{"id":579028,"date":"2025-11-18T21:02:43","date_gmt":"2025-11-18T21:02:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/579028\/"},"modified":"2025-11-18T21:02:43","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T21:02:43","slug":"slashing-affordability-requirements-for-london-housebuilders-too-little-too-late-mps-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/579028\/","title":{"rendered":"Slashing affordability requirements for London housebuilders \u201ctoo little, too late\u201d, MPs claim"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Controversial measures to speed up housebuilding in London \u2013 including reducing the required proportion of affordable homes in new developments \u2013 have been condemned by MPs as \u201ctoo little, too late\u201d for the capital\u2019s crisis.<\/p>\n<p>Sir Sadiq Khan and Housing Secretary Steve Reed struck a deal last month to to cut the required affordable homes ratio from 35per cent to 20per cent to stimulate housebuilding in the capital.<\/p>\n<p>London\u2019s construction stagnation has been well-documented in recent months, with figures published last week suggesting builders began work on just 2,158 new private-sector homes in the first six months of 2025 \u2013 4.9%<br \/>of the Government\u2019s 44,000 half-year target.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, developers made just 1,239 starts on affordable homes from April to September this year, compared to 3,991 in the whole of the last financial year.<\/p>\n<p>In light of the capital\u2019s struggles, MPs took part in the Westminster Hall debate earlier this month to demand further planning reforms and debate whether the agreed housebuilding package would make any difference.<\/p>\n<p>Conservative MP for Old Bexley and Sidcup Louie French said: \u201cI am afraid that the recent measures announced by the Government and the Mayor of London\u2014without consulting London\u2019s 32 boroughs\u2014to unlock house building are too little, and potentially too late.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThey will give developers only temporary, targeted relief from the community infrastructure levy on brownfield sites, but not from the more expensive mayoral levy.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe changes to the affordable homes targets do not go far enough \u2013 at 35 per cent, demand is still placed on industrial and public land, acting as a blocker on these sites that could host thousands of homes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile a temporary fast-track route for homes that provide 20 per cent affordable housing is welcome, it is a minor amendment to a system that has ultimately failed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Only 6,370 affordable homes have been started since the Affordable Homes Programme (AHP) was signed off in July 2023, despite City Hall targeting at least 17,800 starts by next Match.<\/p>\n<p>Mr French said the previous 35 per cent requirement was to blame as it \u201cmade house building in London unviable\u201d, adding: \u201cThis policy may seem like a good way to get London building more social housing, but it has hugely backfired.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe policy [was] effectively a tax on housebuilding.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Luke Taylor MP, the Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for London, claimed the measures would \u201cbarely scratch the surface of the bigger and more profound structural barriers to getting green, affordable and safe housing built.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Other parliamentarians suggested the cut in affordable housing requirements would exacerbate the struggles of poorer Londoners.<\/p>\n<p>Labour MP Apsana Begum, who represents Poplar and Limehouse, said the Mayor\u2019s decision would benefit developers but not those in desperate need of affordable homes.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor so many across London, including in my constituency, the 35 per cent requirement was seen to be an injustice, in and of itself, that contributes to sustaining the housing crisis across London, with rising rates of homelessness, insufficient social housing, soaring rents and associated poor-quality housing,\u201d she told the debate.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe announcement that the requirement will be reduced to 20 per cent therefore feels like adding insult to injury.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cConstituents see no benefit to them, but more profits for developers, at a time when London is experiencing record levels of homelessness. The demand for social rent homes is at an all-time high.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Her Tory counterpart Bob Blackman, the MP for Harrow East, said the decision was a \u201creal concern\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>He added: \u201cThere are 336,366 households on social housing waiting lists in London. The crunch is whether this decision is actually going to deliver any improvement in social housing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Both the Mayor and his deputy responsible for housing, Tom Copley, have blamed a \u201cperfect storm\u201d of factors for London\u2019s failure to keep up with the new government\u2019s demands, including high material costs and interest rates, as well as delays caused by the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).<\/p>\n<p>Fleur Anderson, the Labour MP for Putney, admitted the capital has a \u201cbroken housing situation\u201d but said she had full confidence in Sir Sadiq to deliver.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTackling the housing crisis has always been a top priority for the Mayor of London,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDespite some of the claims made today, the facts speak for themselves. Sadiq Khan has started more new council homes in London than has been the case at any time since the 1970s. Before the pandemic, he completed more homes than had been the case at any time since the 1930s.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat is not luck; it is Labour leadership in action and working hand in hand with Labour boroughs, such as Wandsworth, to deliver for Londoners. Since 2018, 23,000 council homes have been built or are being built with the help of City Hall funding.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Minister for Housing Matthew Pennycook admitted that it was \u201cnot in dispute that house building in London is in crisis\u201d and suggested reducing affordability requirements was a crisis response in order to get spades in the ground.<\/p>\n<p>He concluded: \u201cWe know that there is no single simple solution to the development crisis that London is facing. Action to address the acute viability challenges facing residential development in the capital is a necessary intervention, but it is not sufficient.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis time-limited package will give house building in London a shot in the arm, and the Government look forward to working with the mayor and the GLA to implement the package and kick-start house building in our capital.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>  \ud83d\udce9<br \/>\n  <br \/>\n  <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/Untitled-design-1-e1749297433790.png\" alt=\"Slashing affordability requirements for London housebuilders \u201ctoo little, too late\u201d, MPs claim Harrow Online\" style=\"max-width: 200px;margin: 10px auto\" title=\"Slashing affordability requirements for London housebuilders \u201ctoo little, too late\u201d, MPs claim Harrow Online\"\/><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #333\">Get the latest breaking news, roadworks, crime updates and local events straight to your inbox \u2013 totally free, every day.<\/p>\n<p><strong>SIGN UP below<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Controversial measures to speed up housebuilding in London \u2013 including reducing the required proportion of affordable homes in&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":579029,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7757],"tags":[748,393,4884,7833,257,7834,12,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-579028","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-london","8":"tag-britain","9":"tag-england","10":"tag-great-britain","11":"tag-harrow-online","12":"tag-london","13":"tag-london-news","14":"tag-news","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=579028"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579028\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/579029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=579028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=579028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=579028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}