Key events<\/p>\n
Show key events only<\/p>\n
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/p>\n
Trade minister Douglas Alexander<\/strong> has indicated that he trusted Angela Rayner<\/strong> and said she was in politics \u201cfor the right reasons\u201d.<\/p>\n Asked whether he trusted the deputy prime minister, Alexander told Times Radio:<\/p>\n Listen, I really want to live in a country in which someone with Angela Rayner\u2019s circumstances and background can rise to one of the highest offices in the country.<\/p>\n I have to say I should declare an interest \u2013 I really like Angela Rayner. We\u2019re a rather improbable group of friends. We come from very different circumstances \u2026 if you look at the challenges that Angela Rayner has overcome, not only do I like and respect her but, yes, I think she\u2019s in politics for the right reasons.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n (L-R): Douglas Alexander, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar, deputy prime minister Angela Rayner and Martin Whitfield MSP visit a distillery in East Lothian, Scotland, in 2024. Photograph: Murdo MacLeod\/The Guardian<\/p>\n Alexander<\/strong> also reiterated that a \u201crigorous testing process\u201d would be followed in the investigation into Rayner\u2019s tax affairs as he declined to answer questions about her future.<\/p>\n Alexander told Times Radio:<\/p>\n I think most of your listeners, as they think about it, they think about their own workplace or their own circumstances, they would want due process to be followed. That will be a rigorous testing process.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n He added:<\/p>\n The expectation is [Sir Laurie Magnus] works in a very comprehensive but also a pretty expeditious way \u2026 it will be for the prime minister, as always, to make judgments in relation to his ministers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n He said he did not know \u201cwho said what to whom\u201d but the \u201cright person\u201d to ask those questions and have them answered was Sir Laurie Magnus<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n A minister conceded there was \u201cfrustration\u201d as the investigation into Angela Rayner<\/strong>\u2019s tax affairs continues and said it would be a \u201cgood thing\u201d for the government if the probe concluded quickly.<\/p>\n Trade minister Douglas Alexander<\/strong> told BBC Breakfast:<\/p>\n The real test is not do these issues arise, but how does the government deal with them? We have this strengthened, independent office of ministerial standards. He\u2019s conducting the inquiry. Once that\u2019s concluded, it will go to the prime minister\u2019s desk.<\/p>\n I would just ask your viewers to think, what would they want, in their circumstances, in their workplace, of course, there need to be procedures. There\u2019s frustration while that process is under way, but I think everyone is entitled to due process, and that\u2019s the process that\u2019s under way, but, listen, I get it.<\/p>\n I\u2019m not pretending these are headlines that any of us would choose, least of all Angela Rayner, and that\u2019s why, if the reports are true that this is going to be dealt with relatively quickly, of course, I think that\u2019s basically a good thing, not just for Angela, but for the government as well.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Alexander said Keir Starmer<\/strong> was being \u201cvery careful\u201d in an interview in which he refused to say whether he would sack Rayner if she is found to have broken the ministerial code.<\/p>\n Asked about the prime minister\u2019s answers to the BBC on Thursday, Alexander told BBC Breakfast:<\/p>\n I thought if you look at how that interview has been reported in the papers this morning, you get radically different accounts as to what the prime minister was actually saying.<\/p>\n My sense is the prime minister was just being very careful.<\/p>\n He is, of course, a trained lawyer, as well as the prime minister, in not wanting to pre-judge a process that is now under way, but he was equally clear that he is ready to act on the basis of the information that he receives from Sir Laurie Magnus.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Share<\/a>Rayner’s political future uncertain as ministerial rules breach verdict expected on Friday<\/p>\n Angela Rayner<\/strong>\u2019s political future appeared increasingly uncertain ahead of the expected Friday verdict on whether she broke ministerial standards rules over her tax affairs. It comes as lawyers she said she used for her flat purchase denied having given her tax advice<\/a>.<\/p>\n Keir Starmer<\/strong> has repeatedly declined to say whether he would sack his deputy, who is also the housing secretary, if his independent ethics watchdog rules against her. The prime minister said he would \u201cof course\u201d act on the findings of Sir Laurie Magnus<\/strong>\u2019s probe after Rayner\u2019s acknowledgment that she failed to pay a \u00a340,000 stamp duty surcharge on a flat she bought in Hove<\/strong> this year.<\/p>\n Keir Starmer has repeatedly declined to say whether he would sack his deputy if his independent ethics watchdog rules against her. Photograph: Adam Vaughan\/EPA<\/p>\n The advice she received is likely to form a key plank of Magnus\u2019s investigation, after Rayner said she was incorrectly advised that she did not need to pay the higher stamp duty rate reserved for second home purchases.<\/p>\n The independent ethics adviser will assess whether Rayner broke the ministerial rules, which place an \u201coverarching duty on ministers to comply with the law\u201d, \u201cbehave in a way that upholds the highest standards of propriety\u201d, and \u201cbe as open as possible\u201d with the public.<\/p>\n Starmer told the BBC he would \u201cact on whatever the report is that\u2019s put in front of me\u201d. The Labour<\/a> leader said it was for the independent adviser to establish the facts around the controversy, \u201cthen of course it does fall to me \u2013 I completely accept that \u2013 to make the decision based on what I see in that report\u201d.<\/p>\n Also today, the Reform UK party conference<\/strong> begins in Marston Green<\/strong>, West Midlands<\/strong>. Nigel Farage<\/strong> is scheduled to address the conference at 4.10pm<\/strong>. Elsewhere, Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch<\/strong> will visit north-west Essex<\/strong> later this morning.<\/p>\n Trade minister Douglas Alexander<\/strong> is on the morning round for government and deputy Conservative party chair Matt Vickers<\/strong> is on for the Tories. Reform\u2019s chairman, Zia Yusuf, <\/strong> is also on the morning media round today.<\/p>\n In other developments:<\/p>\n The president of Israel will travel to London next week for a controversially timed trip amid outcry from Labour MPs who have urged Starmer<\/a> not to meet with the visiting delegation. <\/strong>The arrival of Isaac Herzog is fraught with complication for ministers, with the UK government on the brink of recognising the state of Palestine at the UN general assembly.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Nadine Dorries has defected to Reform on the eve of its conference, saying the Conservative party \u201cis dead\u201d. <\/strong>The former Tory cabinet minister, a close ally of Boris Johnson when he was prime minister, served as culture secretary until 2022 before resigning a year later when blocked from getting a peerage.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n The Home Office has won a legal decision which means it can attempt to block a move by Palestine Action<\/a> to have its ban under terror laws overturned. <\/strong>The latest legal twist in the battle between the government and the protest group \u2013 now proscribed as a terror organisation \u2013 saw the court of appeal rule that Yvette Cooper<\/a> can challenge the decision to grant a judicial review of the organisation\u2019s proscription that was due to be heard in November.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Nigel Farage is using a private company to reduce his tax bill on his GB News media appearances and other outside employment in a television star-style arrangement that has in recent years become frowned on by major broadcasters. <\/strong>The Reform UK leader diverts money from his prime-time TV show into his company, which means that he paid only 25% corporation tax on profits, instead of 40% income tax, and could offset some expenses.<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n