\n
\n
![\"Oxford](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Untitled-design-1-e1749297433790.png\" "\\"Oxford")
<\/p>\nWestminster City Council is expected to hand over control of Oxford Street to the Greater London Authority (GLA) without the option of \u2018calling in\u2019 the decision for further scrutiny.<\/p>\n
The council has said in a paper it has limited powers to prevent the street being taken on by the GLA and that acting \u2018proactively\u2019 will enable it to have a greater say in the Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan \u2019s pedestrianisation plans.<\/p>\n
The recommended decision to approve the GLA\u2019s request without allowing for it to be called-in by councillors has however been branded \u2018scandalous\u2019 by a local association, which said it expects the opposition Tory group to pursue a Judicial Review.<\/p>\n
Westminster City Council was approached but declined to comment.<\/p>\n
Last autumn the Mayor announced plans to pedestrianise Oxford Street in a bid to revitalise the iconic shopping district.<\/p>\n
The proposal has received support, with a recent consultation finding seven in 10 respondents backed the Mayor\u2019s plans to \u2018regenerate\u2019 Oxford Street. Two-thirds specifically supported pedestrianisation.<\/p>\n
Concerns have however also been raised by a range of interested parties, including Westminster City Council\u2019s Labour administration.<\/p>\n
Upon the announcement of the Mayor\u2019s plans last year, the council asked a series of questions including how any pedestrianisation scheme could be implemented without increasing congestion and how it will protect access for older people.<\/p>\n
The council also publicly noted its concern that it had only been told about the proposal days before the news was made public.<\/p>\n
Since then the Mayor has announced a car-free event on Oxford Street on September 21, seen as a mini test-run of the wider project.<\/p>\n
Concerns were again aired about the Mayor\u2019s engagement with the local council, with it being claimed Westminster was given just an hour\u2019s notice of the press release announcing the event.<\/p>\n
A spokesperson for the Mayor\u2019s Office described the allegations as \u201ccompletely untrue\u201d, adding they have been working closely with the council on the event and are in \u201cconstant communication\u201d regarding wider pedestrianisation plans.<\/p>\n
\u2018Abdication of responsibility and accountability\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n
The LDRS has been told that the Deputy Mayor for Planning, Regeneration and the Fire Service, Jules Pipe, allegedly informed attendees at two public meetings yesterday (September 9) that the Mayor of London was to take control of Oxford Street.<\/p>\n
The LDRS has been able to speak to someone connected to one of the events who said they also understood this to be the case.<\/p>\n
The Deputy Mayor\u2019s alleged comments came ahead of Westminster City Council putting out any of its own communications or publishing its report detailing the recommended decision.<\/p>\n
Since then the council\u2019s report has been uploaded, which recommends Cllr Max Sullivan, Cabinet Member for Streets, approve the GLA\u2019s request.<\/p>\n
The report states: \u201cBy agreeing to do this proactively, rather than refusing and waiting for the decision to be made by the Secretary of State, WCC will significantly improve our ability to influence what happens to Oxford Street and how. WCC will work pragmatically and constructively with the GLA to ensure the future success of Oxford Street and represent the interests of residents and businesses.<\/p>\n
\u201cUnder section 14B(5) of the Highways Act 1980, the GLA has the option to seek Secretary of State approval, if WCC refused to give consent. This means that WCC\u2019s power to refuse the GLA request would only be meaningful if the Secretary of State were to support such a refusal, which seems unlikely here, given the support for the project indicated by the Government.\u201d<\/p>\n
It is proposed that the GLA take control of Oxford Street from Marble Arch at its western end through to the junction with Tottenham Court Road, plus short stretches of certain side roads.<\/p>\n
A number of changes have been made following engagement with the council, including that Westminster will be able to retain development funds collected in the area. The council will have three seats on the board of the Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC), which is to be established to manage the scheme.<\/p>\n
The proposal has also been determined not to be a key decision due to it having \u201cno significant financial implications and nor will it be significant in terms of its effects on communities living or working in two or more wards\u201d. This means councillors cannot call it in to allow for further scrutiny to take place.<\/p>\n
Michael Bolt, spokesman for The Marylebone Association, described the decision not to designate the request a key decision as \u2018outrageous\u2019.<\/p>\n
\u201cFor Cllr Sullivan and Westminster City Council officers to classify this decision as \u201cNon-Key\u201d is scandalous, as it prevents the decision from being \u2018called in\u2019 for scrutiny,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe claim that the decision would not be \u201csignificant in terms of its effect on communities living or working in two or more wards\u201d is manifestly untrue. This misclassification opens the entire process to the risk of Judicial Review, which I fully expect the Conservative group to pursue.<\/p>\n
\u201cFurthermore, the decision paper\u2019s assertion that there is no need to consider the impact on climate change or equalities (such as accessibility to the kerbside), and that such matters are for TfL (Transport for London) alone, represents a complete abdication of responsibility and accountability.\u201d<\/p>\n
Tim Lord, Chair of the Soho Society, said: \u201cIt\u2019s disappointing to see more public money being spent while questions from the local community about the proposed removal of buses and taxis from Oxford Street remain unanswered.\u201d<\/p>\n
He added such questions include whether traffic congestion will be increased as a result of the pedestrianisation, whether bus and taxi journey times will be affected, and what the impact will be on people with limited mobility who rely on public transport.<\/p>\n
\u201cTo which we might now add a further question \u2013 what will the MDC use its proposed new powers over building development for?<\/p>\n
\u201cThese questions should have been addressed first, not kicked down the road, while TfL takes legal powers without an explanation as to what it is actually going to do with them.\u201d<\/p>\n
Conservative councillor Tim Barnes, representing the local West End ward, said: \u201cThe Mayor is trying to get his hands on Oxford Street by working around the rules and processes. Westminster City Council has rolled over for the sake of party politics and is denying residents and businesses the chance for them to have their say in full. It\u2019s all part of a pattern of behaviour by the Mayor, who is looking for every opportunity to take short cuts and ignore those who can see the problems with his hair-brained schemes.<\/p>\n
\u201cThis time, he\u2019s sent his Deputy out to announce something that has not even been through the legally required processes at Westminster City Council. It\u2019s an insult to the council and our residents.\u201d<\/p>\n
A spokesperson for the Mayor of London said: \u201cThe Mayor is delighted that Westminster City Council has started the process to hand over control of Oxford Street. This is a significant step forward on the Mayor\u2019s pledge to pedestrianise the road and unlock Oxford Street\u2019s true potential to deliver a world-class, accessible, clean street for everyone. A final formal decision by the Mayor will be made in due course.\u201d<\/p>\n
\ud83d\udce9
\n
\n <\/p>\n
Get the latest breaking news, roadworks, crime updates and local events straight to your inbox \u2013 totally free, every day.<\/p>\n
SIGN UP below<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Westminster City Council is expected to hand over control of Oxford Street to the Greater London Authority (GLA)…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":414933,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7757],"tags":[748,393,4884,7833,257,7834,12,27050,18074,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-414932","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-london","8":"tag-britain","9":"tag-england","10":"tag-great-britain","11":"tag-harrow-online","12":"tag-london","13":"tag-london-news","14":"tag-news","15":"tag-news-in-london","16":"tag-oxford-street","17":"tag-uk","18":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115183855115280256","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=414932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/414932\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/414933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=414932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=414932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=414932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}