use of alcohol has been a case since his younger brother took his own life 20\/30 years ago. He is a hardworking individual. He informed his employer after his arrest and was suspended due to the outstanding proceedings.”<\/p>\n Mr O\u2019Neill added before the breaches of the non-molestation order in respect of his previous partner, he had not been in trouble for 42 years. He added the defendant was a full-term carer for his mum.<\/p>\n Mr O\u2019Neill told the court his client had “shown remorse” and, if given the opportunity, would “grab with both hands” the chance to address his alcohol issues.<\/p>\n Sentencing, Judge John McGarva told the defendant the offences were more serious because they were in a domestic context and he had acted in a similar fashion in a previous relationship. The judge told Sumner his behaviour was “very childish” but also “horrible and degrading” for the victim.<\/p>\n He added: “It would have caused a great amount of fear.” Judge McGarva accepted the defendant had shown some remorse, but that there were also elements of victim blaming that would need to change if he wanted a relationship in the future.<\/p>\n