{"id":541928,"date":"2025-11-01T11:32:16","date_gmt":"2025-11-01T11:32:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/541928\/"},"modified":"2025-11-01T11:32:16","modified_gmt":"2025-11-01T11:32:16","slug":"how-furious-william-and-workaholic-charles-delivered-final-blow-to-andrews-royal-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/541928\/","title":{"rendered":"How ‘furious’ William and workaholic Charles delivered final blow to Andrew’s royal life"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n\t\t\t\t\tPalace officials have insisted publicly that the family, including William, all support the King\u2019s leadership on the crisis\t\t\t\t\t <\/p>\n

The King\u2019s decision to strip his brother Andrew of his royal titles and home<\/a> has sparked tension in rival camps over whether Prince William<\/a> was really the driving force behind it<\/a>.<\/p>\n

One former senior royal aide said: \u201cKnowing William, I can imagine he can\u2019t stand to be in the same company as Andrew\u2026 It\u2019s a lot easier to be hard on your uncle than it is on your brother.\u201d<\/p>\n

Palace<\/a> officials have insisted publicly that the family, including William, all support the King\u2019s leadership on the Andrew crisis. They stress that it was the 76-year-old monarch, not his heir, who made the final call after consulting the wider family.<\/p>\n

New FeatureIn ShortQuick Stories. Same trusted journalism.<\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Reform
\n\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\"Sign
\n\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/p>\n

But other insiders suggest that Prince William is an increasingly influential force, who was deeply unhappy that Andrew had been allowed to cling on to his remaining royal privileges.<\/p>\n

William, 43, is said to be frustrated that action is only now being taken against his uncle, three years into his father\u2019s reign.<\/p>\n

William looked \u2018furious\u2019 with Andrew<\/p>\n

\u201cI can\u2019t help thinking back to when William was pictured outside the Duchess of Kent\u2019s funeral [in September],\u201d said royal commentator Victoria Murphy, \u201cwhen Andrew was talking to him and, in contrast to the King, how obviously furious he looked.\u201d<\/p>\n

Those pictures at the funeral, along with leaks to certain media, helped forge the impression William was the one pushing his father to be tougher. Catherine Mayer,<\/strong> a leading biographer of Charles, has heard supporters of the King and William each claim credit for Andrew\u2019s final humiliation.<\/p>\n

\"LONDON,William was pictured alongside his uncle at the Duchess of Kent\u2019s funeral in September (Photo: Wiktor Szymanowicz\/Future Publishing via Getty)<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen the institution is under pressure it doesn\u2019t always play the same tune,\u201d she said. \u201cAt this point, all it does is highlight how overdue this is.\u201d<\/p>\n

Describing the current situation as \u201ccrisis management\u201d, Mayer said the institution had allowed the scandal to fester. For too long, she added, <\/strong>there had been too little thought for Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s<\/a> victims. <\/p>\n

\u201cThis is a genuinely shameful situation that has been allowed to continue, not just in recent years, but for a very long time.\u201d <\/p>\n

\u2018It never sat easy with Charles\u2019<\/p>\n

Friends of the monarch dispute the narrative this is all about William, insisting that if Charles had got his way Andrew would have been forced into relative exile years before. But his mother, they say, indulged Andrew and was often easily influenced by him.<\/p>\n

One senior royal source said: \u201cThis has never sat easy with [Charles]\u2026 He has had to pick up the pieces. He would never want to disrespect his dear mama\u2026 but those are the facts.\u201d<\/p>\n

But behind the scenes some sources have given the impression that William was unhappy with his father\u2019s initial decision to persuade Andrew to stop using his duke of York title and honours.<\/p>\n

\u201cWilliam was unhappy but so was Charles,\u201d the source said, adding that there was shared recognition of the need to spend time these past weeks consulting legal and constitutional experts on the best way forward.<\/p>\n

Queen Camilla\u2019s role<\/p>\n

Others have a slightly different perspective. Robert Jobson, who has written biographies of both William and Charles, noted that the statement issued by Buckingham Palace on Thursday evening contained a reference to Queen Camilla<\/a>, who like her sister-in-law Sophie, the Duchess of Edinburgh, has championed the victims of domestic abuse and sexual violence<\/a>. <\/p>\n

\u201cI thought it was interesting that the statement came from the King and Queen, given the Queen\u2019s work on domestic abuse and sexual violence,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

But he also detected the hand of William and the tectonic plates shifting. \u201cAt the moment, there is a shift with the future of the monarchy<\/a> in view. The King has cancer<\/a> and William must be saying, \u2018I want this matter resolved. I don\u2019t want this matter to come up on my watch\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"ThisKing Charles recently travelled to the Vatican to meet Pope Leo XIV. The two made history when they\u00a0prayed together in the Sistine Chapel (Photo: Vatican Media\/AFP)<\/p>\n

Palace officials have said the King\u2019s cancer is a managed condition and his treatment is moving in a positive direction. <\/p>\n

\u2018The Palace has got it right\u2019<\/p>\n

The tipping point for the Royal Family<\/a>, according to several sources, was an email published three weeks ago that seemed to contradict what Andrew had said in his 2019 BBC Newsnight interview<\/a> about cutting off his friendship with Epstein after visiting him in New York in 2010. <\/p>\n

The email showed that in February 2011 he had told Epstein to keep in touch and added: \u201cWe\u2019ll play some more soon.\u201d<\/p>\n

This coupled with further allegations that Andrew had asked his Scotland Yard protection officer to dig up dirt on Virginia Giuffre<\/a>, the woman who said she was trafficked to have sex with him when she was 17 \u2013 an allegation the former duke strongly denies.<\/p>\n

The publication of Giuffre\u2019s posthumous memoir<\/a> only added to the sense inside the Palace that it was time to act.<\/p>\n

Lauren Beeching, a crisis PR expert, said the royals had for too long clung to the late Queen\u2019s mantra of never complain, never explain. But she praised the King\u2019s decisive action this week, which means the former prince will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. <\/p>\n

\u201cI think they\u2019ve got it right and, for once, the Palace is ahead of the polls and headlines,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

\t\tYour next read<\/p>\n


\n\t\t\t\"Article <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Palace officials have insisted publicly that the family, including William, all support the King\u2019s leadership on the crisis…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":541929,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3937],"tags":[77,518,2205,532,519,382,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-541928","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-tv","8":"tag-entertainment","9":"tag-king-charles-iii","10":"tag-prince-andrew","11":"tag-prince-william","12":"tag-royal-family","13":"tag-tv","14":"tag-uk","15":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115474226141286392","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=541928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/541928\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/541929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=541928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=541928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=541928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}