{"id":387342,"date":"2025-08-31T15:21:10","date_gmt":"2025-08-31T15:21:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/387342\/"},"modified":"2025-08-31T15:21:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-31T15:21:10","slug":"rigetti-computing-time-to-buy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/387342\/","title":{"rendered":"Rigetti Computing: Time to Buy?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Key Points<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p>Rigetti&#8217;s 36-qubit multichip quantum computer achieves 99.5% state-of-the-art gate fidelity, validating its chiplet scaling approach.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>A strong balance sheet with $571.6 million in cash provides a runway through 2026, despite minimal revenues.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>Extreme valuation at 495 times sales highlights the speculative nature of quantum computing investments.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p>10 stocks we like better than Rigetti Computing \u203a<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Rigetti Computing<\/strong> (NASDAQ: RGTI) has surged 1,820% over the past 12 months &#8212; topping <strong>D-Wave Quantum<\/strong>&#8216;s (NYSE: QBTS) 1,550% gain and <strong>IonQ<\/strong>&#8216;s 505% (NYSE: IONQ). Yet, today&#8217;s $5.3 billion market cap looks disconnected from a company posting just $1.8 million in quarterly revenue while losing nearly $40 million in the most recent quarter.<\/p>\n<p>Investors are paying venture-style multiples for technology that still lacks commercial traction. Yet, the massive opportunity inherent in quantum computing could make this tech stock a steal &#8212; even at these elevated levels. Let&#8217;s dig deeper to find out whether this premium-laden growth stock is worth the price of admission.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Where to invest $1,000 right now?<\/strong> Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the <strong>10 best stocks <\/strong>to buy right now. <strong>Continue \u00bb<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"A clock with hands that read time to buy.\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/time-to-buy.jpg&#038;w=700.jpeg\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"caption\">Image source: Getty Images.<\/p>\n<p>Technical breakthroughs mask commercial struggles<\/p>\n<p>In August 2025, Rigetti&#8217;s modular 36-qubit system &#8212; four 9-qubit chiplets linked together &#8212; achieved 99.5% median two-qubit gate fidelity, halving errors from its Ankaa-3 machine. A 100-plus qubit chiplet system is targeted by year-end. Think of it like building a supercomputer from many processors instead of one impossible monolith.<\/p>\n<p>Rigetti&#8217;s superconducting qubits operate at fractions of a degree above absolute zero. The company&#8217;s two-qubit gates run in tens of nanoseconds, versus tens of microseconds for trapped-ion or neutral-atom systems &#8212; roughly 100 to 1,000 times faster. Faster gates allow more operations within limited coherence times, though rival platforms often deliver higher fidelities and longer lifetimes.<\/p>\n<p>On the financial front, second-quarter 2025 revenue fell to $1.8 million from $3.1 million a year ago, reflecting contract timing. Income comes from cloud access, custom algorithm work, and government research and development (R&amp;D). Operating losses of $19.9 million in the most recent quarter underscore the capital-intensive nature of this nascent field.<\/p>\n<p>In short, technical progress is ramping while revenues remain minimal.<\/p>\n<p>Government validation provides crucial backing<\/p>\n<p>DARPA tapped Rigetti as a performer in its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative &#8212; a program seeking &#8220;utility-scale&#8221; quantum computers by 2033 &#8212; alongside <strong>IBM<\/strong> and IonQ. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency&#8217;s (DARPA) track record includes the internet, GPS, and stealth aircraft, making its backing a meaningful vote of confidence.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Washington is advancing the National Quantum Initiative (NQI) Reauthorization Act (approximately $2.7 billion) and the Department of Energy Quantum Leadership Act (approximately $2.5 billion). Europe has pledged about 2 billion euros at the European Union (E.U.) level and another 9 billion euros from member states.<\/p>\n<p>China&#8217;s widely cited $10 billion for quantum computing projects represents a one-time Hefei National Lab project, not recurring spend. The bottom line is that global governments are racing to fund credible players in this emerging space.<\/p>\n<p>How does Rigetti fit into this government-backed innovation bonanza? Rigetti manufactures at its Fab-1 facility using semiconductor-style modular methods. By wiring smaller chips into larger systems, it sidesteps yield issues that plagued single-chip designs. IBM&#8217;s 1,121-qubit Condor processor (2023) underscored the limits of monolithic scaling and pushed IBM itself toward modular architectures.<\/p>\n<p>Put simply, Rigetti was ahead of the curve in employing modular designs &#8212; a critical decision that could translate into a key competitive advantage.<\/p>\n<p>Extreme valuation demands caution<\/p>\n<p>Rigetti raised $350 million in Q2 via an at-the-market program, ending the quarter with $571.6 million in cash and no debt. That buys time through 2026, but the opportunistic raise at lofty prices signals management&#8217;s awareness that current valuations may not last.<\/p>\n<p>At a $5.3 billion market cap on approximately $11 million-ish in trailing revenue, Rigetti stock trades at around 495 times sales. By comparison, traditional semiconductor giant <strong>Nvidia<\/strong> trades at approximately 40 times forward earnings &#8212; with profits, proven demand, and a rock-solid moat. While rich, Nvidia&#8217;s premium pales in comparison to those of Rigetti and other pure-play quantum stocks, all of which are cash-flow negative at the moment.<\/p>\n<p>A speculative bet on computing&#8217;s future<\/p>\n<p>Quantum computing could be the next revolution &#8212; or an expensive science experiment. Rigetti&#8217;s 36-qubit milestone and DARPA backing validate its chiplet strategy, and $571.6 million in cash provides breathing room.<\/p>\n<p>Still, at 495 times trailing sales, the stock&#8217;s valuation prices in perfection. Thus, risk-tolerant investors might cap exposure at no more than 2% of a well-diversified portfolio. For most, though, it makes sense to wait for proof of real commercial traction before betting on Rigetti as a breakthrough play in quantum&#8217;s uncertain future.<\/p>\n<p>Should you invest $1,000 in Rigetti Computing right now?<\/p>\n<p>Before you buy stock in Rigetti Computing, consider this:<\/p>\n<p>The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the <strong>10 best stocks<\/strong> for investors to buy now\u2026 and Rigetti Computing wasn\u2019t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.<\/p>\n<p>Consider when <strong>Netflix<\/strong> made this list on December 17, 2004&#8230; if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, <strong>you\u2019d have $651,599<\/strong>!* Or when <strong>Nvidia<\/strong> made this list on April 15, 2005&#8230; if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, <strong>you\u2019d have $1,067,639<\/strong>!*<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u2019s worth noting Stock Advisor\u2019s total average return is 1,049% \u2014 a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&amp;P 500. Don\u2019t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>See the 10 stocks \u00bb<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>*Stock Advisor returns as of August 25, 2025<\/p>\n<p>George Budwell has positions in D-Wave Quantum, IonQ, Nvidia, and Rigetti Computing. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends International Business Machines and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.<\/p>\n<p>Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Key Points Rigetti&#8217;s 36-qubit multichip quantum computer achieves 99.5% state-of-the-art gate fidelity, validating its chiplet scaling approach. A&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":387343,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3164],"tags":[3284,53,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-387342","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-computing","8":"tag-computing","9":"tag-technology","10":"tag-uk","11":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115124062498518946","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=387342"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387342\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/387343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=387342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=387342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=387342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}