{"id":397759,"date":"2025-09-04T17:04:11","date_gmt":"2025-09-04T17:04:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/397759\/"},"modified":"2025-09-04T17:04:11","modified_gmt":"2025-09-04T17:04:11","slug":"eu-agri-food-groups-dismiss-brussels-mercosur-safeguard-plan-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/397759\/","title":{"rendered":"EU agri-food groups dismiss Brussels’ Mercosur \u201csafeguard\u201d plan\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"\/<\/p>\n

Mercosur and European Union flag. Credit: Beto Gomez\/ Shutterstock<\/p>\n

EU agri-food organisations have criticised \u201csafeguard\u201d mechanisms drawn up to protect the sector under the pending trade agreement with South America\u2019s Mercosur bloc.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yesterday (3 September), the European Commission (EC) submitted proposals to finalise the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) trade pact, which was announced in December<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"\/ Discover B2B Marketing That Performs <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\tCombine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n


\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tFind out more <\/a><\/p>\n

Some agri-food groups in Europe have expressed concern that the deal could drive up competition and lower prices and product standards.<\/p>\n

Under the EC\u2019s proposals, Brussels has pledged to monitor the market closely, assess import impacts, and regularly update both the Council and the European Parliament.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

For instance, if import levels rise by more than 10% or prices fall sharply, Brussels could temporarily suspend or reduce agreed tariff concessions.<\/p>\n

The agreement limits preferential imports of specific products, such as beef and poultry, to low percentages of EU production.<\/p>\n

However, nine organisations, including principal EU farming lobby Copa-Cogeca and AVEC, representing the poultry sector, claimed the EC\u2019s package still \u201cfalls short\u201d.\u202f\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cWhile this initiative clarifies certain aspects of safeguard implementation, critical questions remain over how such a unilateral legal act would be voted on, enforced, and accepted by Mercosur countries as a binding commitment by the Commission,\u201d the statement read.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The groups, which also included sugar-manufacturing association CEFS and beet-growers body CIBE, reiterated their long-standing objections concerning disparities in production standards and unresolved sustainability issues, which they argue remain the \u201ccore and unresolved problem\u201d of the agreement.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

They further criticised the Commission\u2019s claim of having addressed farmers\u2019 concerns, stating that EU agriculture \u201ccontinues to be treated as a bargaining chip in trade negotiations\u201d.<\/p>\n

The EU-Mercosur trade deal, originally agreed in 2019 after more than 20 years of negotiation, has faced repeated delays<\/a> due to opposition from several EU member states, including Ireland and France.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

If ratified, it would establish the \u201cworld\u2019s biggest free trade zone\u201d, encompassing a market of over 700 million people, the EC says.<\/p>\n

It claims the agreement could lead to a 39% rise in EU exports to Mercosur countries, potentially reaching \u20ac49bn ($57bn) annually, with estimated support for more than 440,000 jobs across the bloc.<\/p>\n

EC president Ursula von der Leyen said: \u201cWe are continuing to diversify our trade, foster new partnerships and create new business opportunities. EU businesses and the EU agri-food sector will immediately reap the benefits of lower tariffs and lower costs, contributing to economic growth and job creation.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Agri-food exports alone are expected to increase by nearly 50%, with tariff reductions proposed for European wine, spirits, chocolate, and olive oil.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The deal also \u201cestablishes\u202frobust safeguards\u202fprotecting sensitive European products against any harmful surge in imports from Mercosur. In this sense, the Commission proposes to supplement the agreement with a legal act that operationalises the bilateral safeguards chapter of the EMPA.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Christophe Hansen, the EU Commissioner for Agriculture and Food, said the \u201cagreement is balanced for the EU agri-food sector\u201d and the \u201cimports will be limited and our farmers\u2019 interests carefully safeguarded\u201d.\u202f<\/p>\n

The wine industry in Europe has expressed support for the deal.\u00a0The European Committee of Wine Companies (CEEV) welcomed the Commission\u2019s adoption of both the Mercosur and Mexico agreements.\u00a0<\/p>\n

CEEV president Marzia Varvaglione said: \u201cAt a time of increasing geopolitical and economic challenges, it is more important than ever for the EU to secure and diversify its trade relations with trusted partners.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

Varvaglione even called on the European Parliament and the Council to \u201cswiftly advance the ratification process so that wine businesses and wine consumers on both sides can benefit from these historic agreements without delay\u201d.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Email<\/p>\n

\n Sign up for our weekly news round-up!
\n Give your business an edge with our leading industry insights.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Mercosur and European Union flag. Credit: Beto Gomez\/ Shutterstock EU agri-food organisations have criticised \u201csafeguard\u201d mechanisms drawn up…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":396887,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5174],"tags":[2000,299,5187,137064,104055,7911,137065,137066,137067],"class_list":{"0":"post-397759","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-eu","8":"tag-eu","9":"tag-europe","10":"tag-european","11":"tag-fresh-produce","12":"tag-frozen","13":"tag-meat","14":"tag-pan-industry","15":"tag-refrigerated","16":"tag-shelf-stable"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115147116814906244","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=397759"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397759\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/396887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=397759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=397759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}