{"id":677814,"date":"2026-01-06T14:06:15","date_gmt":"2026-01-06T14:06:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/677814\/"},"modified":"2026-01-06T14:06:15","modified_gmt":"2026-01-06T14:06:15","slug":"eu-distilleries-push-for-rye-whisky-resolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/677814\/","title":{"rendered":"EU distilleries push for rye whisky resolution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"standfirst u-standfirst\">Europe\u2019s rye whisky makers have lobbied for renegotiation over the use of the term \u2018rye whisky\u2019, which they were prohibited from using last year.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"rye EU Kyro\" width=\"650\" height=\"410\"  src=\"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/Kyro-Malt.jpg\" data- class=\"wp-image-779677 size-full lazyload\"\/>Kyr\u00f6 is one producer demanding \u2018swift and urgent\u2019 action<\/p>\n<p>Currently, only Canadian producers are permitted to use \u2018rye whisky\u2019 labelling after a 20-year-old EU agreement with Canada was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2025\/04\/eu-can-no-longer-label-rye-whisky-rye-whisky\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">enforced from 1 April 2025<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The trade agreement, signed in 2003 and ratified in 2024 to \u2018protect\u2019 Canadian producers, excludes Europe\u2019s distilleries from labelling their rye whiskies as such, even though they have been making whisky from rye for years.<\/p>\n<p>The regulation has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2025\/05\/rye-rejection-eu-whisky-meets-labelling-roadblock\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">created a roadblock for Europe\u2019s rye whisky producers<\/a>, who have had to relabel bottles to meet the rules.<\/p>\n<p>A host of producers has now signed a joint letter urging their nations\u2019 ministries to make changes to the agreement this year: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2023\/09\/kyro-distillery-creates-core-whisky-range\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kyr\u00f6 Distillery Company<\/a> and The Helsinki Distilling Company in Finland; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2024\/11\/stauning-bottles-single-cask-rye\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Stauning Whisky<\/a> and Thy Whisky in Denmark; Stork Club Rye Whiskey and Slyrs Bavarian Whisky Distillery in Germany; Agitator Whisky, Spirit of Hven, Tevsj\u00f6 distillery and Vattudalen in Sweden; Whiskydestillerie Haider and G\u00f6lles Brennerei in Austria; Agardi Distillery in Hungary; Maison Ferroni in France; Moe Distillery in Estonia; Zuidam Distillers in the Netherlands; and Sempione Distillery in Switzerland.<\/p>\n<p>The letter reads: \u201cWe, the European rye whisky producers, approach you related to the EU-Canada trade agreement (Agreement between the European community and Canada on trade in wines and spirit drinks \u2013 22004A0206(02)) and especially regarding the term \u2018rye whisky\u2019 being reserved only to Canadian products and excluding European products.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe agreement is up for renegotiation in 2026 and we demand swift and firm action as this is not only relevant to European producers but sets a dangerous precedent on how terms and treaties are protected.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the letter, the producers state that the initial deal was agreed at a time when Canadian rye whisky was not protected under a geographical indication (GI) and there was just one rye whisky producer in Europe.<\/p>\n<p>They say there are now at least 18 rye whisky producers in Europe, with combined whisky stock exceeding millions of litres and investment at more than \u20ac100 million (US$117m). According to the producers, this investment was made in \u201cgood faith that building business in the EU is safe and predictable\u201d.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Solution proposed for \u2018harmful situation\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The distilleries have called for three changes, beginning with \u201cimmediate preparations for a renegotiation of the agreement, with the goal of removing \u2018rye whisky\u2019 in the treaty annex\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>This should be followed by a \u201cjoint publicity plan to leverage the public interest in favour of the EU and Canadian producers of rye\u201d, and a \u201cbilateral agreement with Canada on cooperation and knowledge share to grow industries on both sides of the treaty.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It added: \u2018The current situation is harmful for industry on both sides, as Canadian rye whisky is not benefiting [from] marketing investments that EU distilleries are making to grow the category within the EU and abroad and vice versa. With smart policy and an accompanied publicity plan, we can \u2018grow the cake\u2019 instead of arguing on how it should be shared.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCanadian rye whisky is a specific style of rye whisky and not representative of the whole category. Unlike in the place of origin of rye whisky \u2013 Pennsylvania, US \u2013 where rye whisky has to be at least 51% rye, Canadian rye whisky uses rye as a flavour component and the regulation is very flax: it does not require any use of rye cereal when making the spirit.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCanadian rye whisky is already protected under GI in the EU. There is no need for additional protection by reserving the \u2018rye whisky\u2019 term, especially as Canada is not the country of origin of the category.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cCanadian rye whisky is the only category of whisky where the name-giving cereal is not the main ingredient. This is misleading to EU consumers and against EU values.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mikko Koskinen, founder and marketing director of Kyr\u00f6 Distillery, read out parts of the letter <a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/posts\/kyr%C3%B6-distillery-company_ryewhiskygate-activity-7412432426666491905-ppst\/?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=member_desktop&amp;rcm=ACoAAA0l38UBJ1tkgQcDd0ZJSnfVav3Yv6pWspo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">in a New Year\u2019s speech on LinkedIn<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Related news<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n                                <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2025\/11\/bruichladdich-creates-us-exclusive-rye-whisky\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n                                    Bruichladdich creates US-exclusive rye whisky<br \/>\n                                <\/a>\n                            <\/p>\n<p>\n                                <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2025\/05\/rye-rejection-eu-whisky-meets-labelling-roadblock\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n                                    Rye rejection: EU whisky meets labelling roadblock<br \/>\n                                <\/a>\n                            <\/p>\n<p>\n                                <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespiritsbusiness.com\/2025\/04\/eu-can-no-longer-label-rye-whisky-rye-whisky\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><br \/>\n                                    EU can no longer label rye whisky &#8216;rye whisky&#8217;<br \/>\n                                <\/a>\n                            <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Europe\u2019s rye whisky makers have lobbied for renegotiation over the use of the term \u2018rye whisky\u2019, which they&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":677815,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5174],"tags":[943,2000,299,5187,36,1824,205889,205890,205891,205892,205893,15469],"class_list":{"0":"post-677814","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-eu","8":"tag-canada","9":"tag-eu","10":"tag-europe","11":"tag-european","12":"tag-france","13":"tag-germany","14":"tag-kyro","15":"tag-nordics","16":"tag-rye-whisky","17":"tag-stauning","18":"tag-stork-club","19":"tag-whisky"},"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/pubeurope.com\/@uk\/115848543282079386","error":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=677814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/677814\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/677815"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=677814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=677814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.europesays.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=677814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}