{"id":46863,"date":"2025-04-24T14:52:15","date_gmt":"2025-04-24T14:52:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/46863\/"},"modified":"2025-04-24T14:52:15","modified_gmt":"2025-04-24T14:52:15","slug":"german-greens-push-to-abolish-neutrality-act-allowing-headscarves-for-civil-servants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/46863\/","title":{"rendered":"German Greens push to abolish neutrality act, allowing headscarves for civil servants"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"c-ad__placeholder__logo\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/logo-euronews-grey-6-180x22.svg.svg+xml\" width=\"180\" height=\"22\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\"\/>ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n<p>The Greens party&#8217;s group in the Berlin House of Representatives has made a motion calling for the abolition of the so-called Neutrality Act, a law that prohibits civil servants from visibly wearing or displaying religious symbols while at work.<\/p>\n<p>The 2005 law, which affects teachers, police and judicial officers, among others, has already been brought to court several times. <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/icon-cross-10x10-grey-6.svg.svg+xml\" width=\"10\" height=\"10\" alt=\"Close advertising\" fetchpriority=\"high\" loading=\"lazy\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Since then, there have been further complaints, particularly in connection with the wearing of headscarves by Muslim civil servants. The law also bans Jewish men from wearing a yarmulka, yet allows the wearing of crucifixes.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters of the law, however, argue that the act does not target a particular group and is solely concerned with separating public office from religion or ideology and keeping it secular. <\/p>\n<p>However, the Berlin Greens parliamentary group says that the neutrality law &#8220;hinders the access of women who have chosen to wear a headscarf to professions in the public service, and in some cases, makes this impossible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Highly qualified women are not allowed to practise their profession because they wear a headscarf. That is a problem,&#8221; Green Party politician Tuba Bozkurt told Tagesspiegel newspaper, calling it a &#8220;de facto professional ban&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The Greens believe their initiative would enable women to work as civil servants in the administration of justice, the prison system and the police, even if they wear a headscarf.<\/p>\n<p>The centre-right CDU and centre-left SPD parties, which have agreed on a ruling coalition after the federal elections in February, are not expected to want to change the existing law.<\/p>\n<p>The current coalition agreement, which still needs to be agreed upon by the two parties, states the Neutrality Act is to be reworked &#8220;in a court-proof manner to reflect the current case law of the Federal Constitutional Court.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>How did the Neutrality Act come to be?<\/p>\n<p>In 2015, the German Federal Constitutional Court issued a landmark judgment, ruling that a general ban on headscarves would not be compatible with the constitution, as it would disproportionately restrict fundamental rights. <\/p>\n<p>The ruling further stated that such a ban could be justified only if a headscarf posed a threat to school peace or state neutrality.<\/p>\n<p>The Berlin education administration only relented in 2023, years after the judgment. Previously, the state authorities had to pay compensation to a teacher of Muslim faith in 2018 because she was not hired due to her wearing a headscarf. <\/p>\n<p>The teacher received around \u20ac5,200 in compensation under the General Equal Treatment Act due to what the labour court deemed to be religious discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, the Berlin Senate Administration issued a letter to all schools stating that, in the future, it would cease the &#8220;literal application of the Neutrality Act&#8221; and follow the Federal Constitutional Court&#8217;s ruling. However, what constitutes a threat to school peace remains undefined.<\/p>\n<p>The Neutrality Act is based on another Federal Constitutional Court ruling in 2003, when Fereshta Ludin brought the case to court, stating she wanted to work as a teacher in Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg after completing her studies, but was prohibited from practising her profession because of her headscarf.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"c-ad__placeholder__logo\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/logo-euronews-grey-6-180x22.svg.svg+xml\" width=\"180\" height=\"22\" alt=\"\" loading=\"lazy\"\/>ADVERTISEMENT<\/p>\n<p>The Federal Constitutional Court ruled that the decision of the competent authority and the rulings of the lower courts violated the teacher&#8217;s fundamental rights \u2014 in particular her freedom of religion and the right to equal access to public office.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the court found that there was no legal basis for such a ban in Baden-W\u00fcrttemberg at the time. However, the court confirmed that wearing a headscarf could come into conflict with state neutrality. <\/p>\n<p>According to German law, it is up to the individual federal states to decide whether teachers are allowed to wear a headscarf in schools. As a result, Berlin and seven other federal states introduced the Neutrality Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"ADVERTISEMENT The Greens party&#8217;s group in the Berlin House of Representatives has made a motion calling for the&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":46864,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5310],"tags":[2000,299,1824,13593,25724,8547],"class_list":{"0":"post-46863","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-germany","8":"tag-eu","9":"tag-europe","10":"tag-germany","11":"tag-greens","12":"tag-hijab","13":"tag-religion"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114393510435621499","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46863","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46863"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46863\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/46864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46863"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46863"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46863"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}