{"id":55022,"date":"2025-04-27T15:02:11","date_gmt":"2025-04-27T15:02:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/55022\/"},"modified":"2025-04-27T15:02:11","modified_gmt":"2025-04-27T15:02:11","slug":"excessive-battersea-riverside-tower-block-plans-rejected-by-councillors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/55022\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Excessive&#8217; Battersea riverside tower block plans rejected by councillors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/newsletter_hnp_embed_desktop.png\" alt=\"Homes &amp; Property\" width=\"158px\" height=\"158px\" class=\"sc-eEbqID ecGikU\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Plans for a controversial high-rise development on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.standard.co.uk\/topic\/battersea\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Battersea<\/a>\u2019s riverfront have been rejected by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.standard.co.uk\/topic\/wandsworth\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Wandsworth<\/a> council, which will come as a relief to residents who have campaigned against the development and argued that it will \u201ctower over\u201d their homes.<\/p>\n<p>The Glassmill development, backed by developer Rockwell, includes 110 homes, of which half will be for social rent. The scheme includes a taller element housing private flats and a \u201cshoulder tower\u201d of ten storeys, which would contain 54 social homes, affordable workspace and a free-to-access community space.<\/p>\n<p>It was recommended for refusal by planning officers due to its \u201cexcessive height and scale\u201d. The 127-page report argued that it would \u201crepresent an unacceptable and incongruous transformative change within the location that would significant harm the spatial character\u201d. <\/p>\n<p>After hearing the planning officers\u2019 report and recommendation, councillors at Thursday\u2019s planning committee meeting voted unanimously to turn down the plans. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s not just too big, it\u2019s not just too tall. It\u2019s so enormous that it\u2019s almost a joke. I can hardly believe it\u2019s a serious application,\u201d said Fiona Ayers, Labour councillor for East Putney. <\/p>\n<p>Simon Hogg, leader of the council, commented: \u201cThe committee is responsible for the scrutiny of applications and considers the merits of an application on paper as well as the voices of residents. The committee were unanimous about the harms of a 29-storey tower in this location, in breach of Wandsworth\u2019s Local Plan which sets out acceptable heights for the area.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For residents, this decision comes as welcome news. \u201cThe committee meeting was full of damning statements from councillors about Rockwell&#8217;s plan and they laid bare all the problems that it would have caused. I hope that the company now scraps the scheme altogether and that they do not appeal. This was the wrong scheme, in the wrong area, and they took on the wrong community,\u201d said resident and editor of <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/thechelseacitizen.com\/\">The Chelsea Citizen<\/a> Rob McGibbon, who has campaigned against the development.<\/p>\n<p>McGibbon launched a petition under the banner <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.change.org%2Fp%2Fs-o-b-b-stop-one-battersea-bridge&amp;data=05%7C02%7Cprudence.ivey%40standard.co.uk%7Cf270ce88fa284f7ef1c208dd825a89b7%7C0f3a4c644dc54a768d4152d85ca158a5%7C0%7C0%7C638810048017038707%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=qnkbn0KGbggNUxH1Cb8VSdQ%2FEjxepa7h2Z3ydRo58Q0%3D&amp;reserved=0\">STOP One Battersea Bridge<\/a> (S.O.B.B), which has amassed nearly 5,000 signatures, including from stars such as Mick Jagger, the Rolling Stones frontman who has a long association with Chelsea.<\/p>\n<p>According to McGibbon, other famous names have also lent their weight to the campaign, including iconic guitarist Eric Clapton and the actress Felicity Kendal.<\/p>\n<p>More than 1900 objections have been submitted to the council, with opposition also raised by a roll call of groups including Historic England, the Chelsea Society, the Battersea Society and the neighbouring borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Wandsworth <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com\/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.architectsjournal.co.uk%2Fnews%2Ffarrells-cuts-back-planned-battersea-housing-tower-but-opposition-mounts%23%3A~%3Atext%3DThe%2520planned%2520tower%2520has%2520also%2Ctall%2520buildings%2520are%2520not%2520supported%27.&amp;data=05%7C02%7Cprudence.ivey%40standard.co.uk%7Cf270ce88fa284f7ef1c208dd825a89b7%7C0f3a4c644dc54a768d4152d85ca158a5%7C0%7C0%7C638810048017071160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=8I9xZ%2F0qQEiGqAVxOMrELevSKWLusstKuMXtwDp%2B%2BoQ%3D&amp;reserved=0\">Council Leader Simon Hogg<\/a> and local MP Marsha de Cordova have also spoken out against the scheme.<\/p>\n<p>Over 1,500 comments have also been submitted in support of the scheme, and in response to concerns the tower\u2019s architect has already slashed ten storeys off its height.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis was the Donald Trump of planning applications &#8211; it made no sense on any level! It was woefully ill-informed, insensitive, and driven by brazen avarice,\u201d said McGibbon. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cJust because an architect\u2019s computer software says that a tower can be built on a piece of land, it does not make it sensible, viable or morally right. My sincere thanks goes to everyone who supported my campaign.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u2018The wrong call\u2019, says Rockwell<\/p>\n<p>Rockwell, on the other hand, takes a different view. The developers argue that the existing site is in need of regeneration, and emphasise the need for more homes to be built in order to meet the Labour party\u2019s housing targets.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWandsworth Council has made the wrong call, one that shuts the door on urgently needed homes,\u201d said Nicholas Mee, Rockwell\u2019s managing director.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s blocked 110 new properties, half at social rent, far exceeding the borough\u2019s own affordable housing targets. Meanwhile, 11,000 people in Wandsworth are still waiting for a secure place to live. Across London, 80,000 children don\u2019t have a permanent home.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In Thursday\u2019s meeting, councillors raised concerns around the viability of delivering 50 per cent affordable homes. Rockwell says there is \u201cabsolutely no reasonable basis to this claim\u201d, and adds that as developers they are legally bound to the affordable housing requirements in their planning permission.<\/p>\n<p>Addressing comments about the height of the building, Rockwell said that the site was an area designated for tall buildings until 2021 and claimed that currently, the council\u2019s policies do not \u201coutright prohibit\u201d tall buildings in the area.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis scheme still has the potential to change things for the better,\u201d added Mee. \u201cMore than 1,800 residents and 100 local businesses backed it. They know what this means: fewer families in temporary accommodation. A stronger local economy. A fairer borough.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Spring Statement made it clear: housebuilding is a national priority and a route to growth. Wandsworth hasn\u2019t just turned its back on the Labour Government &#8211; it\u2019s turned its back on the people who need help the most.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Plans for a controversial high-rise development on Battersea\u2019s riverfront have been rejected by Wandsworth council, which will come&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":55023,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7757],"tags":[29221,748,12495,393,4884,257,2516,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-55022","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-london","8":"tag-battersea","9":"tag-britain","10":"tag-development","11":"tag-england","12":"tag-great-britain","13":"tag-london","14":"tag-property","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114410536716971020","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55022\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55023"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}