{"id":551745,"date":"2025-11-06T00:02:16","date_gmt":"2025-11-06T00:02:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/551745\/"},"modified":"2025-11-06T00:02:16","modified_gmt":"2025-11-06T00:02:16","slug":"brexit-and-austerity-still-causing-major-problems-for-economy-phillipson-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/551745\/","title":{"rendered":"Brexit and austerity still causing \u2018major problems\u2019 for economy \u2013 Phillipson"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The chaos of Brexit and years of austerity are to blame for the tax rises Rachel Reeves is expected to announce at the Budget, a Cabinet minister said.<\/p>\n<p>Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson insisted the Government takes its manifesto commitments seriously despite expectations at Westminster that the Chancellor will rip up the promises made to voters over tax hikes.<\/p>\n<p>The National Institute of Economic and Social Research, a major economic think tank, said the Chancellor must plug a \u00a350 billion black hole in the nation\u2019s public finances and give herself a larger fiscal headroom.<\/p>\n<p>It suggested a 2p rise in income tax was likely to be needed to address the hole, echoing a similar suggestion by the Resolution Foundation, another think tank which has been influential upon the Government\u2019s thinking.<\/p>\n<p>Ms Reeves would become the first chancellor in half a century to increase the basic rate of income tax if she follows that suggestion when she delivers her November 26 Budget.<\/p>\n<p>Speculation that she will take that step, which would mean ditching Labour\u2019s manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT, was heightened when she delivered a speech on Tuesday saying that \u201ceach of us must do our bit\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>An expected downgrade in forecasts of productivity from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) will add to Ms Reeves\u2019 headaches because it will suggest lower economic growth and tax receipts.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"525\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">\u26a1\ufe0fNEW ANALYSIS OUT NOW \u26a1\ufe0f<\/p>\n<p>Raising the rate of <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/incometax?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#incometax<\/a> would be the least economically damaging option available to the <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Chancellor?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#Chancellor<\/a> at this time<\/p>\n<p>Read more here \u2b07\ufe0f<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/Budget2025?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#Budget2025<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/ukeconomy?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#ukeconomy<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/FiscalPolicy?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">#FiscalPolicy<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/dCDVU9GTZH\">https:\/\/t.co\/dCDVU9GTZH<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 National Institute of Economic and Social Research (@NIESRorg) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/NIESRorg\/status\/1976571871043711133?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">October 10, 2025<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Ms Phillipson told the BBC: \u201cWhere it comes to our manifesto, of course, we take the commitments we made seriously.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd as the Chancellor was saying yesterday, we know that there are some big challenges in the economy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve made lots of changes already that are putting things on a more stable footing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s why we\u2019ve seen interest rate cuts, we\u2019ve seen growth being the fastest in the G7 in the first half of the year.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut there are some big global factors that remain a challenge, and that\u2019s why we will do what\u2019s right, what\u2019s necessary, both for the public but also for the long-term future of our economy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She added that the OBR\u00a0will show \u201cthe damage of the chaotic Brexit we saw, the damage of years and years of austerity was even more serious than we anticipated\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Ms Phillipson added: \u201cUnfortunately, that is causing major problems in terms of our economy and that\u2019s where we are at the moment, I\u2019m afraid to say.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Elsewhere, The Times reported some senior figures within the Government are unhappy with the Chancellor\u2019s plans.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBreaking the manifesto will mean we lose some voters forever,\u201d said an unnamed minister quoted in the newspaper.<\/p>\n<p>Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride meanwhile suggested his counterpart must stand down if she goes ahead with tax rises.<\/p>\n<p>The senior Tory said: \u201cThis is about choices. If Rachel Reeves breaks her word and raises taxes again, she must go.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA responsible chancellor would get a grip on spending \u2013 including the welfare bill \u2013 not reach for yet another tax rise.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the Chancellor insisted on LBC\u2019s Tonight With Andrew Marr that she would not take such a step.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd what do you think would happen in financial markets if I did that?\u201d she told the broadcaster.<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>ADVERTISEMENT &#8211; CONTINUE READING BELOW<\/p>\n<p>          <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The chaos of Brexit and years of austerity are to blame for the tax rises Rachel Reeves is&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":551746,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5226],"tags":[802,21996,748,1194,2000,299,5187,1699,4884,8414,176695,619,54037,176696,1200,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-551745","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-brexit","8":"tag-brexit","9":"tag-bridget-phillipson","10":"tag-britain","11":"tag-budget","12":"tag-eu","13":"tag-europe","14":"tag-european","15":"tag-european-union","16":"tag-great-britain","17":"tag-labour","18":"tag-national-institute-of-economic-and-social-research","19":"tag-rachel-reeves","20":"tag-resolution-foundation","21":"tag-sir-mel-stride","22":"tag-tax","23":"tag-uk","24":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115499823549629670","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/551745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=551745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/551745\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/551746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=551745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=551745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=551745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}