{"id":484443,"date":"2025-10-09T01:52:17","date_gmt":"2025-10-09T01:52:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/484443\/"},"modified":"2025-10-09T01:52:17","modified_gmt":"2025-10-09T01:52:17","slug":"david-lammy-rules-out-charging-workers-for-employment-tribunal-claims-employment-tribunals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/484443\/","title":{"rendered":"David Lammy rules out charging workers for employment tribunal claims | Employment tribunals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The justice secretary, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/david-lammy\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">David Lammy<\/a>, has ruled out reintroducing charges for employment tribunals after a backlash from unions over the proposals.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The Guardian revealed last week that ministers were considering <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/money\/2025\/oct\/01\/labour-considering-charging-workers-for-employment-tribunal-claims-sources-say\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">a plan to charge workers a fee to take their bosses to court<\/a> as part of negotiations in this year\u2019s spending review. Trade unions responded with fury, labelling the idea a \u201cdisaster\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The Ministry of Justice declined to rule out implementing the proposal last week, saying only that \u201cdecision-making about the department\u2019s spending and fees for the next few years following this summer\u2019s spending review is ongoing\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">But in a statement on Wednesday, Lammy, who is also deputy prime minister, said: \u201cIt\u2019s a fundamental principle that everyone, no matter their income, should be able to get access to justice to challenge unfair behaviour at work.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">\u201cIt\u2019s not just a basic right, it\u2019s also fundamental to this government\u2019s plan to make work pay. That\u2019s why it will remain free to bring a case to an employment tribunal, ensuring everyone, no matter their means, can stand up for their rights at work.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Making a claim against an employer had been free since the tribunal system was established in the 1960s, until David Cameron\u2019s coalition government introduced charges in 2013. Fees were then scrapped in 2017, after the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/money\/2017\/jul\/26\/union-supreme-court-fees-unfair-dismissal-claims\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">supreme court ruled they were unlawful<\/a>, after a case brought by the Unison trade union.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Lammy added: \u201cThe Tory-Lib Dem coalition government tried to price workers out of justice with tribunal fees. Let me be clear, we will not.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Paul Nowak, secretary general of the TUC, welcomed Lammy\u2019s announcement, saying: \u201cNo one should ever be priced out of enforcing their rights at work.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">He added: \u201cThe Conservatives left the tribunal system and our courts in a mess with huge backlogs. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/politics\/tradeunions\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trade unions<\/a> are ready to work with the deputy prime minister and other ministers to deliver a system that is fair, accessible and fit for the future. This includes unions helping workers resolve problems in the workplace, not the courts.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">Labour\u2019s employment rights bill includes sweeping changes to workers\u2019 rights, which the unions have welcomed, but some business lobby groups have argued will add to the costs of hiring workers. The changes are expected to lead to an increase in tribunal cases.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">The Conservatives, under the leadership of the then prime minister Rishi Sunak, proposed a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/consultations\/introducing-fees-in-the-employment-tribunals-and-the-employment-appeal-tribunal\/introducing-fees-in-the-employment-tribunals-and-the-employment-appeal-tribunal\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u00a355 fee for workers to make an employment tribunal claim<\/a>, in plans made void by Keir Starmer\u2019s general election victory.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">With significant delays and a shortage of qualified judges, the UK\u2019s employment tribunal backlog has ballooned, with a queue of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/statistics\/tribunals-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2025\/tribunal-statistics-quarterly-january-to-march-2025\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">45,000 single open cases<\/a> at the end of March.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-130mj7b\">In order to help tackle the backlog, the Ministry of Justice began recruitment for up to 36 employment tribunal judges in March, and it plans to hire another 50 next year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The justice secretary, David Lammy, has ruled out reintroducing charges for employment tribunals after a backlash from unions&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":484444,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3092],"tags":[51,897,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-484443","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-jobs","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-jobs","10":"tag-uk","11":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115341711423438375","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=484443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/484443\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/484444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=484443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=484443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=484443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}