{"id":64069,"date":"2025-04-30T22:37:13","date_gmt":"2025-04-30T22:37:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/64069\/"},"modified":"2025-04-30T22:37:13","modified_gmt":"2025-04-30T22:37:13","slug":"an-asymmetric-fission-island-driven-by-shell-effects-in-light-fragments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/64069\/","title":{"rendered":"An asymmetric fission island driven by shell effects in light fragments"},"content":{"rendered":"
  • \n

    Meitner, L. & Frisch, O. R. Products of the fission of the uranium nucleus. Nature 143<\/b>, 239 (1939).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bohr, N. & Wheeler, J. A. The mechanism of nuclear fission. Phys. Rev. 56<\/b>, 426\u2013450 (1939).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Scamps, G. & Simenel, C. Impact of pear-shaped fission fragments on mass-asymmetric fission in actinides. Nature 564<\/b>, 382\u2013385 (2018).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bender, M. et al. Future of nuclear fission theory. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47<\/b>, 113002 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Eichler, M. et al. The role of fission in neutron star mergers and its impact on the r-process peaks. Astrophys. J. 808<\/b>, 30 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Yong, D. et al. r-process elements from magnetorotational hypernovae. Nature 595<\/b>, 223\u2013226 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Goriely, S. et al. New fission fragment distributions and r-process origin of the rare-earth elements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111<\/b>, 242502 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lemaire, M., Vaglio-Gaudard, C., Lyoussi, A. & Reynard-Carette, C. For a better estimation of gamma heating in nuclear material-testing reactors and associated devices: status and work plan from calculation methods to nuclear data. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 52<\/b>, 1093\u20131101 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nichols, A. L. et al. Improving fission-product decay data for reactor applications. I. Decay heat. Eur. Phys. J. A 59<\/b>, 78 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Strutinsky, V. Shell effects in nuclear masses and deformation energies. Nucl. Phys. A 95<\/b>, 420\u2013442 (1967).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andreyev, A. N. et al. New type of asymmetric fission in proton-rich nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105<\/b>, 252502 (2010).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Itkis, M., Vardaci, E., Itkis, I., Knyazheva, G. & Kozulin, E. Fusion and fission of heavy and superheavy nuclei (experiment). Nucl. Phys. A 944<\/b>, 204\u2013237 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    An, F. et al. Evolution of the reactor antineutrino flux and spectrum at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118<\/b>, 251801 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schmidt, K.-H., Steinhauser, S. & Bockstiegel, C. Relativistic radioactive beams: a new access to nuclear-fission studies. Nucl. Phys. A 665<\/b>, 221\u2013267 (2000).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chatillon, A. et al. Evidence for a new compact symmetric fission mode in light thorium isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124<\/b>, 202502 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Itkis, M. G., Okolovich, V. N. & Smirenkin, G. N. Symmetric and asymmetric fission of nuclei lighter than radium. Nucl. Phys. A 502<\/b>, 243\u2013260 (1989).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ghys, L. et al. Evolution of fission-fragment mass distributions in the neutron-deficient lead region. Phys. Rev. C 90<\/b>, 041301 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andel, B. et al. \u03b2-delayed fission of isomers in Bi 188. Phys. Rev. C 102<\/b>, 014319 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Nishio, K. et al. Excitation energy dependence of fragment-mass distributions from fission of 180,190Hg formed in fusion reactions of 36Ar\u2009+\u2009144,154Sm. Phys. Lett. B 748<\/b>, 89\u201394 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Prasad, E. et al. Observation of mass-asymmetric fission of mercury nuclei in heavy ion fusion. Phys. Rev. C 91<\/b>, 064605 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Tsekhanovich, I. et al. Observation of the competing fission modes in 178Pt. Phys. Lett. B 790<\/b>, 583\u2013588 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gupta, S. et al. Asymmetric fission around lead: the case of 198Po. Phys. Rev. C 100<\/b>, 064608 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Gupta, S. et al. Competing asymmetric fusion\u2013fission and quasifission in neutron-deficient sub-lead nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 803<\/b>, 135297 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Prasad, E. et al. Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb. Phys. Lett. B 811<\/b>, 135941 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bogachev, A. A. et al. Asymmetric and symmetric fission of excited nuclei of 180,190Hg and 184,192,202Pb formed in the reactions with 36Ar and 40,48Ca ions. Phys. Rev. C 104<\/b>, 024623 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Swinton-Bland, B. et al. Multi-modal mass-asymmetric fission of 178Pt from simultaneous mass-kinetic energy fitting. Phys. Lett. B 837<\/b>, 137655 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schmitt, C. et al. Experimental evidence for common driving effects in low-energy fission from sublead to actinides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126<\/b>, 132502 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Mahata, K. et al. Evidence for the general dominance of proton shells in low-energy fission. Phys. Lett. B 825<\/b>, 136859 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ichikawa, T., Iwamoto, A., M\u00f6ller, P. & Sierk, A. J. Contrasting fission potential-energy structure of actinides and mercury isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 86<\/b>, 024610 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Ichikawa, T. & M\u00f6ller, P. The microscopic mechanism behind the fission-barrier asymmetry (II): The rare-earth region 50\u2009Z\u2009N\u2009Phys. Lett. B 789<\/b>, 679\u2013684 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    M\u00f6ller, P. & Randrup, J. Calculated fission-fragment yield systematics in the region 74\u2009Z\u2009N\u2009Phys. Rev. C 91<\/b>, 044316 (2015).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andreev, A. V., Adamian, G. G. & Antonenko, N. V. Mass distributions for induced fission of different Hg isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 86<\/b>, 044315 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Andreev, A. V., Adamian, G. G., Antonenko, N. V. & Andreyev, A. N. Isospin dependence of mass-distribution shape of fission fragments of Hg isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 88<\/b>, 047604 (2013).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Panebianco, S. et al. Role of deformed shell effects on the mass asymmetry in nuclear fission of mercury isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 86<\/b>, 064601 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Warda, M., Staszczak, A. & Nazarewicz, W. Fission modes of mercury isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 86<\/b>, 024601 (2012).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    McDonnell, J. D., Nazarewicz, W., Sheikh, J. A., Staszczak, A. & Warda, M. Excitation-energy dependence of fission in the mercury region. Phys. Rev. C 90<\/b>, 021302 (2014).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Scamps, G. & Simenel, C. Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub-lead nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 100<\/b>, 041602 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Geissel, H. et al. The GSI projectile fragment separator (FRS): a versatile magnetic system for relativistic heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 70<\/b>, 286\u2013297 (1992).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Chatillon, A. et al. Experimental study of nuclear fission along the thorium isotopic chain: from asymmetric to symmetric fission. Phys. Rev. C 99<\/b>, 054628 (2019).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Martin, J.-F. et al. Fission-fragment yields and prompt-neutron multiplicity for Coulomb-induced fission of 234,235U and 237,238Np. Phys. Rev. C 104<\/b>, 044602 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Pellereau, E. et al. Accurate isotopic fission yields of electromagnetically induced fission of 238U measured in inverse kinematics at relativistic energies. Phys. Rev. C 95<\/b>, 054603 (2017).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Schmidt, K.-H., Jurado, B., Amouroux, C. & Schmitt, C. General description of fission observables: GEF model code. Nucl. Data Sheets 131<\/b>, 107\u2013221 (2016).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Hilaire, S. & Girod, M. Large-scale mean-field calculations from proton to neutron drip lines using the D1S Gogny force. Eur. Phys. J. A 33<\/b>, 237\u2013241 (2007).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Berger, J., Girod, M. & Gogny, D. Constrained Hartree-Fock and beyond. Nucl. Phys. A 502<\/b>, 85\u2013104 (1989).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Berger, J., Girod, M. & Gogny, D. Time-dependent quantum collective dynamics applied to nuclear fission. Comput. Phys. Commun. 63<\/b>, 365\u2013374 (1991).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bernard, R., Simenel, C. & Blanchon, G. Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov study of quantum shell effects on the path to fission in 180Hg, 236U and 256Fm. Eur. Phys. J. A 59<\/b>, 51 (2023).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Bernard, R. N., Simenel, C., Blanchon, G., Lau, N. T. & McGlynn, P. Fission of 180Hg and 264Fm: a comparative study. Eur. Phys. J. A 60<\/b>, 192 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Verriere, M. & Regnier, D. The time-dependent generator coordinate method in nuclear physics. Front. Phys. 8<\/b>, 233 (2020).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Verriere, M., Schunck, N. & Regnier, D. Microscopic calculation of fission product yields with particle-number projection. Phys. Rev. C 103<\/b>, 054602 (2021).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lau, N.-W. T., Bernard, R. N. & Simenel, C. Smoothing of one- and two-dimensional discontinuities in potential energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. C 105<\/b>, 034617 (2022).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Lasseri, R.-D., Regnier, D., Frosini, M., Verriere, M. & Schunck, N. Generative deep-learning reveals collective variables of fermionic systems. Phys. Rev. C 109<\/b>, 064612 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Carpentier, P., Pillet, N., Lacroix, D., Dubray, N. & Regnier, D. Construction of continuous collective energy landscapes for large amplitude nuclear many-body problems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133<\/b>, 152501 (2024).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     CAS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  • \n

    Christie, W. et al. A multiple sampling ionization chamber (MUSIC) for measuring the charge of relativistic heavy ions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 255<\/b>, 466\u2013476 (1987).<\/p>\n

    Article<\/a>\u00a0
    \n     ADS<\/a>\u00a0
    \n
    \n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n<\/li>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Meitner, L. & Frisch, O. R. Products of the fission of the uranium nucleus. Nature 143, 239 (1939).…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":64070,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3845],"tags":[30931,3965,3966,32979,32980,74,70,16,15],"class_list":{"0":"post-64069","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-experimental-nuclear-physics","9":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","10":"tag-multidisciplinary","11":"tag-nuclear-astrophysics","12":"tag-nuclear-fusion-and-fission","13":"tag-physics","14":"tag-science","15":"tag-uk","16":"tag-united-kingdom"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/114429312630533755","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64069"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64069\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/64070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}