{"id":581912,"date":"2025-11-20T05:45:41","date_gmt":"2025-11-20T05:45:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/581912\/"},"modified":"2025-11-20T05:45:41","modified_gmt":"2025-11-20T05:45:41","slug":"religious-education-in-ni-schools-breaches-human-rights-supreme-court-rules-the-irish-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/581912\/","title":{"rendered":"Religious education in NI schools breaches human rights, Supreme Court rules \u2013 The Irish News"},"content":{"rendered":"

The provision of Christian religious education in Northern Ireland schools does not comply with human rights standards and is unlawful, the UK Supreme Court has ruled.<\/p>\n

In a landmark judgment, the court upheld an appeal brought by a pupil at a Belfast school and her father and reinstated an earlier court ruling that the teaching of RE and collective worship breaches human rights as it does not approach the subject in an \u201cobjective, critical and pluralist manner\u201d.<\/p>\n

Stormont\u2019s Department of Education has said it will provide advice to schools on the \u201ccomplex\u201d judgment in the near future.<\/p>\n

The pupil, known as JR87, was at a controlled primary school in Belfast in 2019 when, as part of the curriculum, she took part in non-denominational Christian religious education and collective worship.<\/p>\n

\"Popular<\/a>\"Belfast<\/a><\/p>\n

Her parents wrote a letter to the school voicing concerns that their daughter\u2019s education did not appear to conform with their own religious and philosophical convictions.<\/p>\n

In a reply, the school confirmed its provision of religious education and collective worship was \u201cBible-based\u201d and that it followed the core syllabus for education.<\/p>\n

\"TheThe Supreme Court has delivered a ruling over the teaching of religious education in schools (Danny Lawson\/PA) <\/p>\n

JR87 and her father, known as G, challenged the legality of this and sought judicial review against the Department of Education.<\/p>\n

Their lawyers argued the religious education and collective worship in the school contravened their human rights requiring the state to provide education to \u201crespect the right of parents to ensure such education is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions\u201d.<\/p>\n

The High Court in Belfast found in favour of the family in 2022 and said the Christian RE taught and collective worship in schools in Northern Ireland is unlawful.<\/p>\n

However, this was overturned by the Court of Appeal, so the family took their case to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n

In a unanimous judgment delivered on Wednesday, the UK\u2019s highest court allowed the appeal brought by JR87 and G and dismissed a cross-appeal brought by the department.<\/p>\n

Delivering the judgment, Lord Stephens said: \u201cThe Court of Appeal was wrong in its application of established principles of ECHR law and should not have departed from the (High Court) judge\u2019s finding that the parents had valid concerns in relation to withdrawing JR87 from religious education and collective worship.<\/p>\n

\u201cFurthermore, the Court of Appeal fell into error in making a distinction between indoctrination and the state conveying information or knowledge in a manner which was not objective, critical, and pluralistic.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe concepts are two sides of the same coin: conveying knowledge in a manner that is not objective, critical, and pluralistic amounts to pursuing the aim of indoctrination.\u201d<\/p>\n

Lord Stephens also said the Court of Appeal ought to have found that having to withdraw JR87 from religious education was \u201ccapable of placing an undue burden\u201d on her parents.<\/p>\n

He said the judgment \u201cwas not about secularism in the education system\u201d and made clear that \u201cno one is suggesting that RE should not be provided in schools in Northern Ireland\u201d.<\/p>\n

Lord Stephens added: \u201cThe family strongly support the provision of religious education provided it does not amount to indoctrination.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"SolicitorSolicitor Darragh Mackin said the ruling is a \u2018watershed moment\u2019 for educational rights in Northern Ireland (Niall Carson\/PA) <\/p>\n

Responding to the judgment, Darragh Mackin of Phoenix Law, solicitor for JR87 and her father, said it was a \u201cwatershed moment\u201d for educational rights.<\/p>\n

He said: \u201cThe Supreme Court has confirmed that all children are entitled to an education that respects their freedom of thought, conscience, and religion.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe judgment makes clear that the State cannot rely on withdrawal mechanisms to justify religious instruction.<\/p>\n

\u201cSchools must not place children in the impossible position of being singled out or stigmatised simply because their families do not share the religious worldview embedded in the curriculum.\u201d<\/p>\n

A Department of Education spokesperson said: \u201cThe department notes the UK Supreme Court\u2019s judgment.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe will carefully consider the complex judgment and its implications and will provide advice to schools in the near future.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"FormerFormer education minister Michelle McIlveen said the ruling was \u2018deeply disappointing\u2019 (Brian Lawless\/PA) <\/p>\n

DUP deputy leader and former education minister in Northern Ireland Michelle McIlveen described the court ruling as \u201cdeeply disappointing\u201d.<\/p>\n

She said: \u201cWhile we respect the court and the legal process, this ruling will concern many parents, governors, teachers and faith communities across Northern Ireland for whom the ethos is so important.<\/p>\n

\u201cFor generations, Christian values have shaped the moral character of our school system.<\/p>\n

\u201cThrough assemblies, school activities and the everyday life of the classroom, those values have helped form young people with integrity and respect for others.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat heritage is not something we apologise for, nor is it something we are prepared to see diminished.\u201d<\/p>\n

Humanists UK has called on the UK Government to \u201curgently review\u201d the RE and collective worship laws in state schools in England.<\/p>\n

Education campaigns manager Lewis Young said: \u201cToday\u2019s judgment makes it crystal clear that you cannot respect families\u2019 human rights simply by telling them they can opt out of a system that is, at its core, religiously one-sided.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn light of this ruling, the position on faith-based RE and collective worship has become impossible to justify.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe UK Government must urgently review the RE and collective worship laws in England and move to replace them with inclusive assemblies and teaching that respect every child\u2019s freedom of belief.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The provision of Christian religious education in Northern Ireland schools does not comply with human rights standards and…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":581913,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5011],"tags":[30,183912,60801,183913,1144,183914,8547,857,16,16468,7913,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-581912","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-northern-ireland","8":"tag-courts","9":"tag-darragh-mackin","10":"tag-department-of-education","11":"tag-lord-stephens","12":"tag-northern-ireland","13":"tag-phoenix-law","14":"tag-religion","15":"tag-schools","16":"tag-uk","17":"tag-uk-supreme-court","18":"tag-ulster","19":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115580445589599963","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/581912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=581912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/581912\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/581913"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=581912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=581912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=581912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}