![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Broomfield-South-SILC-Google.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\t\t<\/p>\n
The council has been accused of a \u201craid\u201d on education funds to help pay for a south Leeds school expansion.<\/p>\n
Around \u00a32.2m put towards an upgrade of Broomfield South SILC school in Belle Isle includes cash first intended for school improvements elsewhere, it is claimed.<\/p>\n
An extra\u00a0100 places for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) will be added to the school in the Middletown Park council ward.<\/p>\n
Expanding the Specialist Inclusive Learning Centre (SILC) is set to cost up to \u00a325m, part funded by cash contributions from housing developers.<\/p>\n
Stewart Golton, Leeds Liberal Democrat leader, said developer contributions were being diverted from other council wards, including almost \u00a3740,000 from his Rothwell ward. He said:<\/p>\n
\n\u201cIt is outrageous how officers have been allowed to raid funds that were dedicated to improving local education provision so that they can fill a hole in their investment programme elsewhere.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Figures obtained by Coun Golton show funds were also being drawn from housing developments in the Morley and Kippax and Methley wards.<\/p>\n
He said the developer cash was being used after a bid for government funding for the Broomfield project was rejected. Cllr Golton said:<\/p>\n
\n\u201cIt\u2019s not the fault of children in Rothwell and Morley that the council\u2019s bid to finance the rebuild of Broomfield was judged unworthy of funding, so why should they lose out because of it?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Developers make the financial contributions as part of Section 106 legal agreements with the council.<\/p>\n
Leeds City Council pointed out that children from all over south Leeds attend Broomfield school. Use of the Section 106 money would avoid the funds being lost under clawback deadlines agreed with the developers. A spokesperson said:<\/p>\n
\n\u201cThe use of Section 106 education contributions for this project was decided after due process.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The Broomfield scheme was launched to help address a rise in the number of children needing specialist school places. A post-16 satellite learning centre has already opened at White Rose Park.<\/p>\n
The spokesperson added:<\/p>\n
\n\u201cAlthough we have created more than 450 specialist learning places across the city since 2020, we continue to respond to the need for additional specialist provision, growing our provision where necessary.<\/p>\n
\u201cBroomfield SILC serves children from across south Leeds, beyond its own ward, so additional specialist provision depends on Section 106 contributions from wards in\u00a0the south of the city.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
The new school places at Broomfield SILC are set to be available from September 2027.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
This post was written by Dom Mort<\/strong>, Local Democracy Reporter<\/p>\n
Photo: Google<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
While you\u2019re here, can we ask a favour?<\/strong><\/p>\n
South Leeds Life is published by a not-for-profit social enterprise. We keep our costs as low as possible but we\u2019ve been hit by increases in the print costs for our monthly newspaper which have doubled in the last two years.<\/p>\n
Could you help support local community news by making a one off donation, or even better taking out a supporters subscription?<\/p>\n