{"id":598505,"date":"2025-11-28T04:21:13","date_gmt":"2025-11-28T04:21:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/598505\/"},"modified":"2025-11-28T04:21:13","modified_gmt":"2025-11-28T04:21:13","slug":"uk-and-eu-explore-pay-as-you-go-model-to-break-defense-talks-deadlock-politico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/598505\/","title":{"rendered":"UK and EU explore \u2018pay as you go\u2019 model to break defense talks deadlock \u2013 POLITICO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SAFE is meant to kick-start a European security renaissance, provide independence from the U.S. and give the continent the tools to defend itself against Russian aggression.<\/p>\n<p>The EU wants the U.K., with its large defense industry, in the tent. Britain wants in too \u2014 predicting benefits for its industry and its security. But so far, they&#8217;ve not been able to agree about cash.<\/p>\n<p>London has balked at the high price tag Brussels is demanding \u2014 ranging from \u20ac2 billion to \u20ac6.5 billion, but London is offering much less. <\/p>\n<p>While details on the alternative models being discussed are still sketchy, one idea is that the U.K. may be able to avoid the \u2018sticker shock&#8217; of a high upfront price by signing up to a more \u2018pay as you go\u2019 approach that depends on the ultimate level of U.K. participation.<\/p>\n<p>It might just be what&#8217;s needed to get an agreement over the line. Both sides want a deal by Sunday so that the U.K. is in the room before EU member countries submit their spending plans to the Commission on the same day.<\/p>\n<p>Under SAFE, outside countries can only account for a maximum of 35 percent of the value of a weapons system, but the U.K. is negotiating for a higher percentage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"SAFE is meant to kick-start a European security renaissance, provide independence from the U.S. and give the continent&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":598506,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5174],"tags":[943,6215,473,2000,299,5187,7058,1699,806,54490,809,3209,7061,811,15,49],"class_list":{"0":"post-598505","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-eu","8":"tag-canada","9":"tag-cooperation","10":"tag-defense","11":"tag-eu","12":"tag-europe","13":"tag-european","14":"tag-european-defense","15":"tag-european-union","16":"tag-industry","17":"tag-multinational-defense-programs","18":"tag-negotiations","19":"tag-payments","20":"tag-procurement","21":"tag-security","22":"tag-united-kingdom","23":"tag-united-states"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115625413058778138","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/598505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=598505"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/598505\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/598506"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=598505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=598505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=598505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}