{"id":478877,"date":"2025-10-06T20:37:23","date_gmt":"2025-10-06T20:37:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/478877\/"},"modified":"2025-10-06T20:37:23","modified_gmt":"2025-10-06T20:37:23","slug":"red-bull-explains-why-developing-current-f1-car-is-important-even-if-it-hits-2026-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/478877\/","title":{"rendered":"Red Bull explains why developing current F1 car is important even if it hits 2026 project"},"content":{"rendered":"

In contrast with the majority of the Formula 1 grid, Red Bull<\/a>\u00a0continued to introduce notable upgrades to its RB21 \u2013 with Max Verstappen<\/a>\u00a0stating a new floor rolled out in Monza \u201cdefinitely helped\u201d, even though most of the recent progress is down to improved execution. However, the short-term gains could impact Red Bull\u2019s long-term ambitions with its 2026 project. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Chief engineer Paul Monaghan explained that Red Bull had found just enough capacity \u201cto squeeze in\u201d the Monza floor upgrade, which was followed in Singapore by a new front wing, without compromising its 2026 development too much. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Although the new parts weren\u2019t the main factor behind Red Bull\u2019s recent upswing in form, they certainly helped, and now the team must balance chasing performance in 2025 with setting itself on the right path for F1\u2019s new regulations coming next year. \u00a0<\/p>\n

After the Singapore Grand Prix, team boss Laurent Mekies acknowledged that extending the development of the RB21 could impact Red Bull\u2019s 2026 efforts – especially given the constraints of the cost cap and the sliding scale aero testing system – but he stressed it\u2019s the right path to take.<\/p>\n

\u201cCertainly, from a Red Bull Racing perspective, even without looking at the other guys around, I think it was [right],\u201d Mekies explained after the Singapore GP. \u201cIt is very important that we get to understand if the project has more performance. \u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s important that we get to the bottom of it, because we will judge, and we will elaborate next year’s project with the same tools and with the same methodology, even if the regulations are completely different.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Laurent <\/p>\n

Laurent Mekies, Red Bull Racing Team Principal<\/p>\n

Photo by: Sam Bloxham \/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

For Mekies, the first step is therefore ensuring those tools and methods can be fully trusted. The best way to check that is by validating them with the current car, rather than blindly relying on them heading into 2026.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cIt’s very important that we validate with this year’s car that our way of looking at the data is correct, and that our way of developing the car is correct. If we can produce that level of performance, then that will give us confidence in the winter for next year’s car.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

According to Mekies, it\u2019s a strategic choice made behind the scenes at Red Bull.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cOf course it comes at a cost, undoubtedly, to the \u201826 project,\u201d he adds. \u201cBut, we feel it’s the right trade-off for us without judging what the other guys are doing.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Mekies counterpart at McLaren<\/a>, Andrea Stella, suggested that Red Bull\u2019s extended RB21 development – along with Mercedes\u2019<\/a>\u00a0– is one reason that the team’s advantage has recently narrowed.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cI think there’s a trend,\u201d Stella said. \u201cWe have stopped the development of the car now for quite some time, because we’ve been focusing entirely on 2026. There were, if anything, little parts that we took to Monza, but otherwise we were just focusing on 2026 for a long time. While we have seen that some competitors kept taking trackside some new upgrades. Red Bull is certainly one of those.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Lando <\/p>\n

Lando Norris, McLaren, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing<\/p>\n

Photo by: Sam Bloxham \/ LAT Images via Getty Images<\/p>\n

For both McLaren and Red Bull, however, their respective approaches make sense given their differing circumstances. McLaren enjoyed the luxury of having the constructors\u2019 championship – still the most valuable title for teams, in terms of prize money and bonuses for personnel – well under control for a long time. With that buffer, it was logical to shift focus early on to the major regulation changes for 2026, particularly since its correlation between the virtual and on-track world is already strong.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Red Bull, by contrast, found itself in a completely different situation when Mekies took over. For about 18 months, the Milton Keynes-based team was effectively \u201clooking at different watches,\u201d as former team boss Christian Horner described it \u2013 meaning its simulation tools (wind tunnel and simulator) were showing different results from what was happening on track<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In that context, it was vital for Mekies and the team to understand those discrepancies first, since failing to do so would represent a major risk heading into 2026 – especially as developing the new car depends even more on the virtual world than ever before.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The current car serves as a benchmark to validate the tools, making it logical that Red Bull has continued working on it for longer to ensure its foundation and understanding are at least solid. That approach might cost the team time and resources for the 2026 project, but it\u2019s still preferable compared to entering an all-new regulation era \u201cblind\u201d and risking another fundamental error.<\/p>\n

Read Also:<\/p>\n

We want to hear from you!<\/p>\n

Let us know what you would like to see from us in the future.<\/p>\n

Take our survey<\/a><\/p>\n

– The Autosport.com Team<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In contrast with the majority of the Formula 1 grid, Red Bull\u00a0continued to introduce notable upgrades to its…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":478878,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4103],"tags":[4199,707,4200,130090,158996,749,130103,79,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-478877","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-f1","8":"tag-f1","9":"tag-formula-1","10":"tag-formula1","11":"tag-marina-bay-street-circuit","12":"tag-red-bull-explains-why-developing-current-f1-car-is-important-even-if-it-hits-2026-project","13":"tag-red-bull-racing","14":"tag-singapore-gp","15":"tag-sports","16":"tag-uk","17":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115329148709287285","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/478877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=478877"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/478877\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/478878"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=478877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=478877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=478877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}