{"id":390633,"date":"2025-09-02T01:09:10","date_gmt":"2025-09-02T01:09:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/390633\/"},"modified":"2025-09-02T01:09:10","modified_gmt":"2025-09-02T01:09:10","slug":"king-charles-relationship-with-harry-is-the-most-important-thing-royals-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/390633\/","title":{"rendered":"King Charles’ relationship with Harry is ‘the most important thing’ – Royals – News"},"content":{"rendered":"

The British monarchy is still standing because of its continuity and adaptability, and for King Charles<\/a> to turn his back on his younger son, Prince Harry<\/a>, he\u2019s turning his back on the foundation of the institution, says one royal expert.<\/p>\n

Speaking exclusively to Daily Express US, Ian Pelham Turner<\/a> shared his thoughts on the pending reconciliation between Harry and Charles, which may happen as early as next week.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

We asked Mr. Pelham Turner, a former royal photographer, if Charles could have a relationship with both of his sons, William<\/a>, 43, and Harry<\/a>, 40, even if they don\u2019t get along, with the royal expert saying: \u201cHe has to.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pelham Turner spent time at the Palace as a royal photographer and crossed paths with both Princess Diana and the then-Prince Charles, which gives him good insight into royal life.<\/p>\n

During a Zoom call, he said: \u201cCharles has had a great deal of experience, as well, and he\u2019s had the Queen to guide him, most of the time, continuity of monarchy is the most important thing of the lot.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pelham Turner spent time at the Palace as a royal photographer, and crossed paths with both Princess Diana and the then-Prince Charles, which gives him good insight into royal life.<\/p>\n

During a Zoom call, he said: \u201cCharles has had a great deal of experience, as well, and he\u2019s had the Queen to guide him, most of the time, continuity of monarchy is the most important thing of the lot.\u201d<\/p>\n

According to Pelham Turner, the more people try to vilify Harry and Meghan,they are actually just making Harry and Meghan more relevant.<\/p>\n

He explained: \u201cIn reality, the biggest mistake that anyone from the British side is trying to do to vilify Harry and Meghan, the big mistake is that all it does in Britain is remind people of Harry and Meghan.\u201d<\/p>\n

DON\u2019T MISS:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Prince William thinks King Charles and Prince Harry meeting is ‘a terrible idea’<\/a><\/strong>
Prince William and Kate\u2019s position at risk if Harry and Meghan make major move<\/a><\/strong>
Prince William ‘refuses to meet’ Prince Harry during trip as ‘trust is eroded’<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Charles is being urged to have relationships with both of his sons in the name of continuity<\/p>\n

The thing that bugs Pelham Turner the most is that there\u2019s a lot of chatter about Harry and Meghan, but it\u2019s not necessarily substantiated, as the sources go unidentified.<\/p>\n

Pelham Turner is not one to mince words, he says it how it is, and is not afraid to put it on the record, and he’s asking the same of his peers, who provide royal commentary.<\/p>\n

During our chat, he argued his case: \u201cIt\u2019s just logic. If they laid off Harry and Meghan, there’s a lot of books coming out knocking Harry and Meghan again, and what the Queen said, and all this stuff, and what I always say to all of these authors is \u2018name your sources.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

He added: \u201cIf this is the case, then name your sources, it\u2019s always used as \u2018someone close to the Royal Family,\u2019 name your sources.\u201d<\/p>\n

Pelham Turner went one step further complimenting American media.<\/p>\n

He said: \u201cI love the way American media works, you have a much greater depth in naming your sources, I know you protect them at times, I think you have a much more fundamental, cleaner method of journalism.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The British monarchy is still standing because of its continuity and adaptability, and for King Charles to turn…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":390634,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7708],"tags":[7709,518,1281,447,5105,7710,519,448],"class_list":{"0":"post-390633","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-royals","8":"tag-british-royal-family","9":"tag-king-charles-iii","10":"tag-meghan-markle","11":"tag-prince-harry","12":"tag-royal","13":"tag-royal-families","14":"tag-royal-family","15":"tag-royals"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115132037059990340","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390633","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=390633"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/390633\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/390634"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=390633"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=390633"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=390633"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}