The U.K. has ambitious nuclear power plans and is developing several small- and large-scale projects. While opposition, high costs, and other factors have slowed development in the past, EDF has been facing another problem at its Hinkley Point C construction \u2013 a rat infestation.\u00a0<\/p>\n
In early April, the Unite and GMB trade unions for workers at Hinkley Point C in Somerset, in the south of England, informed the developer, French energy giant EDF, that the facility was overrun with rats. The unions said that immediate action was needed as the rodents were \u201ceverywhere\u201d and the rapidly expanding rat population prompted health and safety concerns for the workforce.\u00a0<\/p>\n
One source reported<\/a>, \u201cThey\u2019re all over. You see them just sat there, looking at you. It is worse near the canteens, where I guess it started. But they are everywhere now.\u201d Another source said, \u201cThe more men working on the site, the more rubbish on the site \u2013 and the canteens are not clean either. It has just become worse over time.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n The development of Hinkley Point C is expected to support the creation of 15,000 jobs. Once complete, the plant is expected to power around 6 million U.K. homes and contribute 7 percent of the country\u2019s electricity needs. It is planned to launch in the early 2030s, following several years of delays and spiralling costs. However, many believe this is an unrealistic aim. In recent months, workers have complained about poor working conditions and low pay, potentially because of EDF\u2019s financial pressures. Hundreds of project staff also went on strike in November over the inadequate security access to the site.\u00a0<\/p>\n A Hinkley Point C spokesperson said<\/a>, \u201cAs is common across all large construction sites, there will be occasions when the presence of vermin is noted. A specialist company has carried out a survey and measures are in place to address the issue. We are committed to working alongside our trades union partners to provide the best environment for all of our workers.\u201d<\/p>\n Even though the U.S. government has previously assured the public that the TV show The Simpsons was wrong about potential rat infestations, this is not the first time the problem has been seen in recent years. The U.S. Department of Energy published an article in 2018 aiming to debunk several nuclear myths. It stated<\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cNuclear power plants are well-maintained.<\/p>\n The Springfield plant is notorious on the show for its safety violations. They range from rat infestations and cracked cooling towers (held together with chewing gum) to leaky pipes that spill out radioactive waste.<\/p>\n This simply does not happen. The nuclear industry is one of the safest to work in and to live near.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n However, rat problems have been seen in the past, such as during the Fukushima 2013 power cut. In March 2013, the Tokyo Electric Power Co (Tepco) suspected<\/a> that rats may have caused a short circuit in a switchboard, triggering the power cut. Tepco announced that it had found burn marks on a makeshift power switchboard and a 15 cm dead rodent nearby. The outage shut down cooling systems for four spent fuel ponds at reactors 1, 3 and 4, however cooling to the reactors was not affected. Following the incident, engineers spent around 30 hours repairing the damage. This came just two years after a giant earthquake-triggered tsunami caused meltdowns at the plant, which was in the decommissioning stage during the rodent incident.\u00a0<\/p>\n Despite the rodent infestation in the construction phase of Hinkley Point C and during the decommissioning period of Fukushima, rats are, indeed, not a common sight in nuclear power plants thanks to the enforcement of strict safety regulations. For decades the public perception of nuclear power has been negative<\/a>, due to three separate nuclear disasters \u2013 Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukushima. However, nuclear experts have repeatedly tried to reassure the public that nuclear power is one of the safest forms of energy.\u00a0<\/p>\n The International Atomic Energy Agency says<\/a> nuclear power plants are among \u201cthe safest and most secure facilities in the world\u201d, as they are subject to strict international safety standards. The World Nuclear Organisation reminds us<\/a>, \u201cIn the 60-year history of civil nuclear power generation, with over 18,500 cumulative reactor-years across 36 countries, there have been only three significant accidents at nuclear power plants.\u201d While these incidents stuck in the minds of people worldwide, this ratio is extremely low when compared to other forms of energy.\u00a0<\/p>\n Rigorous international standards and regulations, as well as significant improvements to nuclear technology, have helped make nuclear power one of the safest forms of clean energy production. As the public perception of nuclear energy begins to shift to more positive, and countries worldwide look for ways to support a transition away from fossil fuels to green alternatives, we can expect to see a massive nuclear renaissance<\/a> in the coming years.\u00a0<\/p>\n By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com<\/p>\n More Top Reads From Oilprice.com<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The U.K. has ambitious nuclear power plans and is developing several small- and large-scale projects. While opposition, high…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":55291,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3843],"tags":[29332,29331,29335,728,29328,1303,29334,29329,70,13195,16,29330,15,29333],"class_list":{"0":"post-55290","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-construction-delays","9":"tag-edf","10":"tag-energy-development","11":"tag-environment","12":"tag-hinkley-point-c","13":"tag-nuclear-power","14":"tag-nuclear-safety","15":"tag-rat-infestation","16":"tag-science","17":"tag-trade-unions","18":"tag-uk","19":"tag-uk-energy","20":"tag-united-kingdom","21":"tag-worker-safety"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114411095003697553","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55290"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55290\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/55291"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}