{"id":373674,"date":"2025-08-26T00:54:13","date_gmt":"2025-08-26T00:54:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/373674\/"},"modified":"2025-08-26T00:54:13","modified_gmt":"2025-08-26T00:54:13","slug":"was-1995-30-years-ago-googles-ai-overviews-is-having-issues-with-a-simple-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/373674\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Was 1995 30 years ago?&#8217; Google&#8217;s AI overviews is having issues with a simple question"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the year 2025, it seems we&#8217;re hearing frequent warnings about impending doom via <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/category\/artificial-intelligence\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">artificial intelligence<\/a>. And that&#8217;s not without some merit: Heck, AI <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/glassdoor-indeed-cutting-1300-jobs-ai\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">is causing job loss<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/midjourney-meta-partnership-announced-alexandr-wang\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">filling our social feeds<\/a> with fairly convincing slop. <\/p>\n<p>But sometimes, the world sends a reminder that our AI tools are a <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/terminator-dark-fate-movie-review\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">far cry from Schwarzeneggerian<\/a> domination. For instance, Google&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/google-ai-overviews-2025-review\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">much-maligned AI Overviews<\/a> is, at times, struggling to decipher if 1995 was, in fact, 30 years ago. For the mathematically challenged, yes it was, because, well, 2025 minus 1995 equals 30. But don&#8217;t go telling that to Google.<\/p>\n<p>People online noticed Google&#8217;s AI Overviews seemed to have trouble with this particular query. It became almost a trend of sorts to ask, &#8220;Was 1995 30 years ago?&#8221; Lots of people posted screenshots appearing to show Google answering with incorrect answers \u2014 typically speaking, AI Overviews decided 1995 was 29 years ago, for some reason.<\/p>\n<p>We tested the query at Mashable, and did \u2014 at least sometimes \u2014<strong> <\/strong>replicate the results of these screenshots and get an incorrect answer from Google&#8217;s AI Overviews<\/p>\n<p>\n            Mashable Light Speed\n        <\/p>\n<p>Here is a screenshot from a Mashable editor. <\/p>\n<p>                    <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"w-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/images-1.fill.size_2000x1108.v1756140529.png\" alt=\"screenshot of google answering was 1995 30 years ago wrong\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1108\" loading=\"lazy\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>            Credit: Mashable \/ Screenshot: Google\n        <\/p>\n<p>When I tried to recreate the results, Google, at first, correctly answered the question. But later, it answered both incorrectly and correctly. The AI Overview spat out a garbled response that said 1995 was both 29 years ago and 30 years ago. Mashable has reached out to Google for comment and will update as necessary. <\/p>\n<p>                    <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"w-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/images-2.fill.size_2000x1521.v1756140529.png\" alt=\"google both incorrectly and correctly answering was 1995 30 years ago\" width=\"2000\" height=\"1521\" loading=\"lazy\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>            Credit: Mashable \/ Screenshot: Google\n        <\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ve <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/google-ai-overviews-2025-review\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">covered Google&#8217;s often confidently wrong AI Overviews at Mashable<\/a>. There was that trend where <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/google-ai-overviews-made-up-idioms\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">it would invent meaning for any made-up idiom<\/a>. Or <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/google-ai-overviews-gets-basic-questions-wrong\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">when it struggled to get the year right<\/a>. Or the time it <a href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/article\/mnf-google-onside-kick-misinformation\" target=\"_blank\" data-ga-click=\"1\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" data-ga-item=\"text-link\" data-ga-module=\"content_body\" rel=\"noopener\">got the NFL rules wrong<\/a> during a high-profile game, causing a lot of confusion. <\/p>\n<p>Despite these repeated issues and mistakes, Google continues to feed users more AI Overviews. Remember to double-check your sources&#8230;or maybe just break out your calculator. <\/p>\n<p>\n        Topics<br \/>\n                    <a class=\"underline-link hover:no-underline text-secondary-300 mr-1.5\" href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/category\/artificial-intelligence\" aria-label=\"Navigate to the Artificial Intelligence tag\" data-ga-click=\"\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Artificial Intelligence<\/a><br \/>\n                    <a class=\"underline-link hover:no-underline text-secondary-300 \" href=\"https:\/\/mashable.com\/category\/google\" aria-label=\"Navigate to the Google tag\" data-ga-click=\"\" data-ga-label=\"$text\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Google<\/a>\n            <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In the year 2025, it seems we&#8217;re hearing frequent warnings about impending doom via artificial intelligence. And that&#8217;s&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":373675,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3163],"tags":[323,1942,53,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-373674","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-artificial-intelligence","8":"tag-ai","9":"tag-artificial-intelligence","10":"tag-technology","11":"tag-uk","12":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115092341672991369","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=373674"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/373674\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373675"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=373674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=373674"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=373674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}