{"id":58021,"date":"2025-04-28T17:30:13","date_gmt":"2025-04-28T17:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/58021\/"},"modified":"2025-04-28T17:30:13","modified_gmt":"2025-04-28T17:30:13","slug":"utilizing-aquatic-environmental-dna-to-address-global-biodiversity-targets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/58021\/","title":{"rendered":"Utilizing aquatic environmental DNA to address global biodiversity targets"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Keck, F. et al. The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-025-08752-2<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pereira, H. M. et al. Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050. Science 384<\/b>, 458\u2013465 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Loreau, M. et al. Do not downplay biodiversity loss. Nature 601<\/b>, E27\u2013E28 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rockstr\u00f6m, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461<\/b>, 472\u2013475 (2009).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    World Economic Forum. Global Risks Report 2022, 17th edn (WEF, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. Kunming\u2013Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD https:\/\/www.cbd.int\/doc\/decisions\/cop-15\/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf<\/a> (UN, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gonzalez, A. et al. A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7<\/b>, 1947\u20131952 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Almond, R. E., Grooten, M. & Peterson, T. World Wildlife Fund. Living Planet Report 2020 \u2014 Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (WWF, 2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Intergovernmental Science\u2013Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES, 2019).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schwarzenbach, R. P. et al. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 313<\/b>, 1072\u20131077 (2006).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    V\u00f6r\u00f6smarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467<\/b>, 555\u2013561 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lecl\u00e8re, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585<\/b>, 551\u2013556 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg, L. H. Environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 21<\/b>, 1789\u20131793 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C. & Willerslev, E. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 21<\/b>, 2045\u20132050 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pawlowski, J., Apoth\u00e9loz-Perret-Gentil, L. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA: what\u2019s behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. 29<\/b>, 4258\u20134264 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Deiner, K., Fronhofer, E. A., M\u00e4chler, E., Walser, J.-C. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information. Nat. Commun. 7<\/b>, 12544 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, H. et al. A spatial fingerprint of land\u2013water linkage of biodiversity uncovered by remote sensing and environmental DNA. Sci. Total Environ. 867<\/b>, 161365 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yates, M. C., Derry, A. M. & Cristescu, M. E. Environmental RNA: a revolution in ecological resolution? Trends Ecol. Evol. 36<\/b>, 601\u2013609 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Visco, J. A. et al. Environmental monitoring: inferring the diatom index from next-generation sequencing data. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49<\/b>, 7597\u20137605 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kagzi, K., Hechler, R. M., Fussmann, G. F. & Cristescu, M. E. Environmental RNA degrades more rapidly than environmental DNA across a broad range of pH conditions. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 22<\/b>, 2640\u20132650 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pochon, X., Zaiko, A., Fletcher, L. M., Laroche, O. & Wood, S. A. Wanted dead or alive? Using metabarcoding of environmental DNA and RNA to distinguish living assemblages for biosecurity applications. PLoS ONE 12<\/b>, e0187636 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sepulveda, A. et al. Using structured decision making to evaluate potential management responses to detection of dreissenid mussel (Dreissena spp.) environmental DNA. Manag. Biol. Invasion 13<\/b>, 344\u2013368 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    US Fish and Wildlife Service. Great Lakes eDNA monitoring program. Asian carp Canada https:\/\/www.asiancarp.ca\/surveillance-prevention-and-response\/great-lakes-edna-monitoring-program\/<\/a> (US FWS, 2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Romero, F., Acu\u00f1a, V. & Sabater, S. Multiple stressors determine community structure and estimated function of river biofilm bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86<\/b>, e00291\u2013e00320 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Beermann, A. J., Zizka, V. M. A., Elbrecht, V., Baranov, V. & Leese, F. DNA metabarcoding reveals the complex and hidden responses of chironomids to multiple stressors. Environ. Sci. Eur. 30<\/b>, 26 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fediajevaite, J., Priestley, V., Arnold, R. & Savolainen, V. Meta-analysis shows that environmental DNA outperforms traditional surveys, but warrants better reporting standards. Ecol. Evol. 11<\/b>, 4803\u20134815 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Buchner, D., Macher, T.-H., Beermann, A. J., Werner, M.-T. & Leese, F. Standardized high-throughput biomonitoring using DNA metabarcoding: strategies for the adoption of automated liquid handlers. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 8<\/b>, 100122 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J. & Rahman, M. S. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: a systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17<\/b>, e00547 (2019).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Biggs, J. et al. Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus). Biol. Conserv. 183<\/b>, 19\u201328 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Larson, E. R. et al. From eDNA to citizen science: emerging tools for the early detection of invasive species. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18<\/b>, 194\u2013202 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Couton, M. et al. Integrating citizen science and environmental DNA metabarcoding to study biodiversity of groundwater amphipods in Switzerland. Sci. Rep. 13<\/b>, 18097 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Deiner, K. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 26<\/b>, 5872\u20135895 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74<\/b>, 5463\u20135467 (1977).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mullis, K. et al. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 51<\/b>, 263\u2013273 (1986).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Higuchi, R., Fockler, C., Dollinger, G. & Watson, R. Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology 11<\/b>, 1026\u20131030 (1993).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Margulies, M. et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437<\/b>, 376\u2013380 (2005).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bruce, K. et al. A Practical Guide to DNA-Based Methods for Biodiversity Assessment (Pensoft, 2021).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sigsgaard, E. E. et al. Population-level inferences from environmental DNA \u2014 current status and future perspectives. Evol. Appl. 13<\/b>, 245\u2013262 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abad-Recio, I. L., Alonso-S\u00e1ez, L. & Lanz\u00e9n, A. Toward functional profiling for eDNA\u2010based monitoring in coastal environments: a comparison of three approaches. Environ. DNA 6<\/b>, e504 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    MacKenzie, M. & Argyropoulos, C. An introduction to nanopore sequencing: past, present, and future considerations. Micromachines 14<\/b>, 459 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bovo, S. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of honey DNA: evaluation of a methodological approach to describe a multi-kingdom honey bee derived environmental DNA signature. PLoS ONE 13<\/b>, e0205575 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Thomsen, P. F., Jensen, M. R. & Sigsgaard, E. E. A vision for global eDNA-based monitoring in a changing world. Cell 187<\/b>, 4444\u20134448 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ogram, A., Sayler, G. S. & Barkay, T. The extraction and purification of microbial DNA from sediments. J. Microbiol. Methods 7<\/b>, 57\u201366 (1987).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Steffan, R. J., Goks\u00f8yr, J., Bej, A. K. & Atlas, R. M. Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54<\/b>, 2908\u20132915 (1988).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & deWaard, J. R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270<\/b>, 313\u2013321 (2003).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ficetola, G. F., Miaud, C., Pompanon, F. & Taberlet, P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol. Lett. 4<\/b>, 423\u2013425 (2008).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Blackman, R. et al. Environmental DNA: the next chapter. Mol. Ecol. 33<\/b>, e17355 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Satam, H. et al. Next-generation sequencing technology: current trends and advancements. Biology 2023<\/b>, 997 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Foote, A. D. et al. Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. PLoS ONE 7<\/b>, e41781 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leese, F. et al. DNAqua-Net: developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe. Res. Ideas Outcomes 2<\/b>, e11321 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Takahashi, M. et al. Aquatic environmental DNA: a review of the macro-organismal biomonitoring revolution. Sci. Total Environ. 873<\/b>, 162322 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    De Brauwer, M. et al. Best practice guidelines for environmental DNA biomonitoring in Australia and New Zealand. Environ. DNA 5<\/b>, 417\u2013423 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ferrante, J. et al. Gaining decision-maker confidence through community consensus: developing environmental DNA standards for data display on the USGS Nonindigenous Aquatic Species database. Manag. Biol. Invasion 13<\/b>, 809\u2013832 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Minamoto, T. et al. An illustrated manual for environmental DNA research: water sampling guidelines and experimental protocols. Environ. DNA 3<\/b>, 8\u201313 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andruszkiewicz Allan, E., Zhang, W. G., C. Lavery, A. & Govindarajan, F. A. Environmental DNA shedding and decay rates from diverse animal forms and thermal regimes. Environ. DNA 3<\/b>, 492\u2013514 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Deiner, K. & Altermatt, F. Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLoS ONE 9<\/b>, e88786 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Burian, A. et al. Improving the reliability of eDNA data interpretation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21<\/b>, 1422\u20131433 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Keck, F., Couton, M. & Altermatt, F. Navigating the seven challenges of taxonomic reference databases in metabarcoding analyses. Mol. Ecol. Resour. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1755-0998.13746<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goldberg, C. S., Strickler, K. M. & Pilliod, D. S. Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms. Biol. Conserv. 183<\/b>, 1\u20133 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gonzalez, A. & Londo\u00f1o, M. C. Monitor biodiversity for action. Science 378<\/b>, 1147 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Norros, V. et al. Roadmap for implementing environmental DNA (eDNA) and other molecular monitoring methods in Finland \u2014 vision and action plan for 2022\u20132025 (Finnish Environment Institute, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Blancher, P. et al. A strategy for successful integration of DNA-based methods in aquatic monitoring. MBMG 6<\/b>, e85652 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Kelly, R. P. et al. Toward a national eDNA strategy for the United States. Environ. DNA https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/edn3.432<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mason, D. H. et al. Certain detection of uncertain taxa: eDNA detection of a cryptic mountain sucker (Pantosteus jordani) in the Upper Missouri River, USA. Environ. DNA 3<\/b>, 449\u2013457 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Couton, M., H\u00fcrlemann, S., Studer, A., Alther, R. & Altermatt, F. Groundwater environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals hidden diversity and reflects land-use and geology. Mol. Ecol. 32<\/b>, 3497\u20133512 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Laroche, O., Kersten, O., Smith, C. R. & Goetze, E. From sea surface to seafloor: a benthic allochthonous eDNA survey for the abyssal ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmars.2020.00682<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lee, K. N., Kelly, R. P., Demir-Hilton, E., Laschever, E. & Allan, E. A. Adoption of environmental DNA in public agency practice. Environ. DNA https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/edn3.470<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sander, M. et al. Environmental DNA time series analysis of a temperate stream reveals distinct seasonal community and functional shifts. River Res. Appl. 40<\/b>, 850\u2013862 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tillotson, M. D. et al. Concentrations of environmental DNA (eDNA) reflect spawning salmon abundance at fine spatial and temporal scales. Biol. Conserv. 220<\/b>, 1\u201311 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Formel, N., Enochs, I. C., Sinigalliano, C., Anderson, S. R. & Thompson, L. R. Subsurface automated samplers for eDNA (SASe) for biological monitoring and research. HardwareX 10<\/b>, e00239 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hendricks, A. et al. A miniaturized and automated eDNA sampler: application to a marine environment. In OCEANS 2022, Hampton Roads https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/oceans47191.2022.9977218<\/a> (IEEE, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hendricks, A. et al. Compact and automated eDNA sampler for in situ monitoring of marine environments. Sci. Rep. 13<\/b>, 5210 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    George, S. D. et al. Field trials of an autonomous eDNA sampler in lotic waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58<\/b>, 20942\u201320953 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Preston, C. M. et al. Underwater application of quantitative PCR on an ocean mooring. PLoS ONE 6<\/b>, e22522 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hansen, B. K. et al. Remote, autonomous real-time monitoring of environmental DNA from commercial fish. Sci. Rep. 10<\/b>, 13272 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sepulveda, A. J. et al. Robotic environmental DNA bio-surveillance of freshwater health. Sci. Rep. 10<\/b>, 14389 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Maiello, G. et al. Little samplers, big fleet: eDNA metabarcoding from commercial trawlers enhances ocean monitoring. Fish. Res. 249<\/b>, 106259 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chen, X. et al. Comparative evaluation of common materials as passive samplers of environmental DNA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56<\/b>, 10798\u201310807 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pont, D. Predicting downstream transport distance of fish eDNA in lotic environments. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 24<\/b>, e13934 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Van Driessche, C., Everts, T., Neyrinck, S. & Brys, R. Experimental assessment of downstream environmental DNA patterns under variable fish biomass and river discharge rates. Environ. DNA 5<\/b>, 102\u2013116 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Brantschen, J. et al. Habitat suitability models reveal the spatial signal of environmental DNA in riverine networks. Ecography https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ecog.07267<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cantera, I. et al. Low level of anthropization linked to harsh vertebrate biodiversity declines in Amazonia. Nat. Commun. 13<\/b>, 3290 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zong, S. et al. Combining environmental DNA with remote sensing variables to map fish species distributions along a large river. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 10<\/b>, 220\u2013235 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jeunen, G.-J. et al. Water stratification in the marine biome restricts vertical environmental DNA (eDNA) signal dispersal. Environ. DNA 2<\/b>, 99\u2013111 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jeunen, G.-J. et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19<\/b>, 426\u2013438 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Laporte, M. et al. Caged fish experiment and hydrodynamic bidimensional modeling highlight the importance to consider 2D dispersion in fluvial environmental DNA studies. Environ. DNA 2<\/b>, 362\u2013372 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sansom, B. J. & Sassoubre, L. M. Environmental DNA (eDNA) shedding and decay rates to model freshwater mussel eDNA transport in a river. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51<\/b>, 14244\u201314253 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andruszkiewicz, E. A. et al. Modeling environmental DNA transport in the coastal ocean using Lagrangian particle tracking. Front. Mar. Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmars.2019.00477<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fukaya, K. et al. Estimating fish population abundance by integrating quantitative data on environmental DNA and hydrodynamic modelling. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 3057\u20133067 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carraro, L. & Altermatt, F. eDITH: an R\u2010package to spatially project eDNA\u2010based biodiversity across river networks with minimal prior information. Methods Ecol. Evol. 15<\/b>, 806\u2013815 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carraro, L., M\u00e4chler, E., W\u00fcthrich, R. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA allows upscaling spatial patterns of biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11<\/b>, 3585 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Blackman, R. C., Carraro, L., Keck, F. & Altermatt, F. Measuring the state of aquatic environments using eDNA-upscaling spatial resolution of biotic indices. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 379<\/b>, 20230121 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jerde, C. L. et al. Detection of Asian carp DNA as part of a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70<\/b>, 522\u2013526 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Rees, H. C. et al. The application of eDNA for monitoring of the great crested newt in the UK. Ecol. Evol. 4<\/b>, 4023\u20134032 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jahn, K. et al. Early detection and surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 genomic variants in wastewater using COJAC. Nat. Microbiol. 7<\/b>, 1151\u20131160 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Feist, S. M. & Lance, R. F. Genetic detection of freshwater harmful algal blooms: a review focused on the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) in Microcystis aeruginosa and Prymnesium parvum. Harmful Algae 110<\/b>, 102124 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abdul Manaff, A. H. N. et al. Mapping harmful microalgal species by eDNA monitoring: a large-scale survey across the southwestern South China Sea. Harmful Algae 129<\/b>, 102515 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Blackman, R. C. et al. Targeted and passive environmental DNA approaches outperform established methods for detection of quagga mussels, Dreissena rostriformis bugensis in flowing water. Ecol. Evol. 10<\/b>, 13248\u201313259 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Danziger, A. M. & Frederich, M. Challenges in eDNA detection of the invasive European green crab, Carcinus maenas. Biol. Invasions 24<\/b>, 1881\u20131894 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mansfeldt, C. et al. Microbial community shifts in streams receiving treated wastewater effluent. Sci. Total Environ. 709<\/b>, 135727 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yamamoto, S. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals local fish communities in a species-rich coastal sea. Sci. Rep. 7<\/b>, 40368 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Inoue, Y., Miyata, K., Yamane, M. & Honda, H. Environmental nucleic acid pollution: characterization of wastewater generating false positives in molecular ecological surveys. ACS ES&T Water 3<\/b>, 756\u2013764 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Darling, J. A., Jerde, C. L. & Sepulveda, A. J. What do you mean by false positive. Environ. DNA 3<\/b>, 879\u2013883 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ficetola, G. F., Taberlet, P. & Coissac, E. How to limit false positives in environmental DNA and metabarcoding? Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16<\/b>, 604\u2013607 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    McCauley, M., Koda, S. A., Loesgen, S. & Duffy, D. J. Multicellular species environmental DNA (eDNA) research constrained by overfocus on mitochondrial DNA. Sci. Total Environ. 912<\/b>, 169550 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pilliod, D. S., Goldberg, C. S., Arkle, R. S. & Waits, L. P. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70<\/b>, 1123\u20131130 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Doi, H. et al. Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish. Freshw. Biol. 62<\/b>, 30\u201339 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Di Muri, C. et al. Read counts from environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reflect fish abundance and biomass in drained ponds. MBMG 4<\/b>, e56959 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pont, D. et al. Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 23<\/b>, 396\u2013409 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nakagawa, H., Fukushima, K., Sakai, M., Wu, L. & Minamoto, T. Relationships between the eDNA concentration obtained from metabarcoding and stream fish abundance estimated by the removal method under field conditions. Environ. DNA 4<\/b>, 1369\u20131380 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fonseca, V. G. Pitfalls in relative abundance estimation using eDNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18<\/b>, 923\u2013926 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yates, M. C., Fraser, D. J. & Derry, A. M. Meta\u2010analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species\u2010specific abundance in nature. Environ. DNA 1<\/b>, 5\u201313 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sepulveda, A. J. et al. It\u2019s complicated environmental DNA as a predictor of trout and char abundance in streams. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 78<\/b>, 422\u2013432 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sigsgaard, E. E. et al. Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1<\/b>, 0004 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weitemier, K. et al. Estimating the genetic diversity of Pacific salmon and trout using multigene eDNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 4970\u20134990 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Parsons, K. M., Everett, M., Dahlheim, M. & Park, L. Water, water everywhere: environmental DNA can unlock population structure in elusive marine species. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5<\/b>, 180537 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Elbrecht, V., Vamos, E. E., Steinke, D. & Leese, F. Estimating intraspecific genetic diversity from community DNA metabarcoding data. PeerJ 6<\/b>, e4644 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Turon, X., Antich, A., Palac\u00edn, C., Praebel, K. & Wangensteen, O. S. From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaff. Ecol. Appl. 30<\/b>, e02036 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Couton, M., Viard, F. & Altermatt, F. Opportunities and inherent limits of using environmental DNA for population genetics. Environ. DNA 5<\/b>, 1048\u20131064 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andres, K. J., Sethi, S. A., Lodge, D. M. & Andr\u00e9s, J. Nuclear eDNA estimates population allele frequencies and abundance in experimental mesocosms and field samples. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 685\u2013697 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wolf, K. K. E. et al. Revealing environmentally driven population dynamics of an Arctic diatom using a novel microsatellite PoolSeq barcoding approach. Environ. Microbiol. 23<\/b>, 3809\u20133824 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D. & Stribling, J. B. US Environmental Protection Agency. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers (US EPA, 1999).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cordier, T. et al. Ecosystems monitoring powered by environmental genomics: a review of current strategies with an implementation roadmap. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 2937\u20132958 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, J. et al. Ecogenomics of zooplankton community reveals ecological threshold of ammonia nitrogen. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51<\/b>, 3057\u20133064 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nuy, J. K. et al. Responses of stream microbes to multiple anthropogenic stressors in a mesocosm study. Sci. Total Environ. 633<\/b>, 1287\u20131301 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, F. et al. Application of environmental DNA metabarcoding for predicting anthropogenic pollution in rivers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52<\/b>, 11708\u201311719 (2018).<\/p>\n

    CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Blackman, R. C., Ho, H.-C., Walser, J.-C. & Altermatt, F. Spatio-temporal patterns of multi-trophic biodiversity and food-web characteristics uncovered across a river catchment using environmental DNA. Commun. Biol. 5<\/b>, 259 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stevens, J. D. & Parsley, M. B. Environmental RNA applications and their associated gene targets for management and conservation. Environ. DNA 5<\/b>, 227\u2013239 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bergsveinson, J. et al. Metatranscriptomic insights into the response of river biofilm communities to ionic and nano-zinc oxide exposures. Front. Microbiol. 11<\/b>, 267 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hechler, R. M., Yates, M. C., Chain, F. J. J. & Cristescu, M. E. Environmental transcriptomics under heat stress: can environmental RNA reveal changes in gene expression of aquatic organisms? Mol. Ecol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/mec.17152<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cordier, T. et al. Predicting the ecological quality status of marine environments from eDNA metabarcoding data using supervised machine learning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51<\/b>, 9118\u20139126 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Keck, F., Brantschen, J. & Altermatt, F. A combination of machine-learning and eDNA reveals the genetic signature of environmental change at the landscape levels. Mol. Ecol. 32<\/b>, 4791\u20134800 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Salis, R. K., Bruder, A., Piggott, J. J., Summerfield, T. C. & Matthaei, C. D. High-throughput amplicon sequencing and stream benthic bacteria: identifying the best taxonomic level for multiple-stressor research. Sci. Rep. 7<\/b>, 44657 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sagova-Mareckova, M. et al. Expanding ecological assessment by integrating microorganisms into routine freshwater biomonitoring. Water Res. 191<\/b>, 116767 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cordier, T., Lanz\u00e9n, A., Apoth\u00e9loz-Perret-Gentil, L., Stoeck, T. & Pawlowski, J. Embracing environmental genomics and machine learning for routine biomonitoring. Trends Microbiol. 27<\/b>, 387\u2013397 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mart\u00ednez-Santos, M. et al. Treated and untreated wastewater effluents alter river sediment bacterial communities involved in nitrogen and sulphur cycling. Sci. Total Environ. 633<\/b>, 1051\u20131061 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    And\u00fajar, C. et al. Metabarcoding of freshwater invertebrates to detect the effects of a pesticide spill. Mol. Ecol. 27<\/b>, 146\u2013166 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Vasselon, V., Rimet, F., Tapolczai, K. & Bouchez, A. Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte island, France). Ecol. Indic. 82<\/b>, 1\u201312 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Apoth\u00e9loz-Perret-Gentil, L. et al. Taxonomy-free molecular diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17<\/b>, 1231\u20131242 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Feio, M. J. et al. A taxonomy-free approach based on machine learning to assess the quality of rivers with diatoms. Sci. Total Environ. 722<\/b>, 137900 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fr\u00fche, L. et al. Supervised machine learning is superior to indicator value inference in monitoring the environmental impacts of salmon aquaculture using eDNA metabarcodes. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 2988\u20133006 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Cordier, T. et al. Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18<\/b>, 1381\u20131391 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wilkinson, S. P. et al. TICI: a taxon-independent community index for eDNA-based ecological health assessment. PeerJ 12<\/b>, e16963 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Zhang, Y., Zhang, X., Li, F. & Altermatt, F. Fishing eDNA in one of the world\u2019s largest rivers: a case study of cross-sectional and depth profile sampling in the Yangtze. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57<\/b>, 21691\u201321703 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gold, Z., Sprague, J., Kushner, D. J., Zerecero Marin, E. & Barber, P. H. eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas. PLoS ONE 16<\/b>, e0238557 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stewart, K., Ma, H., Zheng, J. & Zhao, J. Using environmental DNA to assess population-wide spatiotemporal reserve use. Conserv. Biol. 31<\/b>, 1173\u20131182 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    McClenaghan, B. et al. Harnessing the power of eDNA metabarcoding for the detection of deep-sea fishes. PLoS ONE 15<\/b>, e0236540 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Fujiwara, Y. et al. Detection of the largest deep-sea-endemic teleost fish at depths of over 2,000 m through a combination of eDNA metabarcoding and baited camera observations. Front. Mar. Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmars.2022.945758<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    van der Heyde, M. et al. Taking eDNA underground: factors affecting eDNA detection of subterranean fauna in groundwater. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 23<\/b>, 1257\u20131274 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Savio, D. et al. Bacterial diversity along a 2600 km river continuum. Environ. Microbiol. 17<\/b>, 4994\u20135007 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    De Ventura, L., Kopp, K., Sepp\u00e4l\u00e4, K. & Jokela, J. Tracing the quagga mussel invasion along the Rhine River system using eDNA markers: early detection and surveillance of invasive zebra and quagga mussels. MBio 8<\/b>, 101\u2013112 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Adams, A. J. et al. From eDNA to decisions using a multi-method approach to restoration planning in streams. Sci. Rep. 14<\/b>, 14335 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mahon, A. R. et al. Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments. PLoS ONE 8<\/b>, e58316 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    US Fish and Wildlife Service. Quality assurance project plan eDNA monitoring of bighead and silver carps. USFWS Great Lakes region 3 (US FWS, 2022).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ellis, M. R. et al. Detecting marine pests using environmental DNA and biophysical models. Sci. Total Environ. 816<\/b>, 151666 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Matejusova, I. et al. Environmental DNA based surveillance for the highly invasive carpet sea squirt Didemnum vexillum: a targeted single-species approach. Front. Mar. Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fmars.2021.728456<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Sepulveda, A. J. et al. When are environmental DNA early detections of invasive species actionable? J. Environ. Manage. 343<\/b>, 118216 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, F. et al. Human activities\u2019 fingerprint on multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functions across a major river catchment in China. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26<\/b>, 6867\u20136879 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lanz\u00e9n, A., Dahlgren, T. G., Bagi, A. & Hestetun, J. T. Benthic eDNA metabarcoding provides accurate assessments of impact from oil extraction, and ecological insights. Ecol. Indic. 130<\/b>, 108064 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Suzzi, A. L. et al. eDNA metabarcoding reveals shifts in sediment eukaryote communities in a metal contaminated estuary. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 191<\/b>, 114896 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stoeck, T. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of benthic bacterial communities indicates the benthic footprint of salmon aquaculture. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 127<\/b>, 139\u2013149 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Keck, F. et al. Meta-analysis shows both congruence and complementarity of DNA and eDNA metabarcoding to traditional methods for biological community assessment. Mol. Ecol. 31<\/b>, 1820\u20131835 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leese, F. et al. Why we need sustainable networks bridging countries, disciplines, cultures and generations for aquatic biomonitoring 2.0: a perspective derived from the DNAqua-net COST action. Adv. Ecol. Res. 58<\/b>, 63\u201399 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pont, D. et al. The future of fish-based ecological assessment of European rivers: from traditional EU Water Framework Directive compliant methods to eDNA metabarcoding-based approaches. J. Fish Biol. 98<\/b>, 354\u2013366 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pawlowski, J., Bonin, A., Boyer, F., Cordier, T. & Taberlet, P. Environmental DNA for biomonitoring. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 2931\u20132936 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meyer, A. et al. Morphological vs. DNA metabarcoding approaches for the evaluation of stream ecological status with benthic invertebrates: testing different combinations of markers and strategies of data filtering. Mol. Ecol. 30<\/b>, 3203\u20133220 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Blackman, R. C. et al. Advancing the use of molecular methods for routine freshwater macroinvertebrate biomonitoring \u2014 the need for calibration experiments. MBMG 3<\/b>, e34735 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pawlowski, J., Apoth\u00e9loz-Perret-Gentil, L., M\u00e4chler, E. & Altermatt, F. Environmental DNA Applications for Biomonitoring and Bioassessment in Aquatic Ecosystems. Guidelines. Environmental Studies no. 2010: 71 (Federal Office for the Environment, 2020).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Laamanen, T. et al. Technology readiness level of biodiversity monitoring with molecular methods \u2013 where are we on the road to routine implementation? Metabarcoding Metagenom. 9<\/b>, e130834 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yang, J., Zhang, L., Mu, Y. & Zhang, X. Small changes make big progress: a more efficient eDNA monitoring method for freshwater fish. Environ. DNA 5<\/b>, 363\u2013374 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shea, M. M. et al. Systematic review of marine environmental DNA metabarcoding studies: toward best practices for data usability and accessibility. PeerJ 11<\/b>, e14993 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, J., Lawson Handley, L.-J., Read, D. S. & H\u00e4nfling, B. The effect of filtration method on the efficiency of environmental DNA capture and quantification via metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18<\/b>, 1102\u20131114 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Deiner, K. et al. Optimising the detection of marine taxonomic richness using environmental DNA metabarcoding: the effects of filter material, pore size and extraction method. MBMG 2<\/b>, e28963 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Loeza-Quintana, T., Abbott, C. L., Heath, D. D., Bernatchez, L. & Hanner, R. H. Pathway to increase standards and competency of eDNA surveys (PISCeS)\u2014 advancing collaboration and standardization efforts in the field of eDNA. Environ. DNA 2<\/b>, 255\u2013260 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Altermatt, F. et al. Quantifying biodiversity using eDNA from water bodies: general principles and recommendations for sampling designs. Environ. DNA 5<\/b>, 671\u2013682 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    ISO\/DIS 17805:2023. Water Quality \u2014 Sampling, Capture and Preservation of Environmental DNA from Water (ISO, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Weigand, H. et al. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. Sci. Total Environ. 678<\/b>, 499\u2013524 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Li, F. et al. Gap analysis for DNA-based biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems in China. Ecol. Indic. 137<\/b>, 108732 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Briski, E., Ghabooli, S., Bailey, S. A. & MacIsaac, H. J. Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species? Biol. Invasions 18<\/b>, 1911\u20131922 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mc Cartney, A. M. et al. The European Reference Genome Atlas: piloting a decentralised approach to equitable biodiversity genomics. npj Biodivers. 3<\/b>, 28 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hebert, P. D. N., Floyd, R., Jafarpour, S. & Prosser, S. W. J. Barcode 100K specimens: in a single nanopore run. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 25<\/b>, e14028 (2025).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pomerantz, A. et al. Real-time DNA barcoding in a rainforest using nanopore sequencing: opportunities for rapid biodiversity assessments and local capacity building. Gigascience 7<\/b>, giy033 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lin, D. et al. The TRUST principles for digital repositories. Sci. Data 7<\/b>, 144 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Leigh, D. M. et al. Best practices for genetic and genomic data archiving. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8<\/b>, 1224\u20131232 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nilsson, R. H. et al. Introducing guidelines for publishing DNA-derived occurrence data through biodiversity data platforms. MBMG 6<\/b>, e84960 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Berry, O. et al. Making environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity records globally accessible. Environ. DNA 3<\/b>, 699\u2013705 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yilmaz, P. et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 29<\/b>, 415\u2013420 (2011).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Meyer, R. et al. Aligning standards communities for omics biodiversity data: sustainable Darwin Core\u2013MIxS interoperability. Biodivers. Data J. 11<\/b>, e112420 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Abarenkov, K. et al. Publishing DNA-derived data through biodiversity data platforms v1.3 (GBIF Secretariat, 2023).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Klymus, K. E. et al. The MIEM guidelines: minimum information for reporting of environmental metabarcoding data. MBMG https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3897\/mbmg.8.128689<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Takahashi, M. et al. Best practice for publishing environmental DNA (eDNA) data according to FAIR principles. Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3897\/biss.8.137742<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3<\/b>, 160018 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goldberg, C. S. et al. Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7<\/b>, 1299\u20131307 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Shen, E. W., Vandenberg, J. M. & Moore, A. Sensing inequity: technological solutionism, biodiversity conservation, and environmental DNA. Biosocieties 19<\/b>, 501\u2013525 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carroll, S. R. et al. The CARE principles for indigenous data governance. Data Sci. J. 19<\/b>, 43 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations, 2011).<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Stammnitz, M. R., Hartman Scholz, A. & Duffy, D. J. Environmental DNA without borders: let\u2019s embrace decentralised genomics to meet the UN\u2019s biodiversity targets. EMBO Rep. 25<\/b>, 4095\u20134099 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Handsley-Davis, M., Kowal, E., Russell, L. & Weyrich, L. S. Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5<\/b>, 146\u2013148 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Wauchope, H. S. et al. What is a unit of nature? Measurement challenges in the emerging biodiversity credit market. Proc. Biol. Sci. 291<\/b>, 20242353 (2024).<\/p>\n


    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bhutta, U. S., Tariq, A., Farrukh, M., Raza, A. & Iqbal, M. K. Green bonds for sustainable development: review of literature on development and impact of green bonds. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 175<\/b>, 121378 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Watt, R. The fantasy of carbon offsetting. Environ. Politics 30<\/b>, 1069\u20131088 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ford, H. V. et al. A technological biodiversity monitoring toolkit for biocredits. J. Appl. Ecol. 61<\/b>, 2007\u20132019 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Jarman, S. N., Berry, O. & Bunce, M. The value of environmental DNA biobanking for long-term biomonitoring. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2<\/b>, 1192\u20131193 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Keck, F. et al. The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-025-08752-2 (2025). Pereira, H. M. et al.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":58022,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3843],"tags":[4675,12309,12310,728,2202,3968,12308,12307,70,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-58021","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-biodiversity","9":"tag-ecology","10":"tag-ecosystems","11":"tag-environment","12":"tag-environmental-impact","13":"tag-general","14":"tag-life-sciences","15":"tag-nature-conservation","16":"tag-science","17":"tag-uk","18":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114416781161278292","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58021","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58021"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58021\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/58022"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58021"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58021"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58021"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}