{"id":369358,"date":"2025-08-24T08:44:12","date_gmt":"2025-08-24T08:44:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/369358\/"},"modified":"2025-08-24T08:44:12","modified_gmt":"2025-08-24T08:44:12","slug":"a-dangerous-moment-the-emboldening-of-britains-far-right-immigration-and-asylum","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/369358\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018A dangerous moment\u2019: the emboldening of Britain\u2019s far right | Immigration and asylum"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Bell hotel in Epping has seen a lot since it was built in the 16th century as a coaching inn, serving travellers passing through the historic Essex market town and on to London, 15 miles to the south-west. This has long been a place that bustled with outsiders, though they have not always been welcome \u2013 the small green common opposite was once named after a beacon<\/a> that local stories say was built<\/a> to warn of invasion.<\/p>\n

Though now wrapped in ugly 1960s extensions that have stripped it of anything approaching charm, the unassuming building \u2013 close to agricultural land and a cricket pitch \u2013 is an unlikely place to spark a potential political crisis.<\/p>\n

That is what the government may be facing, however, after the high court ruled<\/a> this week that the Home Office\u2019s use of the Bell hotel to house asylum seekers breached planning laws. Epping Forest district council had challenged the government after the hotel became a flashpoint for anti-refugee protests, after a Syrian man who had been placed there was arrested and charged over the alleged sexual assault of a 14-year-old girl.<\/p>\n

Local protesters and the Conservative-led council are jubilant but the implications of ousting the hotel\u2019s 140 male residents<\/a> to as yet unknown locations could be far more widespread. Dozens of local authorities<\/a>, some of which have also been the focus of protests, are considering similar legal challenges, which could throw the government\u2019s entire asylum project into disarray<\/a> and which one insider admitted this week has left the Home Office \u201creeling\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This case may turn on planning law but there are plenty who see this as a much bigger victory, after a febrile summer in which thousands of people<\/a> again have crossed the Channel in small boats, anti-migrant protests<\/a> have taken place<\/a> in more than 40 locations, and nationalistic and anti-refugee rhetoric has been embraced by politicians across the spectrum and amplified by sections of the media.<\/p>\n

There has not been widespread rioting<\/a> of the kind that occurred last summer, sparked by the murder of three girls at a dance class in Southport and false rumours<\/a> that the perpetrator was a Muslim asylum seeker. But as communities braced for further widespread protests<\/a> this weekend, a campaign to raise the flags of St George and the union jack across the country gathered pace<\/a>, declaring as patriotism what many others have experienced in their villages or streets as clear intimidation. According to the anti-extremist groups Hope Not Hate <\/a>and Stand Up to Racism, the apparently spontaneous campaign has in fact been organised by well-known far-right figures.<\/p>\n

Protesters calling for asylum seekers to be removed from the Bell hotel gather outside the council offices in Epping on 8 August. Photograph: Henry Nicholls\/AFP\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are in a dangerous moment,\u201d says Lewis Nielsen, an anti-fascist officer at Stand Up to Racism. In the context of increased far-right protests and encouraging political rhetoric, he says, \u201cthe \u2018Operation Raise the Colours\u2019 was never about flags, it\u2019s about giving confidence to racists and fascists to target refugees and migrants\u201d.<\/p>\n

Saturday\u2019s protests largely passed without incident. While demonstrators and police clashed in places, there were not the scenes of civil unrest from last summer. However, refugee and even minority communities are experiencing real consequences, illustrated by countless small but terrifying incidents. In Redcar, North Yorkshire, a black man filmed playing with his white granddaughters has been racially abused<\/a> and falsely called a paedophile after the short video clip was amplified online by the far-right activist Tommy Robinson<\/a>. In east Belfast, a small group of vigilantes have been seeking out dark-skinned men<\/a> to shout abuse at or demand to see their identity documents.<\/p>\n

Writing in the Guardian<\/a> on Friday, the Refugee Council\u2019s chief executive, Enver Solomon, said some food banks that previously served all in need were now turning away perceived \u201cforeigners\u201d. He also described meeting an African man in his 60s in north-east England who had been attacked by a group of men \u2013 his arm was broken \u2013 and was terrified of leaving his accommodation.<\/p>\n

This was shortly after Keir Starmer said tough curbs on immigration were needed to prevent Britain becoming an \u201cisland of strangers\u201d<\/a>. Solomon wrote: \u201cThose who have worked with refugees for decades tell me they have never known a time when the hostility has been so strong and the environment so toxic.\u201d Other refugee charities have had to install safe rooms<\/a> or even close their offices in response to death threats and intimidation.<\/p>\n

Starmer has since said he \u201cdeeply regrets<\/a>\u201d his \u201cisland of strangers\u201d remark, but there has been little sign otherwise of a rollback of the rhetoric. This week his spokesperson offered an apparent endorsement of the flag-raising campaign, describing the prime minister as a \u201cpatriot\u201d who believed people should \u201cabsolutely\u201d fly flags.<\/p>\n

A St George\u2019s cross hangs from a lamp-post in east London. Photograph: Carlos Jasso\/AFP\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, has said women are afraid to walk in parks<\/a> for fear of being harassed by refugee men \u201clurking in bushes\u201d. The shadow minister Robert Jenrick, seen as a potential successor as party leader, has been pictured at anti-migrant rallies<\/a> attended by known members of the far right, and attaching a flag to a lamp-post in defiance of \u201cBritain-hating\u201d councils<\/a> who have asked for them not to be attached to street infrastructure. The Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, called for widespread protests<\/a> outside other hotels housing new arrivals.<\/p>\n

Paul Jackson, a professor of history at the University of Northampton whose work includes a focus on far-right extremism, says: \u201cWhat I find quite concerning is that it\u2019s creating an opportunity for the far right to grow. We\u2019ve seen Labour politicians be supportive in principle of concern around protests at migration hotels, leaning into the populist right. We\u2019ve seen Reform politicians very strongly legitimise these concerns.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a lot of concern about the emboldenment of the far right, and also the limited voices within the political mainstream calling for a different narrative around issues of migration. It would be good to see a little more moral leadership rather than pandering.\u201d<\/p>\n

Jackson identifies a number of factors behind the current situation, including the ascent of Donald Trump in the US. One fundamental factor, he says, is a collapse in trust in government responses to asylum and migration.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve seen over the last generation a breakdown in trust in government policymaking around migration, and I think that\u2019s partly thanks to mainstream politicians\u2019 failure to speak truthfully on this issue.\u201d<\/p>\n

A search and rescue vessel shadows a small boat as it sets off into the Channel heading for the UK on 15 August. Photograph: Dan Kitwood\/Getty Images<\/p>\n

Sunder Katwala, the director of the thinktank British Future<\/a>, which researches public attitudes on immigration and national identity, points to the lack of government voices pushing back against the protests.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe Labour government is very quiet about racism this year compared to last, because it doesn\u2019t want to accidentally sound as if it\u2019s criticising people with legitimate concerns and so on,\u201d he says. \u201cThe mainstream right and the mainstream centre-left have stopped doing the boundary-calling, and I think Reform, the Conservatives and sometimes the government are now crossing the line, because they\u2019re unwilling to criticise anybody, whatever they\u2019re saying.\u201d<\/p>\n

Katwala stresses there has been no repeat of last year\u2019s violence at protests, which for the most part have been numerically small, and points to polling showing that similar proportions of people believe the UK should accept fewer refugees as think it should take more (though the percentage who are welcoming has fallen since 2023, according to YouGov<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Politics may be tilting right and the voices of those opposed to migration may be louder, but Katwala says: \u201cThe long-term trends in British society on tolerance of people across ethnic and faith lines are powerfully and strongly in a pro-tolerance, pro-liberal direction\u201d \u2013 and markedly stronger in the UK than elsewhere in Europe or the US.<\/p>\n

No voice has been more striking on this than the family of Bebe King, one of the girls murdered in Southport, who hit out at the \u201cdespicable\u201d actions of the far right who had \u201ctried to make political gain from our tragedy\u201d. Speaking to the Guardian<\/a> earlier this month, Bebe\u2019s grandfather Michael Weston King urged ministers to reconsider plans to change the law to give the ethnicity of suspects, describing it as \u201capparent kowtowing to the likes of Farage and Reform, [which] is extremely disappointing, though perhaps not surprising\u201d.<\/p>\n

A significant silent majority is tolerant and welcoming of refugees, says Katwala, but ongoing dysfunction in the asylum system does not help. \u201cChaos isn\u2019t good for advocates of refugee protection. So the left of this debate has definitely got an interest in the government showing it can control asylum while taking refugees,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think the government really does have to get a grip on the visible lack of control in the Channel itself and in hotels in the towns where people live. If we don\u2019t do that, there are political risks to them, but also there are risks to the principle of refugee protection.\u201d<\/p>\n

Quick GuideContact us about this storyShow\"\"<\/p>\n

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.<\/p>\n

If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.<\/p>\n

Secure Messaging in the Guardian app<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.<\/p>\n

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS<\/a>\/Android<\/a>) and go to the menu. Select \u2018Secure Messaging\u2019. <\/p>\n

SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you can safely use the tor network without being observed or monitored you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Finally, our guide at theguardian.com\/tips<\/a>\u00a0lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Illustration: Guardian Design \/ Rich Cousins<\/p>\n

Thank you for your feedback.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Bell hotel in Epping has seen a lot since it was built in the 16th century as…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":369359,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5018,3,4],"tags":[748,393,4884,1144,712,16,15,1764],"class_list":{"0":"post-369358","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-britain","8":"category-uk","9":"category-united-kingdom","10":"tag-britain","11":"tag-england","12":"tag-great-britain","13":"tag-northern-ireland","14":"tag-scotland","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom","17":"tag-wales"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115082865225361183","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=369358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369358\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/369359"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=369358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=369358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=369358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}